Check out Venice AI at https://Venice.ai/preston
And use code PRESTON for 20% off their annual plan

Today we’re looking at the Ukrainian amphibious assault across the Dnipro in 2023. This event caught a lot of attention right away but slowly faded from the news cycle. A recent article by Ukrainian Pravda dove into exclusive interviews with leaders and marines involved in the operation to give us the best picture to date of what exactly happened over the course of those few months of fighting.

Source article: https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/articles/2024/11/18/7484985/

Between the Lines Research: https://prestonstewart.substack.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/prestonstew_
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@prestonstew
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/prestonstew_/
Contact: preston@warstories.co

Share.

31 Comments

  1. There's a German expression which perfectly matches these "allied advisers" – BESSERWISSER – "betterknower". For them this tradgedy is nothing but a chance to prove themselves before retiring…Sick

  2. 19:26 I'm glad you reported on this. I was curious then and I still am about this particular operation. The thing that stands out to me, is that at the time, the very people who had to do the operation were questioning some essential aspects of the plan. That should have been sufficient reason to reevaluate the plan. I'm not saying that they should have not done it, I am saying that there was a glaring mistake in the planning. We all know that planning does not survive first contact, but planning is essential, and more importantly good planning enables readjustment whereas bad planning does not. Had I been a civilian observer of this particular situation, I would have been screaming at the top of my lungs to tell them not to do it without reevaluation and probably retasking of some resources. Had I been a military observer, I would have been seriously talking to my superiors and making sure that I wasn't promoted ever again simply because I was such a pain in the ass and not a team player. Again I'm not saying that it should not have been done, I'm saying that reevaluation was absolutely in order

  3. Why would a journalist endorse a product that can create prompt-driven images about real time, real world events? Seems kind of short sighted, with how hard it is already to verify stuff in the Shitpost Era we find ourselves in.

  4. Id rather not have AI producing fake images of war to gaslight future generations.
    If you can't find realpictures or evidence of probably one of the most heavily documented wars in history so far you shouldn't be making shit up.

Leave A Reply