Share.

16 Comments

  1. RespectTheCruller on

    I’d pay that much for an OG one that’s lugged, but there is a pretty square trade-off with this already having modern components on it. this would save you on virtually every upgrade an xbike dork like me would do and it’s got a cool badge saying you’re super special, so this price seems fair.

  2. Tight_Explanation707 on

    you’ll spend way more tryna do this yourself.

    i like the sugino cranks and the wide cliffhanger wheels.

  3. OpenWorldMaps on

    Would rather have an old beat up one that is original vs one that has a bunch of modern upgrades.

  4. $3-400 max. Stumpys are desireable, no doubt. The days of $150 vintage Stumpjumbers are behind us. $750 is smoking crack tho.

    edit: 3-400 in mint condition, this one is not.

  5. Choice_Student4910 on

    It’s a built up museum quality bike. I wouldn’t mind owning it but I’d feel really bad about damaging the paint if it ever fell down.

  6. theatrenearyou on

    I bought a mint 1991 Stumpjumper for 190. and I thought that was over-paying but I liked the grey color with the red lettering. You bike there is pretty but you can buy a lot of old minty stump jumpers for less than 750. Offer $500. That’s high and not an insulting lowball offer (And I think you’ll get it b/c I doubt he’s getting 750)

  7. Nostalgia is a powerful drug sold at a premium. Old school graphics aside, it’s a clunky old frame with a tank of a seatpost and a whole slew of mediocre components being sold for way more than it’s worth because it’s a “limited edition.” I get it, and people will pay for it, but for me, this is a $300 bike all day. At most. If someone wants to pay $1000+ for it (or $750), I won’t judge, but for me, hard nope.

Leave A Reply