Worried teams are going to hide propulsion batteries in bulky computers?
Herr_Tilke on
Might be a move avoid a computer becoming a defacto aero bar. I agree that a size limit would be appropriate.
GalwayBogger on
126 mm x 71 mm is a limit? Movies have been watched in 4K on smaller screens.
Horror-Stand-3969 on
This sucks if everyone starts following this. I have pretty poor eyesight and anything smaller than a 3.5 inch screen gets hard to read.
SwampCrittr on
…. How many of you, are suffering from cognitive overload, from your bike computer?
jstrawks on
“Cognitive load”…a load of something, allright.
DRUMS11 on
I thought this was parody; but, no, it’s just the UCI. If safety due to data overload it a concern then putting the data on a smaller screen seems rather counterintuitive.
Hey, UCI! If you’re concerned with too much data distracting racers, just further limit the allowable data. Reduce the data, don’t make it harder to see.
Agent7619 on
Good thing I live my life according to UCI recommendations and regulations.
Morall_tach on
Oh good, the highest priority.
TransportationOk6990 on
This is just about the looks, isn’t it?
ghenriks on
The article says they have studies showing that the increasing amount of data is causing crashes, take that as one wants
But the key point the article points out is that current devices are within the new limits so no one is being forced onto a smaller screen than they currently have
stupid_cat_face on
My huge Johnson in my spandex imposes a cognitive load … cycling computers do not.
Aggressive_Ad_5454 on
This prevents some dopey bike-jewelry company from putting a giant tablet on a mount and using it for a head unit. And sponsoring a team for the publicity. It doesn’t seem crazy to me.
farrapona on
If they want to make themselves useful, just ban TT bikes already
16 Comments
< insert anti-UCI rant here >
🙂
Based
Edit: still ban the UCI
Worried teams are going to hide propulsion batteries in bulky computers?
Might be a move avoid a computer becoming a defacto aero bar. I agree that a size limit would be appropriate.
126 mm x 71 mm is a limit? Movies have been watched in 4K on smaller screens.
This sucks if everyone starts following this. I have pretty poor eyesight and anything smaller than a 3.5 inch screen gets hard to read.
…. How many of you, are suffering from cognitive overload, from your bike computer?
“Cognitive load”…a load of something, allright.
I thought this was parody; but, no, it’s just the UCI. If safety due to data overload it a concern then putting the data on a smaller screen seems rather counterintuitive.
Hey, UCI! If you’re concerned with too much data distracting racers, just further limit the allowable data. Reduce the data, don’t make it harder to see.
Good thing I live my life according to UCI recommendations and regulations.
Oh good, the highest priority.
This is just about the looks, isn’t it?
The article says they have studies showing that the increasing amount of data is causing crashes, take that as one wants
But the key point the article points out is that current devices are within the new limits so no one is being forced onto a smaller screen than they currently have
My huge Johnson in my spandex imposes a cognitive load … cycling computers do not.
This prevents some dopey bike-jewelry company from putting a giant tablet on a mount and using it for a head unit. And sponsoring a team for the publicity. It doesn’t seem crazy to me.
If they want to make themselves useful, just ban TT bikes already