After many years of consistent, concrete measures to improve cycling—and discourage driving—cyclists now outnumber motorists on the streets of London.

Since 1999, cycling has spiked 386% and driving fallen 64%; with cyclists representing 40% of surface traffic—including pedestrians—during peak hours.

Share.

4 Comments

  1. What is it about London’s infrastructure that seems to bring out a higher percentage of Type 1 and 2 cyclists and doesn’t entice larger amounts of Type 3 or more vulnerable populations (families, etc.)? It does seem to be safer infrastructure: separated for a majority of the distance. But I’ve heard that the majority who use the networks go extremely fast and treat the lanes like they are a crit race. What inherently about the infrastructure lends itself to this instead of fostering an all ages and abilities culture?

  2. Those look like very narrow lanes for the volume of cyclists, which makes passing difficult. And given that London has a reputation for "hard-core" athletic, spandex-clad sport cyclists, this really puts off casual cyclists and people who are vulnerable. If another general traffic lane was converted to a cycling lane, you'd probably see a more diverse crowd of people using them, including children and the elderly.

Leave A Reply