Share.

22 Comments

  1. Sorry guys, but your high speed trains get progressively worse. I thought the TGV M was already hideous enough but this train of the future thing is somehow even worse. Such a shame, as the original TGV Est was stunning.

  2. Nice train design, seems SpaceX inspired? Hehe. But boy these infographics and greenscreened videos of business people caressing their phones/beards…

    What are you doing with your axes? You know what -25% looks like? Not this 2:04

  3. I literally don’t care one word you say until you deliver Acela. How many YEARS behind schedule are you? 4 and counting.

    Get it together and stop projecting wildly into the future.

  4. Of course there's no doubt about Alstom's abilities but ,les mecs , that "généreux" compositing reminded me of doing "visual effects " on VHS back in my college years ..

    There's a saying : We don't want to know about it ,we want to see it !

    Avec amour de Montréal !
    ❤😂❤

  5. WTF was this? Alexis and Romain are possibly very bright minds, but they were very awkward in this video. Either they, were out of their comfort zone in front of the cameras or when speaking English. Absolute Fremdschämen!

  6. I wonder if you know the proportion of energy used that goes into traction versus the amount that goes into peripherals? I remember reading somewhere that at cruising speed, it's 60% traction and 40% peripherals (outlets, heating, ventilation, air conditioning…). This seems relatively low for traction, which is why I'm trying to find the source.

    Je me demande si vous connaissez la part d'énergie utilisée qui part dans la traction vs la part qui va en périphérique? Je me souviens avoir lu quelque part qu'en vitesse de croisière c'est 60% traction 40% périphériques (prises, chauffage, ventilation, air conditionné…).

    Cela me semble relativement peu pour la traction, c'est pourquoi j'essaie de trouver la source.

Leave A Reply