Brahms: Piano Concertos Nos. 1 and 2. Emil Gilels (piano), Berlin Philharmonic, Eugen Jochum (cond.) DG
Hello friends this is Dave herwitz executive editor at classicstoday.com here with reference recordings and today we’re talking about the brahs piano caneros sets both of them as Cycles this is really a little tricky and again like all of these these these talks and I keep repeating this over and over again
So much of the interest is getting to probe the discographic history of these pieces and see why the reference became the reference and this is really a very interesting interesting story because there were lots of opportunities for reference recordings but somehow um we never really coalesced the consensus never quite coales until we
Got to yoham and Gil’s on Deutsche gramophone now these were recorded 1972 um and yeah 1972 and you know I that’s it’s a long time to wait you think for Major Works of Brahms but not when you understand where we were with them and what the history was because in addition to
Having a reference recording for the pair there are also reference recordings for each conero individually and therein lies a tale so let’s let’s go through it just a little bit let’s start first of all the two ceros were never equally popular number two was always more popular than number
Number one um and as a result of that there were usually more recordings of number two out there whereas number one was considered something a little bit of a specialty piece now in the 1950s and early 60s the market for number one was dominated not by a
Pianist but by a conductor by George cell who recorded it with Clifford kerzon Ona Rudolph cirin and Leon fer all of them and he owned the accompaniment to brahs coner number one he really did I mean it was really extraordinary and so you had to get one of them with cell but the
Three pianists who were all excellent really First Rate musicians and they were competing with themselves in some respects because well feser only did it once of course but cirin did them twice he did them with cell and he did them with ormandy and ormandy was no slouch
Either even in the first he was a wonderful bronze conductor terribly underrated and of course one of the great accompanists that ever lived and so and so these performances which were very very highly regarded by everybody I mean even if people didn’t like fer because it was America they they could
Like cirin and certainly Clifford kerson and then other people did the second for example sfat salaf RoR I mean RoR did the second but not the first so it was very hard to come to a consensus on what the best brahs conero cycle was you you were there were many choices for
Individual performances and of course those will be the subject of future videos um believe you me they shall but really it was a complicated thing so so that’s what sort of dominated the universe in the 60s of course there were others too there was always Claud oral there were other great pianists
Recording these pieces but you know claudo oral one of your the commentators always said why haven’t you mentioned Cloud oral for these like solo works that we were talking about and I I I I was thinking about that because he’s like one of my favorite pianists ever
And I love like his entire Phillips Legacy I think it’s stunning and there are some amazing pieces which you know performances which could well serve as references but there was also a school that regarded him as excessively serious um somewhat for square and and for that
Reason reason I I he just never seemed to get the sort of universal Acclaim that he probably deserved first he wasn’t terribly four square but he was very serious and he was extremely concerned with beauty of tone he had a very special sound um it wasn’t to all tastes let’s just put it
That way um and that’s just the way it was there’s no arguing with it it’s a fact it’s what it was but he was amazing so he recorded these works lots of people were doing that but it wasn’t it was a shortage it’s just that it was
Hard to come to a consensus pick until these showed up and this really this was really a wonderful moment I think in discographic history because I had been reading reviews now when this these showed up in in what 72 I was only I was only 12 11 or 12 so I I didn’t
Know anything about these pieces I really didn’t um I only started paying attention several years obviously later when I was in my late teens but that wasn’t such a long time after these came out and I went back because I was always curious about things you know our
Library had all the old high fidelities and stereo reviews and gramophones and all that stuff and I went back I read reviews and you know when I started to learn French I started reading them in French and I tried to learn them when I learned German I read them in German you
Know I I went back and I wanted to see what people were saying and the fascinating thing about what I discovered you know sort of doing this as part of my work as an actual critic and having to you know pick reference recordings and come out with things like
This was that when these came out everything just coalesced around them you know all of the there were wonderful reviews of lots of other performances and people were recommending PR Cycles but this was the one that really solidified the the universe of classical music critics and I think listeners also
You know you yam was the most underrated brahs conductor who ever lived because his brahs is stunning it’s as great as anybody’s and he did two brah Cycles there’s the mono one with Berlin and then the the stereo one with what is it London Phil or the Phil it’s London Phil
I think um or London Symphony one of the other I I don’t remember but it doesn’t matter it was on Emi um now Warner and they’re they’re great they’re just incredibly he had you know fort flang fort wangler’s flexibility of pulse with none of his problems with orchestral
Discipline um and pulling an orchestra together and my God these things were great so when he did the accompaniments you knew that first of all you had a conductor Who was every bit as as as worthy of the music worthy as a partner in these incredibly symphonic and
Charity where the piano and the orchestra are on absolutely equal basis throughout um you had an ideal bronze conductor and gilels well gilels was a legend wasn’t RoR of course he was considered to be sort of more more sturdy and sober and kind of grumpy you know but his Beethoven was the German
Standards were his thing Beethoven and brahs so it was it was going to be exciting to hear him do the two brahm’s kerity and indeed it was and to do them with yoh you just finally had a pairing that was going to be able to deliver equally fabulous results in both
Keros you know I mean remember remember the controversy over pini’s first brah cycle the second Certo was with aato the first was with Carl burm and I remember everybody dumping all over Carl burm because they said he was just German Four Square stoty I actually liked bum
Because because the piece is a little German in four square and study and because and because bum did bring out that Grim dogged granitic is the word right element in the music that I thought was fine but for that reason because poenis had two separate conductors um you know there was a lot
Of of preference giving some people preferred the first most people preferred the second you know the two of them didn’t quite come together as a unified package I mean that’s kind of what happened with these pieces really kind of remarkable when you consider that there only two of them but they are
Such different works and and they require you know pianist of extraordinary depth of sensibility and a conductor who can be an absolute equal partner all the way through it was a tough job and um I just um it was a moment I just remember it like it was yesterday just reading all
These reviews all of a sudden everyone aha the reference recording y gal now since then there have been a bazillion brah cycles and some of them have just been excellent you know you had like who was Harden cour and po binder and you had Nelson frer and and and Shai and you
Had you know I mean some really really fine things popping around in addition to marvelous individual you know Singleton performances so it was very easy for this to get swallowed up in the ensuing flood because remember the 70s were the beginning of that insane period 20 30 years when the industry just went
Nuts and recorded everybody doing everything that they possibly could over and over and over and over and over and it was very hard to keep track of what the best versions were or what the reference recording was because the consensus that coalesced around these performances proceeded to fragment afterwards that’s what happens that’s
What happens with this stuff so if you didn’t catch this when it came out trust me this was a moment it was a historical moment in the discography of the brahs piano and and um if you listen to these you will very very readily understand why so
Keep on listening friends thanks so much for joining me take care
31 Comments
Nothing matches these. The slow movement of the 1sr is extraordinary. The only one I would miss on my desert island is the Anda 2nd with Karajan.
Magnificent performances! The atmosphere is so beautifully sustained in the 3rd movement of No.2 , it always takes my breath away.
What were some of the contenders for the reference recording of the concertos before Gilels?
And 50+ years later, despite numerous other excellent sets recorded, this set remains unsurpassed. Absolutely worthy of the status as Reference Recordings for these 2 masterpieces by Brahms.
Thanks for honouring my curiosity about Claudio Arrau, Dave! I always admire Claudio’s seriousness and his attention to the tone. I think it’s an utmost treasure to the musical world which deserves much more attention than it ever gets. On the side way, I think your seriousness to the musical critics, alone with your expertise is an utmost treasure, too. I honestly think you shouldn’t pay the level of attention as you did to those who have trashed your honesty and perspective and the spirit of free speech. To me, they deserve nothing more than two words: f**k off! Please keep going and concentrate with your wonderful work, Dave! Lots of love from Australia
Great choice! Still my preference, after half a century. Originally, though, I simply lucked into them–the LPs coming in a box of reviewer disks.
I got the original box set (2 LP) when it was released after hearing an excellent comment on Radio Canada FM at the time. It has always been my favorite version. The entrance of the piano at the beginning of the first movement of the first concerto is magnificent. In the original box set note we can read that this recording was made at the request of many music lovers who had loved Gilels in his recording of works by Brahms for solo piano on DG
Absolutely agree their reference status. Powerful, deeply felt performances in full Brahmsian idiom.
wow – coincidentally I own this set
Yes, absolutely and unquestionably yes… my beloved Emilio!!
I’ll have to check out this set. I only own individual recordings. I don’t dislike the first concerto, but the second…Oh my!! My two favorite recordings of it are by Cliburn and Watts.
I would be content if Jochum and Gilel’s Brahms 2nd piano concerto was the final piece I heard on this earth. What do you think of Zimerman and Bernstein’s Brahms 2nd?
Dear Mr Hurwitz, with Pollini's passing, maybe you should mention the "standard" he established in late Beethoven or some Chopin cycles. I love Gilels choice. Sometimes, I wonder what his reputation (and contracts) would be if he weren't overshadowed by Richter as "second" Russian pianist.
Yet another one that I have!
I remember reading all those positive reviews when these recordings came out. But it took me a long time to warm up to them. I found them deficient in strength, sinew, dramatic tension and sheer pianistic brilliance, at least when compared to Gilels's earlier effort with Reiner in No. 2, and Fleisher/Szell in No. 1. Eventually I came round to appreciating them for their warmth and subtlety, but I still find the Brahmsian passions muted. Among many other versions of hallowed memory we should not forget Rubinstein, first with Krips then with Leinsdorf and the BSO. Rubinstein was a formidable Brahmsian, and it shows in all his recordings of that composer.
Hello dave, any plans to do Pollini's complete dg box? Fair to say he is a bit divisive so it'll be interesting to see your take on his work disc by disc.
I'd also be interested in a video on Serkin's sony box or maybe Arrau's big decca/philips box, two really wonderful pianists who did lots of great stuff.
Big fan of your work, keep up!
Actually my favorite recording of the Brahms Piano Concerto No. 1 is the 1954 one by Artur Rubinstein and the Chicago Symphony under Fritz Reiner. It's the all-time greatest (in my humble opinion) and the one I'd play for anyone who dismisses Brahms as a neo-classical bore. Unfortunately, Rubinstein couldn't stand Reiner and he made his later concerto recordings with a more complaisant conductor, Josef Krips.
This is an easy choice. Indeed they are the reference recordings.
I love both l and ll with Nelson Freire/Chailly/Gewandhause 👏👏🔥
I imprinted on the Pollini recordings, and I still go back to his performances. RIP, Maestro. (I agree with your statement that having two different conductors somehow diminishes the Pollini set. Nonsense.)
Gilels is a fine choice and the historical circumstances were just right for this. The other interesting case is that of Fleisher/Szell, not only because it was highly revered at the time, but Fleisher's subsequent injury led to so many students and fans revisiting all of his earlier stuff creating a new resurgence in interest in his playing. Both great sets!
Please, a "Der Rosenkavalier" reference recording video!
I agree. I'm 70 and remember when Gilels/Jochum appeared. In UK (meaning Gramophone, I fear), up to that point the references were Curzon/Szell for 1 and Backhaus/Boehm for 2. The latter baffled me, I must say. The orchestral playing and sound quality were superb, but old Backhaus (who was fine when at his best in his 30s and 50s recordings) rambles vaguely through, with the odd grand moment. Thanks also for comments on Arrau. I 'learnt' these pieces from his records with Giulini (EMI), so different from the Gilels, and was one of the people who could never make out why they were ignored. (I prefer them to his Haitink ones.)
Thank you very much for your insightful and erudite commentary. I’m so very glad to have discovered your channel. Maurizio Pollini’s passing put me in the mind to ask whether you might consider a series of talks on pianists, especially living ones. I’ve often wondered, for instance, what you think of artists like Evgeny Kissin and Daniel Trifonov. Thanks again.
Being European, the Gilels/Jochum set was indeed the reference and hence the first I knew, and it was depressing insofar as I couldn't seem to "get" the 1st, to the extent where I kept wondering if something was wrong with me. Then I heard Fleisher with Szell, and after all those years, the penny dropped instantly, in fact, that first movement in particular may have become my favorite piano concerto recording of anything whatsoever, setting me on a journey of collecting recordings of the 1st, love it to bits, along with, of course, the 2nd. Anyway, the process of getting to know the Brahms Piano Concerti in this manner was a weird experience. What I'm trying to say is there's an intimidation factor to "reference recordings" that can make one second-guess one's tastes in interpretation and performance, and this to me was the recording that made me overcome this sense of trepidation. As you've mentioned in several other videos of this "reference recordings" series, there are ones you don't much like either, and they are what they are so we have something to refer to talking about our favorites.
Gilles/Jochum is a great choice for a reference! (I am a big fan of Arrau/Guilini, but less of a fan of Arrau/Davis.)
Just discovered your channel, very interesting! I would suggest Michael Korstick's newly released Brahms Concerto CD (German Hänssler), you will not be disappointed!
Three things blow me away about these recordings. According to ROs account of the sessions in Records and Recording – Jochum said that there is more magic in the Brahms concerti than the symphonies – I think he’s right – that’s how he conducts them. Second – Gilels never played the first concerto in public – in fact these session were the only occasion he played it. The Berlin Phil and DG people were the only people who heard it. Finally Gilels delivers performance of the First concerto which seems to me to be a pinnacle recording of the Romantic period/movement/sensibility. I find it thrilling and terrifying.
Yes, this is exactly what I expected. I bought them in the 1980s on cassette because reviews suggested they were the best, and was not disappointed. Good to know the background. Incidentally, it seems we are the same age.
Hi Dave, I totally agree wiith your choice. It was like a lightening bolt when I lowered the stylus onto the record. I never listened to Curzon again.
I think I've listened to every recording of Piano Concerto No. 2 there is and none can touch Richter/Leinsdorf/CSO. I think Freire & Chially recent recording gives an idea of how even more extraordinary the Richter/Leinsdorf might have sounded like if it were recorded with today's studio technology. There's enough great recordings of Piano Concerto No. 2, it's hard to pick a favorite.