Ok, so the new Endurace CFR came out. Apparently it tests only 1W slower in wind tunnel vs Aeroad CFR (not sure at which speed but the differences in aerodynamics don't matter apparently), has a stiffer bottom bracket / back as per van der Poel request – I assume that's vs the earlier Endurace version, not sure how it stacks up against Aeroad CFR, anyone knows?
Endurace has a bigger fork clearance so turning it occasionally into a gravel bike becomes an option and then there is a new integrated aero handlebar that apparently tests significantly faster in wind tunnel than the standard one (not sure how it tests against the optional aero drops though).
So… doesn't it kind of cannibalize the Aeroad? Not sure what's the benefit of getting it, when you can get a bike just as fast but more versatile. Am I missing any benefits of Aeorad CFR over Endurance CFR?
by Perforu
4 Comments
I am of the exact same opinion and you summarized it perfectly.
This is the reason why I got the new endurace CFR. For mortals it cannibalizes the aeroad completely imo. Also there is the UDH benefit as well, definitely a factor to consider for future upgrades.
There’s basically no difference between the two that would lead to someone buying the Aeroad instead of the Endurace for a normal customer. Bigger tyre clearance on the Endurace is the biggest benefit for most people.
Honestly, Canyon should have called the Endurace the Aeroad Max or Aeroad Plus.
Canyon will probably keep some colours Aeroad exclusive and some Endurace exclusive as not to cannibalize Aeroad sales if I had to guess.
If i was rich i would get the aeroad cfr
But aeroad looks slightly more sexy and you can fit up to 35mm tires which is already plenty on road