Share.

7 Comments

  1. TryingNot2BLazy on

    well… it certainly makes rim brakes a problem… not sure if that’s what they were going for.

  2. Visual, I have a frame with asymmetrical seat stays and it’s no different than any other frame, and had another in the past and noticed nothing on that one too, spicers are nice frames though

  3. Shorter stays on the driveside mean less frame flex and more efficient power output when you’re mashing on the pedals

  4. Landshark, Spicer, Weis…. Asymmetric stays.

    No purpose. Similar to Hellenic stays (what the common person calls “triple triangle”, here). Triple triangle has been around a century or so (no GT didn’t invent it). Also, nothing gained from a performance aspect.

    I believe Yamahuchi was playing around with asymmetric stays as well, around the same time as Landshark. (Prior to Spicer, and all years before Weis)

    But the best fitting bike you can afford. That will have a bigger impact on enjoyment, performance, comfort, etc. Weird ass seat stays are just copy cat anyway. Everything else is personal preference.

  5. Any functional claims are apocryphal at best. Every company that does this makes incompatible, unfounded claims about their secret formula for the perfect combination of compliance and stiffness. Reality? It’s neat. It’s different. It’s fun. That’s the point.

Leave A Reply