A London zebra crossing has reignited the age-old drivers vs cyclists debate.
Drivers face licences, insurance, MOTs and rising costs, while anyone can unlock an e-bike and be on the road in seconds.
But with pedestrians being forced to dodge riders at crossings, has the balance gone too far?
What do you think?
#drivers #pedestrians #roadsafety #uknews #onthefencetv
3 Comments
If cyclists ignore the rules of the road that the rest of us have to adhere to we should have no repurcussions to pushing them off as they go past, especially at pedestrian crossings, watching one get shoved over would be perfect
Playing the fool on the road, but the pavement should be taboo. Third party insurance would be just. To be fair cyclists are so vulnerability, a separate lane, not a painted line, would be best.
I ask Google why cyclists can look at mobile phones while riding
It came back they are not as dangerous as cars and don't hurt or kill people.
When ask why the don't need insurance or a driving licence
Same answer.
As someone who been hit by a cyclists coming down a one way road the wrong way
And had cuts and mark and brusis on all over me where the bike hit me plus knocking me to the ground.
He just said it was my fault a d rode off
People who where next to me also crossing where also nearly knock over when I went down where shouting at him to stop but he did not.
It took nearly 3 weeks for me to heal
1 week less than a car took that hit me at 40 mph who was recklessly driving.
So tell me how are bike less dangerous
Especially the bike now that have a electric motor
Really motorbikes.