Oh they missed the turn and went straight…. Wow. If more people had to conduct themselves like a professional driver and look five minutes down the road constantly there would be fewer incidents like this in the world today. Look ahead people!
They are cyclists. They are entitled creatures. They probably thought the gate will move out the way of them because they are the most important people in the world.
Possible Legal Theories for Cyclists: A. Negligence
To succeed, a cyclist would have to prove:
Duty of care (did the property owner owe any duty, even to trespassers?)
Breach (was installing the gate without warning unreasonably dangerous?)
Causation
Damages
General rule: Property owners owe limited duties to trespassers—but not to willfully or recklessly injure them.
If the owner installed the gate without signage, lighting, or reasonable warning—knowing cyclists frequently pass through at speed—a court may find constructive knowledge of risk, and thus negligence in failing to mitigate foreseeable harm.
B. Reckless Endangerment / Willful Misconduct
If the gate was constructed:
Suddenly
With awareness of frequent high-speed traffic
Without any warning, then this could be deemed reckless disregard for safety, which can lead to liability even toward trespassers.
Some jurisdictions would consider this an “ultrahazardous condition”, akin to booby traps, which are clearly impermissible. C. Attractive Nuisance (less likely)
More commonly applies to children, but if the shortcut was a long-standing, obvious and appealing path, some courts might extend a limited duty—especially in urban/suburban settings.
41 Comments
Bro the dude on the scooter
The fenece have a camo color????
If you haven't painted that gate vivid red, you are totally an a$$…
This gotta be missing episode of jack ass
Someone please tell me there's a dedicated channel for this camera 😂
Who’s the original poster? I know they have to have more of these clips😂
Oh they missed the turn and went straight…. Wow. If more people had to conduct themselves like a professional driver and look five minutes down the road constantly there would be fewer incidents like this in the world today. Look ahead people!
I laugh every time I watch it!!!
Would it kill u to hang an orange flag from the gate .
Where's the lawsuit…am I right
what they get. anybody over twelve has no business playing on bicycles anyway. nothing but public nuisances.
The first one lmao
I'm impressed…Very robust gate…
Fuckin great
Is the gate alright?
That's a good question.
Absolute masterstroke putting that barrier there.
When I'm sad I come and watch this, brightens my day every time.
That dude got the wind knock
Read more…..
Sheffield Steel.
When the DM says you crashed into the Gate of Manual Breathing. This is how it went.
They are cyclists. They are entitled creatures. They probably thought the gate will move out the way of them because they are the most important people in the world.
I would sit in the window all day
Lol the poor breaks on the second bike 😂😂
How much you want to bet its the same guy each time?
I rarely laugh at anything but i crack up at this lol
I wonder if the guy learned his lesson after the third time… 😮
I am glad they didn´t see the gate. Otherwise I wouldn´t have laughed so many times bro hahaha
Gate has probably been open for years till some diabolic person realized how much more joy that gate would bring if it was closed. 😂
😂😂😂
662
Hope the gates ok
I want to see the conversation these guys try and have with the owner. “You can’t put a gate on your private property”
The trail around the gate progressively got made 😂
The unmistakable sound of someone getting the wind knocked out of them: HAUHHHHH! 😂
The last one is actually insane, watch it in slow motion. Dude got all the air taken right out of his lungs.
The scooter is the best 😂😂
scooter: Get out of my way
The gates: No actually Get Down
3rd guy may need EMS. IJS
Nah. Not as funny as idiots crashing their 'super' cars.
Possible Legal Theories for Cyclists:
A. Negligence
To succeed, a cyclist would have to prove:
Duty of care (did the property owner owe any duty, even to trespassers?)
Breach (was installing the gate without warning unreasonably dangerous?)
Causation
Damages
General rule: Property owners owe limited duties to trespassers—but not to willfully or recklessly injure them.
If the owner installed the gate without signage, lighting, or reasonable warning—knowing cyclists frequently pass through at speed—a court may find constructive knowledge of risk, and thus negligence in failing to mitigate foreseeable harm.
B. Reckless Endangerment / Willful Misconduct
If the gate was constructed:
Suddenly
With awareness of frequent high-speed traffic
Without any warning,
then this could be deemed reckless disregard for safety, which can lead to liability even toward trespassers.
Some jurisdictions would consider this an “ultrahazardous condition”, akin to booby traps, which are clearly impermissible.
C. Attractive Nuisance (less likely)
More commonly applies to children, but if the shortcut was a long-standing, obvious and appealing path, some courts might extend a limited duty—especially in urban/suburban settings.