More than 4.3 million children in the UK currently live in poverty, which is a third of all children.

In the last five years, the number in food insecurity has doubled and those living in households unable to put the heating on has quadrupled.

The Labour government says tackling this is high on its agenda and has enlisted a taskforce to come up with an ambitious child poverty strategy before the end of the year.

But many are calling for immediate action now and are putting pressure on the government to reverse the two-child benefit cap, which restricts means-tested benefits to the first two children in most households.

Last week, more than 100 Labour MPs urged the Chancellor Rachel Reeves to hike gambling taxes in order to scrap the cap.

Tasha Williams is a mum from Swindon. She lives with her husband and four children. Both parents work but are unable to afford the rising prices and mounting household bills.

Statistics show that families with three or more children are much more likely to be living in poverty and that child poverty in working families is on the rise due to low growth in earnings and rising living costs.

Tasha’s youngest daughter does not qualify for universal credit because of the two-child benefit cap. She says this adds to her family being trapped in a cycle of poverty.

“It’s just not fair, especially when you’re both working and doing everything you possibly can but the situation is not improving.

“The random bills, the inflation, how much is everything going to go up next week…next month? How much is it going to go up in April? They’ve already said that we’re going to be hit with our heating bills going up, but how are we supposed to sort that out?

“Everything is having a knock-on effect. I’m stuck and it’s hard. It’s really hard.”

Tasha is among those calling on the government to scrap the cap. She says it would make a huge difference to families like hers who, in her own words, are “at the bottom of the pile”.

“They (politicians) don’t see us,” she added.

“I want Keir Starmer to live a week in my life when you’re on the end of that monthly money and you’re living day by day, with no idea what’s next. You see that bill come in and you’ve got no money so how do you pay it? Are the debt collectors going to come? I want him to feel that worry.

“He needs to realise that all this inflation is having an effect on the people who are trying to do their best.”

Scotland has acted to offset the two-child cap with early signs of improvement but across the rest of the UK, child poverty is measurably getting worse and spreading.

In the era of austerity, lifeline family services were the first to be cut. Places like youth hubs and Sure Start children’s centres closed in many communities with no direct replacement. Teachers say schools are now left to fill the gaps.

Angi Gibson is the headteacher of Hadrian Park Primary School in Wallsend and the president of the National Association of Head Teachers. She has one rule for her staff – they must offer at least one after-school club per week to help parents stay in work.

She says schools have become the buffer for families in poverty: “Schools are stepping up to do more and more because our families are coming in with more poverty problems.

“With the likes of Sure Start closures, we’ve seen a hugely detrimental effect because of that. So much so, we have now set up our own two-year-old provision so that we can get in and do that job.”

Half of all children growing up in poverty are not reaching the expected development goals by the time they start school.

Angi says there are often days when reception teachers need to change multiple children in the class because they are not yet toilet-trained.

“We see a lot of pupil absences due to their health and wellbeing and that’s because they don’t have a fully healthy diet. It’ll be convenience foods that they can afford and it’s not because that’s what the parent wants to do, it’s because that is the only thing that is available to the parent.

“In my experience, it is happening now more so than ever.”

Doctors also say they are seeing the physical signs of poverty that they thought were confined to the last century.

• Subscribe to ITV News on YouTube: http://bit.ly/2lOHmNj
• Get breaking news and more stories at http://www.itv.com/news

Follow ITV News on TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@itvnews?lang=en
Follow ITV News on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/itvnews/
Follow ITV News on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/itvnews/
Follow ITV News on X: https://twitter.com/itvnews

Share.

37 Comments

  1. I was brought up in the UK from 1980 till 1987. My mum always worked and made sure we had good food on the table. She also put me in private school. She paid and my dad paid. I know it was hard for her at the time but the results she created in raising me were hugely beneficial later.

  2. If you depend on government's child subsidies and the government only allows two, then why do you have three, four and five children ? You are the reason why your children suffer from poverty. You are not being fair to your own children.

  3. The comments confirm that we live in a retarded age. People pointing the fact that these people had many kids being poor while not denouncing a system that doesn't allow people to have kids. Poor world.

  4. Here in Northern Ireland My parents told me, If you are not toilet trained by the time you reach Primary School (Kindergarten is called in america) age 4 and above you are not allowed to go. I dont know If this has been changed in more recent years or not.

  5. Everyone saying "it's the parents' responsibility " instead of "why do the wealthy get to hoard resources, causing innocent children suffer?" There is no excuse for this unjust system to persist in a developed country. Pregnancy and child planning are complicated, taxing the rich and ensuring livable wages should not be.

  6. If you can't afford large families then don't have them. Simple. Labour as always are encouraging a welfare dependency culture, and they expect taxpayers to subsidise other grown adults' life choices.

  7. I reckon Labour have calculated this will result in a net boost to their vote numbers, no other logical reason for them to be doing this now. I reckon they'll still lose miserably at the next election.

  8. @ mark 1:08…
    Tasha and her husband probably couldn't afford the FIRST child they had… but… SELFISHLY… they had 3 more!… smdh

    They didn't involve the Govt in their decision to continue to produce children… WHY are they asking the Govt to be included in providing & funding them now…???
    It's waaaay too many selfish adults on this planet… 😠

    "…It's my right to have children…" "..It's my right to be a parent…"
    It's also YOUR RIGHT… and responsibility to clothe, house, and feed them… NOT the taxpayers!

Leave A Reply