-17 will pretty much always look better, but 0 can look good too. Whatever you find more comfy.
Beluga-ga-ga-ga-ga on
As long as definitely comfortable for you, go with the -17⁰.
Deep_Blue96 on
Looks like you’ve already got -17 on there, no? Assuming this is comfortable for you, most people here will agree you should stick with it. -17 will be almost exactly parallel with the top tube on your frame, which looks nice aesthetically.
NJS_Stamp on
If you’re running that many spacers to run a -17, it deff looks form > function.
You could probably drop a big spacer and run a -6 and still have an aggressive bike fit.
5 Comments
I went with -17 mainly due to the aesthetics.
-17 will pretty much always look better, but 0 can look good too. Whatever you find more comfy.
As long as definitely comfortable for you, go with the -17⁰.
Looks like you’ve already got -17 on there, no? Assuming this is comfortable for you, most people here will agree you should stick with it. -17 will be almost exactly parallel with the top tube on your frame, which looks nice aesthetically.
If you’re running that many spacers to run a -17, it deff looks form > function.
You could probably drop a big spacer and run a -6 and still have an aggressive bike fit.