Share.

13 Comments

  1. Beyond_0451 on

    I would choose the Troll simply because the blades are straight. All the other tubes are straight, so why not the fork?

  2. Yep, you’ve got a winner on your hands. Might be able to get that cruddy chainstay protector off with a heat gun or hair dryer. Warm it up and peel. Then use some goo-gone to get the residue off.

  3. Any_Painting584 on

    970 is my favorite bike of all time. Looking for another one. I sold mine a decade ago. You can’t got wrong with either fork. Maybe find the fork that gives you max wheelbase to increase stability. From what I remember the 970 is a bit twitchy and would turn in a dime (I did have a 1998 Judy SL on it).

  4. GenericName187 on

    LHT fork axle to crown (~375 mm) will be shorter than the stock fork (maybe ~395 mm) and Troll will be longer. The shorter fork may feel twitchier.

  5. The Troll has a longer axle to crown. Slacker, taller front end gets my vote. You aren’t racing. And the Troll has all the mount points.

  6. idliketogobut on

    Nice dude! Nothing to add re: the fork but I scooped a ‘94 970 about a month ago for bike packing in the same color scheme. It’s a great ride and looks sick with purple anodized bits

  7. Slight-Estate-5847 on

    That’s bad to the bone!

    My vote is for the Troll fork… especially since you’re already rockin’ the Moloko bar!

    That’d be a bitchin combo.

    Gotta admit I’m kind of jealous… I’ve been looking for one of those for a while. It’s even my size.

    Lmk if you want to sell it..

  8. That’s a hell of a frame. lightweight 90’s frames with threadless 1 1/8 steerers are just *chef’s kiss*.

Leave A Reply