Hi everyone,
I'm looking for a new gravel bike and I've narrowed it down to two carbon models. I am 190 cm tall with a 92 cm inseam
Both bikes use the same drivetrain: a full Shimano GRX 1×12 setup (RX822 rear derailleur, RX610 shifters/crank, and 10-51T Deore cassette). Since the performance of the gears and brakes is identical, I am focusing on the frame, weight, and price differences
Comparison of Key Differences
| Feature | Cube Nuroad C:62 ONE | Kross Esker ADV 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €2,000 | €2,300 |
| Weight | 9.4 kg | 10.1 kg |
| Frame Storage | None | Internal storage compartment |
| Bottom Bracket | Pressfit (Shimano BB71) | T47 Threaded (Acros) |
| Wheels | Newmen Performance X.R. 25 | Shimano RX180 |
| Tyres | Schwalbe G-One R Pro | Schwalbe G-One R Allround |
| Cockpit (Handlebar/Seatpost) | Carbon | Aluminum |
| Stack/Reach | 624/402 mm | 623/402 mm |
| Link | Cube NUROAD C:62 ONE | Kross ESKER ADV 1.0 |
The Cube seems to offer better hardware for a lower price. It is 0.7 kg lighter, uses higher-end Pro tyres, and comes with a carbon handlebar and seatpost
However, I really like the integrated frame storage in Kross, and I like the painting more
I’ve also heard that both brands can sometimes have issues with frame warranty claims. However, since Kross is a domestic brand for me, I assume that local servicing and handling any potential claims would be much easier than with a foreign brand
Which one would you go for? Is the convenience of the frame storage, painting, and potentially better warranty service worth the €300 premium and the extra weight?
by Fabi118
1 Comment
my Partner has the Cube, its a good bike but nothing really special.
dont focus too much on those 0.7kg weight difference, thats a solid poop in the morning.
Go with the one you like more, which is the Kross.
additionaly the threaded bb will make diy services so much easier.