I am getting back into cycling after 10 years looking for my first road bike. I found good deals on Merida scultura endurance 6000 or scultura 6000.

Beacuse of the relaxed geometry I was almost set on the endurance, But I found a used non endurance scultra cheaper enough that I am considering it. But I cannot really read geometry specs to understand the level of difference.

using this guide https://www.sierra.com/lp2/bike-fit-guide/, I measured 6'1" height, 35" inseam, 24.4" arm length

both bikes are in L size

Endurance geometry:

https://preview.redd.it/2zdm70qf2tqe1.png?width=1768&format=png&auto=webp&s=768bec89cbb7f1c9d08d530ed2a96c418341f20b

Regular geometry:

https://preview.redd.it/ryj3qpwi2tqe1.png?width=1748&format=png&auto=webp&s=d03df8897d58ee44fce27dd399878a22fd5e1aae

by HiIamTom

Share.

1 Comment

  1. apeincalifornia on

    Ive been doing bike fittings since 2004. The huge difference is the headtube length, the regular geometry is almost 4.5cm shorter. Im not sure how accurate your 34” inseam measurement is but if you are with long legs, you need more headtube height. The top tube length is not significantly different, a stem change can solve that. Knowing if you have long arms would help. So many other measurements to consider. Overall the endurance fit seems like a much better fit based on the info I’ve got.

Leave A Reply