Usually I got 26 spm using a cable resistance equal to 10. And my calories numbers are 180 or 150 ( in between) with ,20 minutes rowing.its good or not?
Ffs stop using cal/hr. No one who actually knows what they are doing rowing uses cal/hr and im tired of going into my gym and seeing that shit. That has nothing to do with actual calorie burn. Though I will say, solid form. Could be a bit better. Way too much vertical movement for my liking, but looked up a conversion for that crazy ass numbers and 1:43 for a rate 20 is solid, assuming you didn’t just crank the resistance up to 10. You didn’t, right?
Calorie burn is one thing, but distance is something else. Those of us who are more vertically challenged can't get so much distance on each pull, so we have to pull faster.
But don't go on the numbers too hard because the amount of calories you burn are vastly different according to age, atheticism, technique, size, time of the day, your last meal etc.
Just to make sure no one is confused, this is measuring output created by power not calories burned. Also, you can row at 30 strokes a minute @2400 cals/hour or at 22 s/m. This video is poorly done.
Dude that's not a horizontal power lifter machine. 1400 cal/hour is way beyond aerobic exercise. It's like running with 32kg dumbbell in a backpack — idiot's idea.
27 Comments
Usually I got 26 spm using a cable resistance equal to 10. And my calories numbers are 180 or 150 ( in between) with ,20 minutes rowing.its good or not?
Ffs stop using cal/hr. No one who actually knows what they are doing rowing uses cal/hr and im tired of going into my gym and seeing that shit.
That has nothing to do with actual calorie burn.
Though I will say, solid form. Could be a bit better. Way too much vertical movement for my liking, but looked up a conversion for that crazy ass numbers and 1:43 for a rate 20 is solid, assuming you didn’t just crank the resistance up to 10. You didn’t, right?
25 minutes, 20 stroke = 186 calories
Calorie burn is one thing, but distance is something else. Those of us who are more vertically challenged can't get so much distance on each pull, so we have to pull faster.
Caption missing. Reported for health misinformation
Maybe it’s just me maybe I’m in experience but as a rower it just makes sense to have better form over power gives you better results
contests run at 6 or 7 so I train 6 & 7
ist the chain sound normal on his rower? sounds rough
Bend your knees not your back, insane that youre going to try and critique others🤣
But don't go on the numbers too hard because the amount of calories you burn are vastly different according to age, atheticism, technique, size, time of the day, your last meal etc.
Wow calories a lot of work!!!!
stfu mate it all depends on how much power you put in. you probably pull some shi**y 8 min 2k
As true as 95% of the things you find on social media.
Phrasing this another way, form will do more for you than rate. Same with lifting weights, gymnastics, or martial arts.
Youre just rowing better what
This is so fake
This us not fake
The sound 😮
I was always sure it's the speed in meters per second. Idk what I do with my life after this reveal, I didn't expect thats about strokes
show the full video of 1400 cal/hr – you wont liar
Just to make sure no one is confused, this is measuring output created by power not calories burned. Also, you can row at 30 strokes a minute @2400 cals/hour or at 22 s/m. This video is poorly done.
High torque = more efforts
Give us your watts on the rower!
The difference is technique:
The first stroke: somone who cant row, the second a seasoned rower who likely had training and coaching.
Dude that's not a horizontal power lifter machine. 1400 cal/hour is way beyond aerobic exercise. It's like running with 32kg dumbbell in a backpack — idiot's idea.
I train on low strokes and it works for me. I can do 10 kilometres on 18 SPM and splits are 2.09.0 drage factor 125 I am 67 years old weight 72 kilos
Let’s see that HR though lol
This is at my schools gym and i love it