Had to make a new post. Stated folded isn’t all that different but I’ve seen images of the Tern with the tape measure out that suggest it runs a little big.
Tern Vektron is 20% bigger in volume (0.20m3 for Brompton vs 0.24m3 for Vektron).
LingonberryOk6338 on
I hear get things about the tern vektron. One pro from the g-line is you can fold the back wheel in kickstand mode and it has a 2nd smaller form
chimera691 on
Are both as able on gravel and dirt?
chimera691 on
And what about repairability or availability of components?
usr000nm on
I wanted to put a baby seat on a small folding bike once, but the LBS convinced me it’s not safe and not a good idea. Brompton’s site also says 22lbs max for the rear rack. My 2.5 y.o. is already heavier than that without the seat.
So I’d go for the Tern. It actually looks built up enough to handle the weight safely, their site has a picture of a child seat, etc..
I do all sorts of weird custom hacks on my own bikes and ebike. I have folders, non-folders, rear racks, front racks, dual motors, multiple batteries – but for my wife’s bike and my own bike that accept our Topeak child seat on the rear racks, I’m much more conservative and stay closer to OEM specified parts and limits.
calvinistgrindcore on
Test rode both, bought the Vektron. The Vektron’s motor is WAY better, but yes it’s chunky and in real life it’s a lot more awkward when folded than the Brompton. If the fold is the most important factor, go Brompton. If motor, ride quality, or “full size handling” is the priority, the Vektron is the clear winner.
As far as gravel handling, you don’t give anything up at all with the Vektron. It does great on gravel.
Willing_Stomach_8121 on
If your main riding is going to be with a child seat I would recommend the Tern over the Brompton. Yes larger form factor but for reasons others have stated I would go for that.
7 Comments
Had to make a new post. Stated folded isn’t all that different but I’ve seen images of the Tern with the tape measure out that suggest it runs a little big.
Tern Vektron is 20% bigger in volume (0.20m3 for Brompton vs 0.24m3 for Vektron).
I hear get things about the tern vektron. One pro from the g-line is you can fold the back wheel in kickstand mode and it has a 2nd smaller form
Are both as able on gravel and dirt?
And what about repairability or availability of components?
I wanted to put a baby seat on a small folding bike once, but the LBS convinced me it’s not safe and not a good idea. Brompton’s site also says 22lbs max for the rear rack. My 2.5 y.o. is already heavier than that without the seat.
So I’d go for the Tern. It actually looks built up enough to handle the weight safely, their site has a picture of a child seat, etc..
I do all sorts of weird custom hacks on my own bikes and ebike. I have folders, non-folders, rear racks, front racks, dual motors, multiple batteries – but for my wife’s bike and my own bike that accept our Topeak child seat on the rear racks, I’m much more conservative and stay closer to OEM specified parts and limits.
Test rode both, bought the Vektron. The Vektron’s motor is WAY better, but yes it’s chunky and in real life it’s a lot more awkward when folded than the Brompton. If the fold is the most important factor, go Brompton. If motor, ride quality, or “full size handling” is the priority, the Vektron is the clear winner.
As far as gravel handling, you don’t give anything up at all with the Vektron. It does great on gravel.
If your main riding is going to be with a child seat I would recommend the Tern over the Brompton. Yes larger form factor but for reasons others have stated I would go for that.