Are there any frame geometry differences between size s and m on the grizl al?
Last year I went to the Koblenz factory where i tried the Grizl and Endurace in sizes S and M as i fall like many others right in the middle with an 86cm inseam and 178cm height as measured by Canyon.
I preferred the feeling and nimbleness of S but canyon recommended i buy M due to how it looked and based on low speed stability.
I now have both bikes in size M, and i cant get over that i should’ve bought S. The Endurace has a one piece cockpit so not much i can do, the Grizl i swapped to a 60mm stem as i put the bike together.
Would a size S have shorter reach than my M with 60mm stem?
Thanks
by Character_Maize7756
2 Comments
It appears you are looking for bike fitting help. Please make sure you post as screenshot of the Canyon size chart for your bike, with your point in it. See [this example](https://imgur.com/a/ALUfXyy)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CanyonBikes) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Yes they are different but stack height is the most notable. I’ve have both sizes of the grizl. Both worked fine. Small has the lower stack height, maybe a little more agile. Medium felt a little more stable when bombing descents. Neither changed the way I ride significantly. Same height as you with slightly shorter inseam. I think with your inseam a medium is fine.