Share.

27 Comments

  1. Let's all be honest and admit that, although doping has always been an irrefutable fact in cycling, it took the dimension of an avalanche when English speaking cycling showed up in higher number. It did cast a shadow of suspect and dishonesty over any single rider from all over the world. Armstrong was a curse, a disgrace for cycling.

  2. "some doped some clean"…..hahaha…get real. after 7 years of Armstrong comes Landis….no says France. were not having that….yet his comeback stage is one of most exciting ever.

  3. I watched Landis at US Nationals in Cincinnati, 1998, I think. Danny Pate and Mike Creed were there. Landis struggled to stay in main pack. So his improvements were highly suspicious. He was not a tour de france winner, for sure.

  4. Cycling is weird. Performance enhancers have always been intrinsically linked with the sport, the question has always been where do you draw the line? What makes one substance a legal performance enhancer and another illegal?

    How much should we care?

  5. lol they’re faster now than ever too… there might be more testing, but cyclists have just gotten even better with their doping methods. Armstrong and the whole peloton were juiced to the gills, and they’d get smoked today.

Leave A Reply