Hey Jason, I know you cover a lot of Northwest London, Ontario… but could you cover more of the downtown and east end? People live all around the city and the Wavell Street protection is great… as much as drivers REALLY, really don’t seem to like it.

And it’s not perfect but it’s definitely going in the right direction compared to what it was before.

But because there are so many vocal drivers complaining about “how narrow the roadway is now” and “I can’t even turn because I don’t know the dimensions of the deadly vehicle that I’m driving”… I think it’s important for you to cover why more streets in London need to resemble Wavell in the future.

#ldnont #londonontario #wavellbikelane #notjustbikes #bikecommuting #errandsonabike #errandsviabike #biking #bikelanes #bikelane #protectedbikelanes #pedestriandignity #bendurham

31 Comments

  1. that looks bad tho. it‘s better than paint but it‘s not fully protected and the seperation that is in place is little more than paperthin, plus it‘s ugly. an example of genuienly good car and cycling infrastructure would be raising the cycling path with a curb and seperating it from the car lanes with a row of small shrubs. i don‘t understand why they draw a line with paint on the street and put up some poles and call it amazing, it‘s not and it takes one guy with a car and ego big enough to smash through that. things getting better doesn‘t equal things being good.

  2. You sir are reaping tax payer rewards. These lanes are a stupid misuse of taxpayer money. Ever heard of sidewalks? Despite that; you should be paying a fee to a.) BE LICENSED. b.) Use these lanes that impinge upon motorways. Also? You suck. None of you cyclists obey road rules. I am from London. Call us fake? F-YOU. Here's a thought. Use the 30+ kms of trails that are paved that go across all of London. DICK.

  3. The recent videos about Japan illustrate that this type of infrastructure is really just for cars. Segregation is necessary on higher speed roads but this is kind of a backwards fix for not having streets inside of mixed use neighborhoods. It's safer to integrate cars, cyclists, and pedestrians; people coexisting and moving at nearly the same speed.

  4. Protected bike lanes as cheap as possible, but it’s not fully protected. That’s North America for ya. On the bright side, there’s always room for improvement.

  5. Watching US videos about infrastructure that isn't specifically and exclusively for cars feels like getting a picture that is just crayon scribbles from a 3-year-old. Like: Good job, buddy, I'm really glad you got there – but it won't be hanging in the Louvre, just the fridge…

Leave A Reply