DETAINED IN BOOTLE!!!

Why is SHE DOING THE SEARCH ?

Lady pig couldnt get away fast enough…

In Irish mythology Neit (Néit, Nét, Neith) was a god of war🤬👿💀

This again should be a L/S i hope this doesnt end with auditor getting £50 . If this guy was a muslim when they cover their whole body nothing showing,it could be male or female,cops would leave these people alone.muslims are being respected by cops,or they are scared of them.

Little miss attitude was gutted when she didnt find anything on him. She just wanted to get away fast to find another victim.

Liars clowns idiots in costume, liars male matching description jokers. Man with a camera filming taking photos from a public place. When are they going to get it in their stupid head. Liars make it up as they go. Pace for taking photos of cars, snowflakes just want ID

Lying hag

There's no crime in taking pictures. which makes the search completely illegal . They couldn't get anymore ridiculous with their reason for their search.

Failure to provide a search record withouy reasonable excuse.

This is Gestapo Nazi attitudes don't talk to them . This is how it started in Germany during 1930's

well the main breach of s.1 PACE is the guidance , she used guidance of code A2.3 where it states
"reasonable (i)suspicion can exist without specific information
this code is known as 👉🏻 "" Personal factors " eg
avoiding police or
burglary's in the areas or
high crime area or
known to police of offences
giving us the evils
are Personal factors under code A2.3 ,
so ,, 🤔 I'll just recheck ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………AHAAAAAAAAAAAA
code A2.3 NOT USED since 19/03/2015 as 👉🏻""personal factors""" "was very bias , discriminating as it breached Equality Act 2010 ,, s.149 as of 19/03/2015
Personal factors can never support reasonable grounds for suspicion
code A.2.B states,,, Reasonable suspicion can never be supported on the basis of 👉🏻personal factors.

the following cannot be used, alone or in combination with each other, or in combination with any other factor,
as the reason for stopping and searching any individual,
(a) A person’s physical appearance
or the fact that the person is known to have a previous conviction; and

(b) Generalisations or stereotypical images that certain categories of people are

👉🏻more likely to be involved in criminal activity.
also as she cant use code A2.3 Personal factors
PACE section 1
(3) This section does NOT give a constable power to search a person or vehicle or anything in or on a vehicle unless he has
reasonable (ii) grounds for suspecting that he will find stolen or prohibited article
where PACE
section 2
(3) GOWISELY = 8 acronyms , 7 in uniform,,,is lawful requirement that ALL 7 acronyms must be presented code A2.2 2 tier test,, failure of all 7 the search will be unlawful (PACE section 1 (3) is the clue &PACE section 2 (3) (c)

(2 tier test not met (i) & (ii) both NOT met )

see link below , try not to 🤣🤣
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjpEjgX1Dl4&t=2s

so we know PC's will ever use code A2.3 as NOT USED ever again , don't we 🤷‍♂

which can be used

Marsh Lane, next to the Strand where Jamie Bulger was kidnapped and subsequently murdered. Yet they have staff to stop and search a photographer, who remember would be desperate for your video or photos if such a terrible crime were to be perpetrated today. Yet the police wonder why the public think of them as excrement and not worthy of the public’s support.

Are women allowed to search men? Can a man search a woman?

The British police are becoming so aragant

If the original report that led to the search under section 1 as claimed stated only that The Auditor was taking photographs of cars this would not constitute grounds for holding a reasonable suspicion of behaviour consistent with intending to commit theft from the vehicles.
The police were therefore exceeding their authority here.
If a claim has been made that The Auditor tried to attach something to a vehicle in the prison car park then without evidence beyond an allegation no prosecution, (of The Auditor) should take place.
A stop and search would be justified given that any officer instructed to carry out the search upon grounds of such a claim would be acting in good faith that the allegation was genuine.

The auditors video has gaps, does the prison video have gaps/blind spots?
If the allegation from the prison is false this is very possibly Malfeasance in Public Office which is a VERY serious offense!
Auditor says, "My letter states that there was no point taking this further and into Court because I might end up loosing in Court."
Who's letter, a letter from The Auditor or To The Auditor and if the latter from whom?
It's not clear from The Commentary exactly what is being claimed to have occurred here. More and clearer/less ambiguous information is required.

A lot of behaviour here consistent with confabulation, (lying) by the police. If they lied in order to facilitate infringments upon The Auditors rights then this would be Misconduct in Public Office via Malfeasance.
If The Auditor has sufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that one or more persons in Public Office
told such lies then he may wish to try taking them to Court in order to enjoy watching them run frantically about for the cover of charges of lesser offenses.
If he manages to document their antics he may find himself with yet further grounds for charges of criminality, ultimately against a Chief Constable or Judge.
Members of The Public cannot mount prosecutions for criminality, (criminal prosecutions) but they can enact civil prosecutions against people like The CPS for failing to do so. (Non-Feasance/Mis-Feasance). Even Malfeasance via Mis-feasance!

I don't usuallly have much to say in their defence but to be fair, they didn't cuff ya.

do they lie this easy in courts how can they trust a word that comes from them .

You cannot trust one word that they say

Unlawful detainment should be classed as assault and you should be allowed to defend yourself against it. I don't think that those two officers would have lasted five seconds against a man determined to defend himself..

Screw your definition of self. I’m a living bloody man

You can always try a private prosecution. You can claim your money back via that route.