

My options are a Trek 520 (3×9 Shimano and Shimano V brakes so probably from 2007-2014) or a 2015 Norco Search S3. I am using it to do 2-3 day camping trips in Quebec. I like the looks of the green trek more but it seems like the Norco is a faster bike (smaller tires). Any advice would be great! (both are around 650$ CAD)
by Jackfaller
6 Comments
The one that fits you the best/is most comfortable and enjoyable for long rides. Smaller tires is a disadvantage. If both fit equally, I would personally choose the trek 520.
Either should to be in good condition or serviced to be in good condition before you make any trip.
As long as the fit is good, I’d go with the Trek. The ability for larger tires far outweighs any speed advantage – you’ll be far more comfortable. The gearing is already set for loaded rides. And that bike will last forever.
The Trek was a higher end bike in its day, but it’s way older and I really like disc brakes. If it fits you I would get the Norco and put the biggest tires that will fit on it.
Either bike will hold up fine for what you’re doing.
Just wanted to post that a quick search says the max tire width for 700c on the Norco is 45mm. Not huge but reasonable for any paved trip and decent for smooth gravel or shorter trips likeOP’s 2-3 day trip.
Probably leaning towards the Norco, especially if it’s 9 speed and cassette.
Can’t see any top rear eyelets on the trek either. Probably there?
Whichever you get, if one has a freewheel and one a cassette, pick the cassette one.
Upright handlebars FOR SURE
So there is no wrong way to tour
But sacrificing efficiency for comfort… you’re already tugging 30lbs of gear… be comfortable and get there a little later
Over 50+ days your body will still be thanking you instead of having thrown in the towel a thousand miles back