[Session 3] Japan-Germany Expert Forum

Opening
(1) Welcome addres by METI
Ms. Miho Kawamura (Director, Manufacturing Industries Strategy Office, Manufacturing Industries Bureau, METI)
(2) Welcome addres by BMWK- The paradigm shift in data utilization: The establishment of the International Manufacturing-X Council
Mr. Markus Heß (Deputy-Director General, Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action(BMWK))
(3) Trustworthiness for Value Chains　
Dr. Wolfgang Klasen (Plattform Industrie 4.0 AG3 / Siemens AG）
Ms. Ayaji Furukawa (Industrial Cyber Security AG, RRI / Toshiba Corporation)
(4) Digital twin usage and standardization
Prof. Dr. Fumihiko Kimura (Chairman of International Standard AG, RRI / Professor Emeritus, The University of Tokyo)
Dr. Michael Rudschuck (DKE(German Commission for Electrical, Electronic & Information Technologies), head of the Industry Department )
(5) Introduction to the topics discussed in Japan: “Innovation in the Digital Age.”
Mr. Kiyoshi Mizukami (Robot Revolution & Industrial IoT Initiative Advisor)
(6) Japan-Germany collaboration on manufacturing data spaces
Prof. Dr. Shinsuke Kondo (Chairman of Manufacturing Data Space AG, RRI / The University of Tokyo)
Mr. Henning Banthien (Secretary General, Plattform Industrie 4.0)
(7) Announcement of International Manufacturing-X council
Mr. Thomas Hahn (Plattform Industrie 4.0 / Chief Expert Software, Siemens AG)
Mr. John Dyck (CEO, CESMII)
Prof. Bronwyn Fox (Chief Scientist, CSIRO)
Mr. Kazuo Nakashima（General Manager, Industrial IoT, RRI）
(8) Closing remarks
Dr. Takashi Hotta (Secretary General, Robot Revolution & Industrial IoT Initiative)

The Robot Revolution and Industrial IoT International Symposium 2023
＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿
Robot Revolution & Industrial IoT Initiative
https://www.jmfrri.gr.jp/english/

I so hello uh I’m hotter I’m the Secretary General I’m going to be leading the closing remarks of this session so today we’re talking about Japan Germany collaborative efforts back in 20 16 uh we look had a joint statement with regard to digital efforts and we’ve been working bilaterally on that and today we’re reporting on the progress that we’re making ahead of all the presentations that we had we’re going to have a few opening remarks from representatives of both the Japanese and German governments beginning with Ms Mio Kamura the director manufacturing industry strategies Office of the Bureau of manufacturing industries of meti hello everyone thank you for that introduction I’m from mety my name is ky mura so ahead of my opening remarks I would like to first of all express my thanks to Mr Hess director deputy director general of the German government as well as RI and those Associated here in this forum and also I would like to say thank you for all of the efforts to all other Personnel involved in putting the syum together I would like to express also my gratitude from for everybody who has attended and shown interest in this event from this morning there’s been some very interesting sessions I personally uh from mey I have been watching so talking about the manufacturing industry and the importance and criticality of data linkage and how to deal with that I think there’s been a lot of really imaginative discussion and ideas which have been described today so for example res having more robust supply chain looking at environment looking at Human Rights and due diligence so talking about risks and also supporting legal and Regulatory aspects not just that but also leveraging data to be able to generate new business models so that you can add that as additional value to your own company so that that becom sustainable competitiveness those opportunities and potential is something I think many of you will have held having heard the presentations at mey once per year we produce a white paper assoc for the manufacturing indust this fiscal year 2023 inside that white paper we talked about the external environment that’s significantly changed for the manufacturing industry and also in order to respond to those changes you have to get beyond the boundaries of a single company you have to look at the industry as a whole you also have to go beyond National boundaries to be able to collaborate internationally and also the key is digital linkage and digital collaboration that’s a message that we contained in our white paper now in terms of actually putting that into practice data collaboration needs to be successfully leveraged to be able to produce new models and many businesses are being able to do that now that is something that is becoming a key for future growth that’s something that we’ve covered in the white paper for this year so based upon that at mey we’ve been talking about putting in place the right environment for business so across Academia industry and politics we’ve been looking at initiatives for leveraging data so we started coming up with an ecosystem we’re trying to find ways to do data collaboration so in terms of Japan German collaboration 2016 March that’s when with Germany uh the German government and MTI we produced a joint statement and as the department that is in charge of implementing this rri has been performing a really big role in those intervening years at this session now we’ve had more than 130 meetings of experts talking about standardization industrial security as well as of course today’s main theme which is data collaboration so we’re going to have presented to us the outcome of all of that effort and discussion and at the very end of the session we’re looking at going Beyond just Japan and Germany and looking at some of the global moves the international manufacturing X Council we’re going to be talking about that I hear that there’s going to be a presentation on that so this is going to be a first presentation before it goes out into the world I’m very very happy to hear that it’s being presented here at this Symposium first it really reassures me about the strength of the relationship between Japan and Germany I hope that this is an opportunity for further intern ational collaboration going forward through this Symposium today for all the stakeholders involved the importance and possibility of data collaboration is something that I hope you recognize and that you take that away into your own areas of expertise and specialism and if you are in business that you then embed that into your own company so that you find concrete ways to move forward I hope this is a trigger for you to do that I hope that this continued Symposium effort will be great in terms of outcomes those were brief but those were my remarks thank [Applause] you thank you very much Miss kaura next please switch the slide to welcome Mr hes of BMW k Dear kavamura Son dear hotan ladies and gentlemen um thank you very much for the invitation to the afternoon session for the industrial iot International Symposium I’m very grateful to be here it’s a pleasure as always and it’s as fruitful as um the uh predecessors of this Symposium in the German Japanese relationship there has been a lot of proof that we can trust each other that we can build upon each other’s um experience that we can work jointly to find Solutions and that there is um a longstanding and trustful economic tie web so to speak we are proud that we can look back at a long understanding and fruitful cooperation also between the platform industry 40 and RI on today we’ve seen once again we’re all committed to drive the digital transformation of our societies and industries so in short the fourth Industrial Revolution is in full swing looking at industry and the challenges ahead again this Symposium underlines the future of Industry will be datadriven no doubt about that it is about enabling databased Innovation applications and business models the change that is necessary is cross sector torial borders leaving silos across countries in the end across the globe that is a consequence of an globally intertwined interl industry of today the the focus in in this respect is therefore shifting to cross company collaboration covering the whole value networks it is a real challenge since it requires a joint understanding how to use data in open networks and how to create the necessary trustful environment if you allow me a personal remark the trustful environment were quite experienced when I look at roughly 70 meetings on working group level between our experts in rri and Industry for it key role will be the digitalization of global value chains as one of the key enablers for a more competitive resilient and climate neutral economy One Challenge is to establish digital sovereignty this means giving to companies and leing with companies the control over the use and sharing of their data in short they remain in the driver’s seat throughout the entire process and as I said earlier on Industrial Supply chains and value networks do not end at National borders a global approach is undoubtedly required for the sake of business for the sake of the development and it’s plain to see that digitalization and data is key and base for every business uh in the time to come and it serves companies as well as countries and it saves money and it cut it cuts costs so the creation of global datadriven ecosystems is the next major development it will transform industry across all sectors there is a need for a truly Global approach so to make change happen the international manufacturing X initiative has been launched it’s threefold first to connect value chains and Manufacturing data networks across Industries and countries second implement the global foundations or for datadriven resilient Sovereign and climate neutral production what colleague has mentioned and enable Innovative value cre ation in an interoperable and Sovereign data ecosystem from my personal perspective it is important that it is connectable and easy to use especially for the small and medium-sized Enterprises which make for Germany 85% of our business the lower the threshold to join and to make use of it the better because ultimately there is no viable alternative to a databased internationally interl industry the German industry will get involved in these developments and we are at the federal government willing to make our contribution to the successful further development of international manufacturing eggs companies and government are only contributors to the success to the common goal we do our share and we invite others to do as well because from our perspective government and companies we only can together form the digital transformation and together we can ensure a competitive and a successful industry of tomorrow in this Spirit of trustful cooporation and learning from each other and enhancing our cooperation I wish you a very good Symposium and fruitful discussions and thank you very much for your [Applause] [Music] attention thank you very much Mr hes now we would like to move on to the sessions the presentation uh we are not planned for a Q&A time time uh for this um session from the YouTube link QA link um please use it for your questions if any with your name and your [Music] business so we will have [Music] um a presentation a session uh on trustworthiness for Value chains from RR um industrial cyber security AG we have Mr furuk from Toshiba and also of M Dr Classen from seens and also from platform industry 40 aj3 over to you hello everyone I am from Toshiba I’m fukawa I work for the industrial cyber security Ag and this is Mr Clon Germany and engaged in the industry platform industry so today we will talk about the industrial um work group we will IND we will talk about what we’re discussing so the contents are here this is a quick we’ll start with a quick introduction and also we will talk about the trustworthiness in Supply chains and value change trustworthiness supporting infrastructure and then Dr Clen will share topics um of Germany and Europe and then we will close with our future outlook so this is a quick um introduction of our group industry security Action Group has Tosha Hitachi Mitsubishi heavy industry Med and Sony so major Japanese manufacturing companies are all members our common goal is to address industry 4.0 across borders um information and goods will be um traveling and what are the security conditions needed for that and also mutually for digital businesses to connect there’s a lot of informational exchange data sharing was a key topic this morning and how much from a security U perspective can we um promote um trustworthiness is the key yes and what we do in the security working group of a platform industry for all we develop recommendations for actions and concrete application examples for secure networked industry and in this case security and trustworthiness is a central key factor for a global value chain with International standards and continuous awareness for security so manufacturing businesses in Japan and Germany come together to share knowledge and experience to work on security as um common area since 2016 the Hanover m held every year we um we share our uh white papers to for example share our ideas about the trustworthy next chain now next how we um why we discuss about the trustworthiness supply chain trustworthiness I will share the background so there are more supply chain attacks even the companies are prepared um there might be direct indirect um partners that could uh be influencing them for those attacks and there are many stakeholders um involved in the morning DX digitalization were the topics in manufacturing site DX with AI and Cloud are increasing the risks and in EU cyber resilience act and other legal regulations and even Japan um manufacturing economic um laws um about parts um and products um now are more required with applications for security so for the main um manufacturing um makers that come together from both Japan and Germany is because efficiently timely we want to make sure how we can do Post Productions and also how we can build trust with other stakeholders and how smoothly we can build that relationship is the key and our motivation trustworthiness is something that I’ve been referring to here in this session and in our group the definition of trustworthiness we refer to ISO ability to meet stakeholders expectation in a demonstrable verifiable and measurable way this is our definition so the first area we tackled in supply chain the trustworthiness the organization’s um trustworthiness and the suppliers uh manufacturers first transaction with um the supplier how trustworthiness can be secured we thought about these areas this diagram shows um a general um supply chain scenario first product services are provided from suppliers and then to be delivered to the manufacturers or customers there is a retail Distributors and manufacturers and Distributors we have trust domain and Trust interaction points that we introduce As A New Concept trust domain means TR trustworthiness in the definition we made and these are units that Define the trustworthiness could be organization it could be part of an organization supply chain is made by trust domains and Trust domains discuss and agree interaction points is mean the interfaces of different trust domains trustworthiness concept it follows the trust supply chain to build um trust trustworthiness profile t or TWP so when they when the manufacturers um choose their first when they make their first choice of suppliers they base it on trustworthiness to meet the expectations suppliers will show what they can do so they will show their capabilities the trustworthiness profile has the capability and also the expectations written there this is how the supply chain trustworthiness stakehold between stakeholders can be established and that’s what we thought as a possibility next I will hand it over to Mr clent about for the train of trustworthiness uh security approaches and also security standards which can be used for Supply chains but uh what is missing is there’s not a A harmonized or singal standards uh suit Set uh yet which provides Assurance for multiple nodes which supports automatic processing what we of course need for industry 4.0 and also for um digitalization of this industry which includes interoperability uh between different notes which enhances scalability yeah um which is scalable from the application point of view and which preserves confidentiality and privacy privacy also in the case of business privacy because not every stakeholder uh wants to get all the information free for every other stakeholder so this has to be controlled in a certain way it has to be managed by uh for stakeholders and we don’t have the standards available yet thank Supply chains trustworthiness is our topic here and in the morning [Music] sessions and as we heard in the earlier sessions um for cular society there is the echo design digital passport product passport idea in Europe in the all the steps in the LIF side of the product of design specification and disposal of all the information will be digitalized and the data can be shared among different stakeholders trustworthiness in supply chain has been a discussion Point goods and services flow was what we paid attention to but when we think of the overall value chain value has been an also also an important topic and also to secure data trustworthiness what does it take what does trustworthiness need we realize that we have to discuss about that as well trustworthiness when we think about it in the supply chain the importance of the data is imminent trust worthiness in supply chain um different from that we have new challenges that we’re facing product users is or consumers not only limited to them but we have to think of the trustworthiness end to end until the last stage scalability clear governance will be also required and the supply chains indirect users could be using um data so that’s an area another area of trustworthiness that we have to think of privacy confidentiality or other considerations and for multiple different Supply chains and value con connections should be considered for trustworthiness as well and the data of goods and product related information data with more services based on that the trustworthiness of the services and um trustworthiness of data of these products are also important with these challenges trustworthiness is a value chain uh what does it mean we are having discussions with the members in Germany so next looking at the supply chain trustworthiness and the supporting infrastructure that will be needed this year in Spring there was a white paper which was published which talked about a trustworthiness repository a trustworthiness depos repository is between entities on the supply train looking at trustworthiness expectation and sharing of capabilities expectations and capabilities is incorporated into the trustworthiness Prof profile refer for both sides of the entities on each side and is uses digital evidence in the trust rep worthiness repository there will be the linkage information that’s tied to the trustworthiness profile the trustworthiness profile can be open to anyone and throughout the supply chain it’s connected together so trustworthiness profile data includes information on both authenticity Integrity which would be required through the supply chain we do not wish unauthorized competitors to be able to reach this data so the confidentiality of digital evidence is also needed additionally with regard to digital evidence to be able to have higher levels of trust ability we want to use trust anchors to be able to achieve this next from Mr Classon I’m going to ask him to talk about some additional information relating to supporting infrastructure yeah thank you you so um such a supply chain trustworthiness needs a supporting infrastructure which uh can be composed or will be composed of several building blocks which I uh want to explain here a little bit uh what we need uh of course are secure identities of entities and entities in this regard are stakeholders but also uh products and components so we need secure identities for products and components and we need secure identities for the stakeholders which are part of this supply chain um we need a trustworthy infrastructure for realizing Mis identities and such an infrastructure has to be Global position has to be worldwide and has to be unbiased it has to be nondiscriminatory and and robust I will come to that later on we need verifiable proofs for entities which proving the required uh property which entities of course can also be against stakeholders or also products and the verifiable proof uh could be a certificate which has to be bound to the product or has to be bound to the stakeholder and this binding along the supply chain has to be secured by appropriate mechanisms so such fat evidence can be can be calculated uh at any time and at any stage um in in the supply chain uh processes also um we need mechanisms to exchange groups along Supply chains and we need for all of these suitable International standards as building blocks International standards means ISO I jtc1 or typical seos which are really Global accessible for every National body and um build their standards on on Mutual agreement so to make it clear the mechanisms for such a infrastructure do exist from the technical point of view f is not rocket science it’s not new but to build these things together and provide the infrastructure that is a big challenge which we have to meet and uh this challenge has to be met also for other reasons which I come um back later on a little bit uh when we talk shortly about the digal product passport so for requirements for such an infrastructure it has to be glob globally clippable and scalable we have already said privacy confidentiality preserving we have said Integrity authenticity and accountability it has to be used easy to use is very important it has to be accessible for small medium Enterprises uh companies have have to be able to use it but also have to be able to leave it without any problem after using it it has to be robust available and resilient so we have to be careful that not big players uh have the possibility to disturb the existence of such an infrastructure there must not be a single point of failure so it has to be decentralized decentralized or uh distributed and not a centralized infrastructures um as we have for for other uh examples already implemented it should be able to support distinct trustworthiness requirements because not every product has the same requirement on trustworthiness not every business cases need uh fully cryptographically um covered um trustworthiness yeah this has to be uh we have to be able to apply it on demand but we really need and nevertheless there has to be a clear governance which is nondiscriminatory what I already said and which is unbi biased and we do not have any construction in the world at the moment which is able to provide such a clear governance for Global use so going forward um I just want to give some examples where people in Germany and Europe are discussing such building blocks there’s one example where we have a couple of funded projects which are discussing the so-called Sovereign identity approach uh which is based on w3e uh re standards and usually from the definition is covering uh identities for individuals and organizations but what we do at the moment also we are checking whether this approach is also applicable for iot components and iot products uh here we of course have a scalability uh Challenge and uh we have uh also a very different uh challenge which is also connected with Solutions like DPP if we have such a um secure identity infrastructure used for for products for Industrial Products this infrastructure has to support such a product for maybe 20 30 40 years that’s the lifetime um of of an industrial product and this is very long especially when we think about having cryptographic function functions implemented in such an infrastructure which usually has have to be updated after 15 years or something like that and uh of course this this comes not for free yeah we have to think about mechanisms which really are able to support uh such a construction um it doesn’t also I want to mention there is a new work item at tc65 uh which will uh when it’s finished also support this life cycle issue uh this work item is defining um events uh along uh such a uh value chain uh specifying Event Services information models and semantics for the interoperable information exchange between different stakeholders and once we have such a that this is a a very very uh important building block where we also can uh build um security and Trust peret tret related information on that now where is a um um um there’s a regulation coming up in Europe which uh was launched in 2022 um from uh ecodesign for sustainable product regulation Mis regulation comes from people who want to control material flow for sustainab sustainability reasons and circular economy reasons so for this um dig the product regulation there is already a standardization committee uh founded recently on September 20 uh in s selc which is called dig product passport and this regulation is with with committee um has a goal to Define um to to Define harmonous standards which can be used by companies uh which want to implement uh digital product passport and you see here on the line um below um information which is on the on the bottom stand ization work on dpp4 now what is dpp4 dpp4 is based on the concept of this German Association for electronic industry and uh the idea is to to base such a digital product passport for industry for zero components or for industrial components on existing on new IEC standards which are called dnp for z f the standard for digital name plant and for the so-called asset Administration shell where I know that people also from your country are very engaged in the definition why I’m showing that on the talk about security the point is the idea behind is that this asset Administration shell uh implementation of a DPP carries information for different purposes one purpose is of course information which is free accessible by everybody who has access to the product and who has an access also to the information which has to be provided by regulation by everybody who wants to sell this product but with the similar mechanisms the idea is that there is information linked with this product with which is not free accessible some of the information may be accessible only for regulatory purposes but some other information f is block number two on Digital Services may be made available for digital uh use cases for uh the people who want to make money with data and want to make money with data which is produced with a product during the product’s life cycle f is U the opportunity F Digital Services can be delivered together with a product and with a data from the product in the the market by people who are manufacturing uh B devices so and of course if you want to do that then we again need this trustworthiness infrastructure because what what is behind that is some sort of e-commerce for data which is connected with a product and when you want to deliver such data with a product during with a full life cycle of a product when you again need to support such a customer Fitness infrastructure for the full lifetime of a product and that’s a big Challenge and for standardization people in Europe just now I think they are realizing what the consequences of that is this is something which does not come for free yeah this is something we need new ideas and that is something that the community need to build with infrastructure uh which has to be robust uh during for full lifetime that’s your ah okay future outlook of our cooperation between Robert Revolution initiative and platform industry for all in terms of security so we want to uh further look into methodologies for trust R for products and derived information for products in value networks we will have a look at certain use cases we will check and look how manufacturing X digital ecosystems are related to our work which we have done during the last years and I think there’s a lot of uh relation to that yeah because manufacturing at the end they also need this sort of infrastructure in the in the back and uh what we will do as a first step yes so up to this point we’ve been in our presentation talking about the value Network the value of chain trustworthiness change so data sharing is something that we’ve been talking about a lot and thinking about security and the importance of trustworthiness we’ve been putting that together in a white paper so next year at the Hanover messay we’re planning to present that so we’ll have some delicious white asparagus alongside our white paper in Germany thank you so much for listening to our presentation today thank you very much hi thank you very much you too at G7 the fft is being discussed that is the lowest bottom layer of data Flow Free flow and then today’s discussion was more something closer to application next from the expert panel we have two speakers Professor Kimura and Mr R Shar and digital twin usage and standardization we have Professor Ameritas Kimura and we also have DIN and vde technology and electronic DK Michael brishak will take the podium thank you very much I am willing to discuss the smart digital related discussions I will give you the overview of the discussion whereas Mr R will share with you the situation in Germany now digital twin covers all artifacts to promote sustainability and the importance is something that we would like to highlight in this presentation and I would like to discuss material circulation and cost [Music] circulation here you can see the bullets first I would like to discuss the positioning of the expert panel before revisiting digital twin and usage of digital twin use cases before concluding with the issues and challenges going forward digital twins are in use in many different ways but this presentation focuses on the definition of set under three digital twin Revisited first about the expert panel German Japan expert panel is about the standardization of smart manufacturing it discusses important topics around this area to further promote collaboration specific issues in include areas that demands International standardization issu this exhibited and considered important then ISO and IEC will be buted against to discuss further standardization now in eliciting all these challenges we have taken a topown approach as shown on this slide smart manufacturing is still evolving this means that we have to have a future Vision so that standardization can be further promoted application scenario is a high level description but forther Target before starting technical details we come up with an application scenario to discuss the requirements needed for future standardization this chart shows application scenario with this business view use cases are analyzed with usage View and functional view by uses view blackbox method is used to analyze the relations between the users and providers we also discuss technical treatment needed before going into the details usage view Target of analysis needs to be understood in a deep manner to keep ourselves oppressed with an overall view now from usage to functional views there are several interesting challenges that I would would like to bring your attention to First meaningfulness of digital twins for manufacturing or social activities social sustainability needs to be improved to this end digital infrastructure supporting social Affairs is indispensable in this segment digital twins can play a pivotal role smart manufacturers can benefit greatly from digital twins not only that digital twin is an indispensable element needed for the world’s transformation now talking about global environmental issues ipcc intergovernmental panel on climate change of un FC has made it clear that anthropogenic activities is having a negative impact on this planet and and that is a scientifically proven concept manufacturing and other industrial activities impacts Affairs of this planet and that is why we need to improve the situation there are several good news ipcc report suggests that social change can or transformation of our activities can also reduce EnV mental burden on the planet this also means that efficiency in manufacturing can be achieved and this can be a strong motivation to promote smart [Music] manufacturing diverse and complex factors related to sustainability can be summarized as follows to for environmental sustainability we need to reduce waste to that end product and other activities needs to be visualized here modeling can play a key role so that we can track the activities and in this regard digital twins can play a major role because that can play a pivotal role driving these gos let’s discuss future Society structures from a verd point of review our society be it appliances I information Technologies automotives or power or space systems are all indispensable elements that supports our lives also there are some intangible assets as well these artifacts have been provided through manufacturing processes when manufacturing becomes more digitalized artifacts can also lead to a creation of a digital twins in the cyber world digital twins product and Technology agnostic interoperability can be ensured if that can be ensured digital twin enabled social Affairs can be synchronized leading to creation of new values for for example in agriculture agricultural machines and activities distribution of food processes processing companies can be linked together the same can be true in the medical and Health Care Systems as well this is a more concrete depiction of the roles digital twins can play for social Affairs digital twins is designed to to be useful in social activities as shown in this chart modeling functions of the digital twins can Le lead to the promotion of reuse or reconstruction this modeling function needs to be established to have the digital twins to be cross uh linked in a cross seual manner semantic interoperability is as is an assumption to promote data linkages to this end digital twins can play a major role in this presentation digital twins usage and functions are the topic of this presentation business us usages and application will be discussed on a different occasion now let’s take a look at the definition of digital Twins and basic functions before discussing standardization and its related elements recent years digital twin has become a Hot Topic there are some specific requirements including standardization there are different definitions of digital twins depending on the domains of activities from a design perspective this is one of the most widely used definition a digital twin is a digital representation of an active unique product real device object machine service or tangible accet or unique product service system that has three major components one is a physical entity in real space second is a virtual entity in Virtual space and most importantly physical and virtual entities are communicating both ways with sufficient flow of data between the two over 40 years physical entities has been modeled with product modeling technology modeling in and of itself has been an established technology especially over the last 10 years modeling has been supported by developed information infrastructure so the connection between physical and virtual entity has become closer and bidirectional from the usage perspective there are certain modeling inter actions as shown on this slide current applications of digital twin um relate to self- production execution processes so um the models are built in respond to manufacturing equipments in the physical world and the information flow between them is more simple but in real world a model in the cyber world may be planned and designed and an entity in the physical world constructed in response or conversely a model may be constructed in the cyber world by information from entity in the physical War the relationship and information flows of these models are complex and the modeling capabilities for such needs have not been developed enough this is an example the cyber world and the physical world interaction so a prototype so the versus the cyber world plan in the physical world there are many prototypes that will be created and then for one product there could be um various um application models in the cyber world when you think of the entire life cycle for each phase there will be detail scales and other and there might be supply chain and assembly and the model um units would be different for example and with or without models and the relationship between the cyber world and the physical world there are many elements to be considered so how can they be organized in the harbon is a big challenge so we will talk about the ideal model to solve this challenge later based on the discussions that we have uh we are um thinking of standardizing the requirements so still um the essence is not um sufficiently understood so through the life cycle of entire life cycle of artifacts the digital twin is a dynamic by directional relationship between the two worlds um implementation for application is developing rapidly but there is still a lot of work to be done to ensure that all the complexity is addressed so um to reduce um complexity to achieve full life cycle operability and to establish a dynamic by directional relationship between the Cyber and fisical world uh we think that standardization of digital twin is very important so we need to have more discussions between the experts of Japan and Germany but um this list shows standardization topics related to digital twin and um when we think of standardization in individual application areas these are going to be the basis reference models architectural Frameworks are complex and um involves a mixture of issues from many different areas so it is essential to um standardize these areas and in semantic inability interoperability across different activities technology and product area is important for Effective application of the digital twin I can give you a concrete example uh cbon footprint um integration in the global supply chain in order to um to um calculate the CO2 emissions according to specific conditions as a context we need um the supply chain um description um as data for digital twin and that has to be established as a common context description so we need to establish a common basic concept So-Cal ontology to meet this need a generic ontology is a difficult task but um for each um area if we for the basic areas uh we can take approaches to standardize and then integrate them and um although not this this is a specific standard this is a reference model for digital twin that has been proposed so we have eight coordinate axis dimensions and their aspects search model is is a standardized common IEC 63339 reference model uh urmm for smart manufacturing so this is an existing standard and um we have compatibility with it [Music] so as a reference model standardization the the relationship with this should be discussed so the reference models coordinated accesses still have certain rules and restrictions so we have to use them depending on the purpose so this list might be ad hoc includes some ASP ad hoc matters but there are some examples so we need to um continue to organize these so and to create a coordinate library of coordinate accesses and aspects this is going to be an important challenge for the future as an example we have Remy 4.0 or reference architecture model industry 4.0 so um it is an attempt to classify the various use cases of digital twin and analyze the interner relationship by setting up coordinate axis so in red of are the abuse cases that are not fully um established yet so we need to put more consideration in them and this we are still going through trials and errors but we hoping this approach will help to identify the gaps between the current state of development and the necessary use cases for Effective development so this is our approach for the semantic of interoperability for individual um applications we have definitions um across different um Industries we need to think about the difficulty of inter Opera of the different standards so we do need a cross-sectional um setting and this is not going to be realized um in a short period but this is an avoidable an unavoidable task that we have to be continually addressing this also shows you needed data and this is one of such examples about eia data environmental performance evaluation data which has not really come online but data ontology is now being constructed as a dictionary so that it can be referred to to evaluate the eia within digital Twins and and interoperable construction of such eia is indispensable I’m running out of times I will pick up my Speed Carbon foot print calculation at the motor construction CO2 emission was calculated standby data can be extracted if you want to do so but you have to contextualize when you are going to do that the same can be said about the supply chain data extraction as well when you’re telling up all those Footprints either case appropriate onology needs to be the basis of digital twin based calculation i’ said in order to achieve this semantic interoperability is something that needs to be established that also means that the relations between data needs to be established so that semantic data model needs to be created this is EP environmental performance data information model and this is one example of such description engineering data can also be defined and lots of R&D has been promoted but it needs not never easy to make it as a general purpose model and I’m in order to drive all these views functional and usage views should be the basis to collect use cases digital product passport example is being treated on this slide and that is something that my colleague will discuss and I will give the microphone son so let’s come to a small intermetzo and I will explain you why we as standardization organizations are so focused on the digital passport um if you we heard today a lot of uh lectures presentations about uh the digital product passport digital twin and um you have seen that they are more based on on a let me say academic um focus but today the digital product passport is not a academic gimmick anymore the EU commission released the proposal for the ecodesign regulation for sustainable products on March 13th last year and the digital product passport will be an essential part of this regulation the digital product passport is here to reol the way we will govern our physical products it’s like having a digital IDT card for your products complete with its own passport photo a unique digital fingerprint but if you take a look at the proposed EU regulation it’s not cutting edge technology we are talking about technology from outer space the technology has still arrived always keep in mind that the first pass will be a blueprint for all others so we will start in Europe with battery textiles and all kinds of electronics but the concept is so generic that in future we will extend it to all other products so you will agree that in terms of sanitization we can afford any mistakes here and you will see on this Slide the time scale so today we are talking about 2023 we are in the middle of this timeline but you see at the end 2027 the EUR commission will issue first product passports so the at least we have four years for standardization which is a very let me say uh ambitious game [Music] so coming back to standardization at the moment um there’s no decision made how the regarding Fin and Technology will be but the asset Administration shell or what we call DPP 4.0 is uh at the moment leading the race without going into details here I will only refer to the German standardization roadmap industry 4.0 the link is below on that slide so you can download uh um this uh standardization road map and uh see what’s behind our concept what’s behind of our concept we propose for the European uh digital product passport so the digital product passport is no rocket science you will see that all used Technologies are really known and based on established concept so here in our concept we are starting with a QR code or barcode or whatever RFID chip and with a suitable reader uh we can come to an web service with an underlying database so there’s nothing new about this concept it’s only the way the data are compl it’s only new that the data are completely interchangeable between all stakeholders and all during the life cycle and that’s the point where we as standardization organizations join the game the picture show a candy box with a digital name plate which had been already already presented 2019 so since 2019 we were working on this concept and for this uh standardized barcode you QR code um we have meanwhile an international standard which is the is 6146 where also Japan was in lead so meanwhile we extended our uh Concepts at a demonstrator in corporation with the zve and um here we integrated uh digital standards digit digital certificates and also um we had an program where you can calculate the carbon footprint uh which um was produced for this particular item so if you have an iPhone on of or mobile phone you can scan the QR codes and then you will be led to our internet sites on the right links to the demonstrator and also the uh QR code on this dummy product is still uh valid so now back to kiman thank you thank you so maybe I missed the time three or half minutes 3 minutes left sorry okay so also there are several uh sorry uh so we are considering some use cases for example for reusing things to for reuse we have to um think of non-conventional data that we didn’t use before and we have to um respond to the new digital twin requirements so this is a list of the needs of of the data and some of the information it not be being explicitly considered which needs more consideration in the future this is um a use case of using electric vehicle battery but in the interest of time I’m going to skip the details and in Japan in the Japanese industry is often said that a new um concept to try to have um switching a huge um heat treatment um system into a compact one so it is difficult to try to reduce trial n if we um use the conventional approach so we have to efficiently do production for the 2B situation and with um if we have like um cyber world should be preceding a method which um physical ities are constructed and that is going to be a critical technology so finally I would like to think of the consideration points for digital twin there are a lot of research development and application already in progress ISO IEC jtc1 has um informed the templates and there’s a lot of that have been already accumulated standardization work um not limited to Manufacturing in a wide range of Scopes is progressing activities are moving forward extensively so working on reference model um is also very active so we need thorough review of these activities to accurately understand the current situation and the future Trends and then we are still discussing with experts from Japan and Germany but we have these potential Focus Scopes number one the scope of smart manufacturing we will examine the reference architecture of um digital twin uh with a view to widely apply it in the society and um as for the basis secondly we will need to um develop further use cases and analyze them for inter oper semantic interoperability Improvement we need semantic model and with deep consideration this closes my presentation thank you very much for your kind [Applause] attention thank you very much on the subject of digital twins physical being modeled in Virtual environment there are a variety of different methods for doing that we don’t want to get too scattered an approach on so thank you for presenting all that information we’d like to move on to talk about a presentation regarding business ecosystems uh this is from Mr Koshi mizukami RI WGI advisor thank you very much Mr mizukami I’m an rri adviser my name is mizukami thank you for giving me this opportunity today so first slide please please today I’m going to be talking about R’s activities in terms of the special interest group number nine this is the content that we’re covering that I wanted to present to you all I’d like to begin back in 2015 at this International Symposium I was talking about the importance of producing new value in 2018 from kagam man Professor Kagan we heard about the B2B platform economy and he posed the question is that something that could be discussed subsequently platform industry 4.0 with Mr Wolf leben and others we’ve been talking about um what kind of systems could we have on the other hand in Germany industrial value creation is something that is being viewed very critically and talked about a lot today from Dr Otto he covered some of this in his presentation one of the purposes was joint Innovation I believe as the patterns that he described Innovation itself is of course Very broad I’m not going to give it a definition for this for but thinking about innovation in the digital era what does that mean from a Japan research Innovation academics group we’ve started with their help to looking at this this is what I propos to cover today on this slide next I begin with the activity purpose our hypothesis is innovation will change in the digital era Innovation will be going into a different dimension to what we’ve had up to now that was our hypothesis if that is the case then how will Innovation change what will it become how will it be different from before today I’m going to try and cover some of those topics this is the membership of the people who have been involved in this discussion and debate we’ve had multiple conversations and I’m going to be sharing the outcomes today beginning with the approach let’s base ourselves on a use case looking at industrial data exchange and other data sharing through that what kind of thing could be doable let’s take up a specific example from what we’re familiar with now and imagine where that would take us based on that we can look look at innovation in the digital era and attempt to Define what that means let me go into the content starting from imagining from a use case the use case we’ve selected is something you’ll all be very familiar with Uber Eats during the coid pandemic Uber Eats became very much used by many people so let’s think about industrial data sharing and data space if we were to evolve this what would happen you’ll all be familiar Uber Eats is a delivery focused service it connects restaurants and users creating a new relationship that didn’t exist before in other words it’s new value A New Concept which was born from this of course if we think about it in the terms of digital you use your smartphone for as a new interface you might use electronic payment methods so there are some new mechanisms that have come into play on the other hand new challenges were born from this too for example taste the person who’s delivering do you trust that delivery person and if you think about gig economy gig workers what is their labor environment this was raised as a concern solving these and evolving forward is something that’s been happening so the team we talked about this we discussed this and said these might be areas where there could be connections with a variety of different sectors via a data space maybe you could get involved with regional agriculture so that what’s grown in the region is consumed in the region or thinking about health Consciousness coming up with healthy recipes as a service or thinking about experiencing something beyond your normal daily lives you want to experience something special that’s one of the reasons why we go to a restaurant it’s a special place so a rental space industry and we were thinking about those with low incomes providing food in Japan we have these volunteer food facilities that serve inexpensive or free food to children so maybe that could be something that could come from this these were the kind of things we imagined in order to do this what should be done what need needs to be done so for example thinking about a restaurant makes food then you eat the food thinking about that process it sounds very obvious you generate a menu you procure ingredients you cook the food you eat the food as part of that though again it seems very obvious in terms of information being handled if that information is being handled in a standardized way then you could very easily connect with all those other services that we imagined around what was happening now that was our first outcome of our discussion so through this a variety of different stakeholders and a variety of different Services could be connected here is our hypothesis so let’s think about innovation in the digital era what does that mean what did we gain from the use case one of the things we identified is the labor process and the information that’s handled in there the business process and its information if it’s standardized then it looks like it would be pretty easy to connect across sectors into other domains also from the use cases the use case that we looked at materials design used by customers all the way through to disposal you could connect people with experiences and things so we thought that there could be linking of different domains in the real Society out there there are many existing Concepts and preconceptions like Uber Eats in Japan there’s a word deay it means that somebody from a food facility when they have a bit of time on their hands they step out and deliver some food so that was a preconception and we’ve been able to shift into a New Concept which has created this Uber eat mechanism so extracting the New Concept forming the New Concept and connecting that with other sectors and domains if we can identify all those things then it’s possible to embody and create new values and concepts with digital we’re able to do that so much more easily and that was one of the conclusions that our discussion reached in other words that this is the characteristic of innovation in the digital era having said that if we’re going to push ahead with this there are still a variety of things that we need to study and consider we need to form a new concept we need to make it take shape what do we do to do that we still haven’t figured all the details out we’ve identified a few examples here and furthermore ultimately this needs to lead to active economic efforts and activities and support will need to be provided whether in German Europe or in Japan talking about a system of systems talking about shifting to ecosystems these are per company per individual per country not really realizable and having scalability to develop those further there has to be a wide variety of collaborative effort as part of which what should be industrial data exchange or industrial data sharing naturally standardization need to be included in there business models need to be included in there to identify how we can create a Cooperative area and domain in Japan that discussion is still very challenged and working with people outside of Japan we hope that we can move that discussion forward that’s everything that I wanted to suggest as of today’s Forum from myself and I hope that this will lead to the next step in activities thank you very much that’s it thank you for listening to my [Applause] presentation thank you very much this is still a topic still at a very young phas so this is also the area that we have to work on going forward now collaboration of manufacturing data spaces German Japan collaboration manufacturing data spaces Professor shinski condo remotely will join the discussion he’s a chairman of manufacturing data space a and to be followed by Mr Henning banan thank you very much for your kind introduction I am condo of U Tokyo this our collaboration on manufacturing data spaces will be covered by myself and Mr B uh platform industry 4.0 next slide please these are the points that I would like to cover why we are doing this and what we are doing in Germany and in Japan and the thought processes that we have before conclusion we would like to discuss how to promote collaboration between the two and our initiatives to further promote collaboration we be covered next slide please first and foremost let’s take a look at the background as you are aware manufacturing environment in uh industry’s environment is changing dramatically being social changes or economic changes with the rise of the block economy and politically there are a number of changes going for going on [Music] through these changes regulations have been created and Ai and other technologies have also entered the society further driving the changes in the society and these are the realities manufacturing Industries are F phing individual companies or single country cannot deal with such Mega Trends or changes we need to maintain the manufacturing capability at the same time dealing with all these changes that can only be done by working together in areas possible with all the other stakeholders collaboration and cooperation requires cross sectoral data space and creation of the data spaces for better utilization now data sharing or data space creation when we are trying to do that what can be the challenges and hurdles first and formost data space and data collaboration is something that is easier said than done but they have different levels of granularity when you’re talking about these things be database or data collaboration what are their definitions including interoperability or data testing or resilience or data sovereignty what do these all mean for all the players in the landscape that needs to be more deeply understood against this backdrop we have been working together between Germany and Japan and activities we are promoting needs to be understand mutually understood better so that we can also explore opportunities for further cooperation next slide please now this is a message from Professor Kagan please roll the video distinguish guest ladies and gentlemen about 10 years ago uh the final report of the working group industry 4.0 was presented at the Han of comp to the German Chancellor and the International Community the Strategic project started already in 2010 under the impression of the severe economic and financial crisis our goal was to strengthen the economic competitiveness by lifting the industry to a new level of adaptability and sustainability resilience was also a Hot Topic the resilient Factory the first use case described in this report in particular the plug and produce capability was mentioned that means that you are able to seamlessly replace an equipment by equipment from another vendor or to extend the setup of the production floor according to new demand another important topic was business model Innovation future business models are based on Smart services and smart services are delivered on demand they are tailor made to customers needs and uh a kind of a product service bundle that cannot be provided by a single company but more from Dynamic digital ecosystems across Industries to build resilient value chains it’s mandatory that you now can also easily substitute a business partner in an ecosystem by another one or extend the ecosystem by a new one so the requirement of semantic interoperability that was raised by resilient Factory is now extended to all three dimensions the technological the business and legal aspects which makes international corporation even more important to understand the motivation and the approaches from other countries aratech uh conducted in 2017 a study industry 4.0 in the global context commissioned by the ministry of Economics of course we found differences but uh uh also common objectives that were on top of the priority list of all countries uh semantic interoperability by means of international standards data security and data sovereignity and the enablement of small and mediumsized Enterprises small and mediumsized Enterprise enablement can be achieved by giving these companies easy access to test bets and international corporation and and that’s what theps network industry 4.0 has achieved in the past which I believe is a great successful proving international corporation in practice however in particular the small medium-sized Enterprises were reluctant to share data in particular sharing data via Central digital platforms but as we know sharing data is necessary if you want to manage the corporation within digital ecosystems as well as a collaboration between ecosystems so the appropriate solution are open and Federated data spaces with some architectural guidelines that support the trusted data exchange and guarantee uh data security and sovereignity as requested from all the interviews at the same time we finished a comprehensive study on the impact of autonomous systems in All Phases of a Citizens daily life uh at home on the road and at work and uh the study confirmed the conviction of most experts that autonomous systems are mandatory to achieve the degree of adaptability and flexibility needed to implement industry 4. though with that uh we have two additional challenges one is the interaction uh between machines and humans the Gap is closing so the interaction is becoming more more similar to interacting with people in Digital Society so together with experts from Japan we investigated the future of human machine collaboration and agreed how important it is to understand the historical and cultural background uh of the respective countries in order to find common Solutions the Second Challenge is machine to machine Corporation in particular in distributed Global setups and to provide the guaranteed latency and bandwidth which is needed and the answer is not the let’s say original two-tier architecture that was shown 20 12 and 13 like uh smart machines on premise and public clouds it’s more a multier architecture a kind of an edge Cloud continum which ranges from Smart machines on premise edges Telco edges to the cloud provider the manufacturing X initiative takes all these findings into account it aims to implement this centralized and collaborative data spaces for smart manufacturing Industries the ambition is to set up a global foundation for resilient Sovereign and climate neutral production and no country can achieve this alone international corporation building on the positive experiences and the achievements from the past is crucial to success so the is establishment of an international manufacturing XS council is a promising and future oriented step and I wish all of you great success for a powerful start to lift international corporation to the next level all right then thank you to Professor Kagan there we go so taking up um the line of thoughts from Professor kagam man and the historical view he has taken just um uh The View on what is happening right now in Germany and in Europe I built three blocks Mega Trends sort of what are overall developments then regulations which are driving developments uh for companies in Europe and then the market demands about the mega Trends we have already spoken quite a bit in uh during the day today and in the recent panel but you know you see climate change as as a challenge the digitization shortage of um skilled labor um or geopolitical uh developments as we can see them at the moment um the other part is regulations which is uh highly relevant for the work of companies um and I guess it is similar here in Japan as it is in Europe that government does plan on various levels um regulations regulations looking at the very field we are active in namely the digitization and I just give you a snapshot of what is happening currently or is enacted or in process in Europe on a regulatory basis now you don’t need to read this right um but you can see very easily how complex it is and how also you know the the risk is out there that um some parts of this regulation won’t really be consistent um and challenge-wise this plays out on different levels it’s on a company level how do you as a single company actually act with all these regulations but it’s also on an international level it’s not only within Europe but it’s also for companies from abroad Japanese companies us companies if they work in Europe they have to uh follow these regulations so again as it was also mentioned in earlier talks the challenge for companies will be to find a smart way of actually dealing with this multitude of of regulations and find automated ways and smart ways of actually implementing or um yeah operationalizing these kinds of regulations I’ll come back to that in a minute regarding Market demands you see the aspect of speed naturally is something very important so here in Europe uh in Germany we are looking very much at the cases we already have like ktina X or the S Administration shell to enforce and speed up the implementation of digital Solutions added value is always very important for example what has just been presented to you the digital product passport or uh Solutions around PCF and lastly clearly enough Innovation is super important so how do we drive an AI or a databased economy or automated processes software as a service solutions and now again what I think is interesting to see is how do these things need to be linked up so if you look for example at the mega trend of climate you link it with the deal package regulatory package around the green deal in Europe and then you can as a company look at very specific Solutions like the digital product passport which can enable and and facilitate and make life much easier for companies to actually work um in this regulatory environment and also respond to overall challenges we’re having and as a final slide on the activities in Europe you see here a compilation of the various activities are that that are taking place right now so you see players on a more regulatory uh level who frame um conditions on this overall uh level then you have organizations who actually Advocate coordinate formulate um uh the operational level of of data spaces what is to be thought of as as fundamental building blocks um then on the governance level there are players who specifically look at the governance issues we’re having and then players who actually help to on a technological level think through and operationalize the idea of um data spaces this is then in the at the bottom part but you need the entire ecosystem to actually be successful in driving these Solutions and having said that back to Professor condo uh uh thank you H now let me introduce what is happening in Japan next slide please this is what is happening in Japan Society 5.0 is something that I would like to start with Society 5.0 as you can see on this slide is closely linked with social and economic challenges it intends to balance at all these factors including but not limiting limited to manufacturing activities and that is the initiative being led by the Japanese government this covers not only manufacturing industry so there are lots of different players on the part of RI Society 5.0 as led by the government we want to serve as an En enabler with the manufacturing X there are lots of different players as far as Society 5.0 is concerned including data data ex working together with these stakeholders we are currently exploring the definition of the data space in this country at the same time promoting Mutual understanding with our International Partners next slide please against this backdrop Action Group 4 was launched this year as an initial step we are currently working with member companies to explore the situation based on use cases there are lots of different terminologies and such discussion can can be interesting but shallow with limited depth in discussion and understanding so we are paying particular attention to use cases for companies and businesses Society 5.0 economic benefit and increase in corporate value that can possibly be balanced out with social agenda but sometimes they don’t but it is important to strike out the balance and it can possibly be achieved if you can wisely use data space and that can be one of the major motivation on the part of the companies so what kind of incentivization is possible that is one of the questions that we are currently discussing and then what kind of concerns can companies have having joined the data spaces and that is the use case based discussion we have started this year in terms of thematic discussion the first question is the clarification of the motivations or the factors that can motivate players on the part of the corporate players and on the part of social Affairs second theme when trying to enter into the data space there are factors Concepts or factors that may invite some concerns what kind of concerns can be possible for each use cases and how are these concerns are being explained and described and these are the questions we are posing to better understand the possible concerns companies or other stakeholders can have so in terms of motivation and concerns we are trying to understand this in a concrete Manner and we are also trying to extract techn technological challenges that needs to be overcome going forward data space driven engineering and Manufacturing are also being explored in the working group as well and that is what discussions are being take taking place in our working group and I’ll give back the microphone thank you so what we have now prepared is is looking forward to our next steps and with I mean Nakashima son condo son and savila son you have heard before we were putting our heads together and uh having heard what has been said so far what we want to do now is really to look towards interoperable manufacturing data spaces develop Concepts between the two countries to come up with a definition of common interests we have um identify potential collaborative areas for Innovation for the further development of manufacturing Industries and also to discuss sort of what are core building blocks of of data spaces and then to disseminate that joint understanding in our communities um in the respective countries in order to do that we want to write a joint paper um and uh have this paper for our mutual understanding but also as an input um to the international collaboration and this is just roughly the table of contents we’re looking at for this um joint paper um so uh you see sort of after introduction Etc we want to focus on what are drivers of change what actually motivates us to build um data spaces what are the current um uh situations in the respective countries but then really to describe what do we understand as data spaces what are design elements what are learnings in the two countries so to pull together these learnings and really out of the activities you have in Japan and we have in Germany and Europe to do something joint uh and um with that to inspire also developments like manufacturing X and the final step I think is really for us to Define what then can be specifically very completely be done with whom what could be the potential Partners in the country to join forces and actually do um Implement and and work together on data spaces and in that sense um also here is our sort of call for participation to you all um so if you’re interested in this topic please um contact us um and U uh you know if you want join our activity regarding the joint paper but also in more General if you’re interested in collaborating on data spaces then um please feel free to contact us and uh then AR thank you very much for the attention thank you very much so the subtitle of this Symposium is um data linkage and we will joint our forces to approach this so this is the last topic there is an announcement with the international manufacturing ex Council so Mr Han from dos platform industry 4.0 seus and also Nakashima son uh from rri we have uh video messages from the states and also from [Music] Australia thank you very much this is the last part of the session we are actually a bit behind schedule so we might go over um three minutes or four minutes sorry in advance up to here we have been talking about the collaboration between Japan and Germany and now as the last part we would like to step make one step even forward so we would like to talk about the inter International collaboration and we have some information to share with you as International manufacturing ex Council uh we are going to do an announcement some unveiling and I want to share some information about that so first Han Mr Han will talk about International manufacturing ex’s current status and also our next steps and then in addition and people from other regions who have been in the discussion U Mr John Dyke of sisi and also from Australia we have cyos SOS Miss bronwin who is the chief scientist so they have information about their regions and also how what they expect on um our effort we have video messages from them which I would like to share with you and then at the end uh for closing we will share some comments so that will be the flow so Mr Han please thanks nashim and you see it we do it together we switching over the position as needed also a very good signal and sign for for for cooporation and you know you know you have heard a lot uh during the complete day um during this great uh Symposium about what is needed what are the challenges what are the opportunities and now Nakashima done we have to get it done together and that’s let’s say what we want to show you uh what we want to make and really it’s for me a a great pleasure uh to announce this together with you here at at this location and as you said before we have also Med video message it from America tronik USA from Germany or Europe from Japan Asia and and from Australia really to show us this International aspects you know um when we are starting s and I have only some slides um and when we not hopefully not to overrun uh so much um in the timing uh a little bit explain why we are doing this the why part was a lot of covered before what how we are doing this and who is doing this really you somehow a little bit the background and also the the spirit in what we want to do this so now I’m coming back to to this slide and I will not dig into the details of this slide don’t be afraid of um uh but I give you you know uh andout meage why we are doing this you know uh Marcus has has said this before when you’re speaking about yeah the three-fold uh approach or the threefold topics about connected value chain international data driven and you know enable also value creation I would start with with with an example and you know um Professor kumasan mentioned also you have seen this curve about the BR carbon footprint uh you have heard in the in the in the morning U during the panel discussion from from Ingo and from haen about uh Kina X I think you have explained this as a theoretical carbon footprint uh when you have along the supply chain now we are speaking how we coming to a real product carbon footprint and to make it let’s say very concrete we have Al to optimize this it’s not only uh about uh uh reporting is also to feed it back in doing this and when you know and I’m very sure a lot of people knowing uh the percentage of the CO2 emission which is let’s say where let’s say production is is behind is u a higher double digit number so doing something this it’s important that’s the reason why I used this again uh this use case uh because when you’re going down to an shop floor you see maybe don’t ask me 10 20% of the uh CO2 footprint let’s say the so-called scope one and scope 2 you see it about what energy you’re using where you get the energy from from what material what the production process uh is is consuming and what is emission out of this but you know a major part uh is U maybe 80 70 80% is in the the Upstream where you get the the material for the production or in the downstream when you’re speaking about um uh let’s say uh where the should produce product is used in this environment so meaning in a nutshell when we are not speaking uh together about uh what is on the Upstream part what is in the downstream part what are the different products uh we are using what are the different steps we are using uh when we not using this and calculating this and optimizing this you know um then we have a we cannot achieve this what we want to do achieve or must achieve or should achieve when we’re speaking about in this example this is stainability example regarding prodct carbon footprint and as you can imagine and this is somehow the the bottom line uh nobody can do this alone or I like to use Boris words he make it very short we have to team up I think uh so just bring him a little bit on the spot um uh what we have to do and since is let’s see a little bit to describe a why you have heard a lot of things about this in more details during the day uh what we have spoken about let’s uh go a little bit uh to the to the how we are doing this you know the sustainability part I have just covered you know you know all the other topics resilience think about H’s word about uh chip shortage or let’s say uh rare um material uh needs how you can handle in supply chain to make the supply chain more resilient uh and of for sure at the end is somehow where we can really achieve some kind of competitiveness so that’s what we want to Target and how we are doing this is this is here and or why we are doing this is here you see it here on the left side this ring with different verticals on the upper part right you see little car Cina um or an automotive vertical then you see the Machine Tool building industry this is don’t ask me robot system you see the process industry you see energy uh when you have this plug for the cable as example and an and the meaning these are all a little bit depending to each other uh for sure one solution does not fit everything but to have it interoperable to exchange and necessary data to build up a decentralized data ecosystem as um um as written here in the headline is is somehow key and what we have to achieve have to fulfill the targets the impact which youing here on on the on the right side when you’re looking uh about uh say how a little bit about how this we could structure this I know this is a little bit a top level view uh uh on on on on the on the framework what is behind uh this manufacturing Circle which I mentioned before then you have here on the top for sure we have to create something we have to create some impact you know as targets we have here also and I think inco mentions this also before in his presentation about new business opportunities you know with with data with data economy we can yeah optimize more make more efficient our existing processes but also we can look for new opportunities as meaning also to new business opportunities uh like we have shown before in the service Parts uh and the productive maintenance and when a part is needed to know it in advance of course is also let’s say very good business opportunities and bu Revenue plant is also very good example from from sustainability use case so only to give it then we have yeah use cases uh we uh I think every now successful organization is very use case driven you see here some examples of course you can extend the list of use cases when you’re other going to other uh verticals uh and so on and you see here on the button uh shared services aset Administration sh is mentioned Eclipse data space uh connector is mentioned in the beginning um from hen and later also from from Boris Auto the digital product passport is mentioned the qer code which have shown um where you can identify let’s say um uh um the product or can access to the documentation of the product you mention this let’s say in the context of Regulation I can tell you from industry is also significant business use case because you have not to ship don’t ask me tons of of of of documentation you can it access as it is but also access let’s say a digital yeah twin let’s phrase this also the instance or the type data when you make it in a technical world and all about is you have to build up some of kind of framework regulatory framework and and and and standards this only to give you an an an an and top level overview when you’re speaking about the landscape a lot was mentioned before and by the way before for um with a foundational framework they give us also a lot of topics where we can address and will address joint developments I think for use cases for Shar services and so on when you’re looking at the landscape looking at the left side um you see a lot of of of of initiatives first line are somehow mentioned two are present today you see you know this we named it infrastructure initiative meaning Isa namey data uh name it Gia X looking what is what is topic what is needed and you know on the button you see Al the standard and regulation only as examples I see Shinji for example where we are together at the OPC Foundation at the boort by the way also wonderful Corporation um where we can address this standard sitation topic as meaning we have somehow to bring this U what we want to achieve somehow let’s say in a in an in an in an yeah and a way to orres we need it to cooperate we need it to influence and use where some systems some infrastructure is there and to Define and Lobby were needed when you speaking about uh uh standards for example that what we want uh uh to do and you see here this uh green box this is all about what we want to start now uh the international um manufacturing ex Council Hing caraman mentions this before and uh also several time also from the two representatives from government was also mentioned before that we have to do this and will do this must do this or however which word we we are using the spirit is open cooperation in a partnership to Define what we are we are just working here on a or have produced the first version of a Playbook how we are doing this to show this and I said before it’s not only not only our exercise uh pleasure to make it here by the way I have to say it again but you see here also on the bottom line some other logos from other initiatives uh around the world from from from Canada from some countries of of of of of of Europe uh from Australia um uh the logo is still missing but will come soon and you can imagine uh and I’m very sure sure when this is announced I think a lot of partners are let’s say in this area active but take with you is a joint cooperation an open cooperation we want to achieve something we want to make something together we want to create impact we want to orchestrate an influence when necessary when you’re speaking about standards and we will exchange uh you know uh the um uh the Lessons Learned which we have here is only for you a little bit an overview you get all the slides there are also some additional slides in the back about how we are doing this what are the precise content is um but uh not to overstress you and we know we are the last part but maybe a famous one hope of this uh session uh that we are um targeting this and for sure next step would be announcement in in Europe and and us it will be on the October 25th in some days we will today is the first announcement and we have the second one and then we will see what is coming um um we will have and uh Marcus has mentioned this also and we have discussed this by the way yesterday in our meeting we have to describe what is the data ecosystem also touchable for small and mediumsized Enterprises I think we have a lot to do uh also besides the technical stuff uh to bring it let’s say communicable and understandable and and usable uh also for the uh especially for the small and medium size uh Enterprises yeah we have to set up the collaboration and uh sorry to say this we have TR tuber together so many things and short and hopefully not so boring overview what we’re going to do many second thank you very much so next we have a video from the US distinguished guests ladies and gentlemen it’s an honor to address you today from the United States of America my name is John Dyke and I’m the chief executive officer of the Clean Energy Smart manufacturing innovation Institute also referred to as the smart manufacturing Institute I’d like to briefly share with you who we are and share with you the nature of the work we do here at sesme and close with our continued commitment to partnering with Japan and the newly formed International manufacturing X Community to engage in a global Initiative for resilient Sovereign and climate neutral production sesi was funded in 2017 by the department of energy as a program at UCLA to dramatically reduce the cost and time to implement smart manufacturing here in the US our aim is to create a more competitive and productive manufacturing operations and supply chain and we do that by investing roughly $200 million in advancing our technology our Workforce Development and our ecosystem strategies to to democratize Smart manufacturing what we mean by democratize is to reduce cost and complexity by engaging the manufacturers the systems integrators and Consultants the machine Builders the technology providers and Academia to to innovate around the major challenges that we believe will help us accomplish our objectives for the United States of America we fundamentally feel a sense of urgency around accelerating the adoption of smart manufacturing here in the US we understand that the last three decades of Manufacturing Systems investment has left us with significant technical debt stovepipe architectures and data silos and that our more Innovative more agile smart manufacturing future will involve much more interoperable and open systems sustainable and energy efficient outcomes and secure scalable and resilient architectures we believe that that’s how we engage not just the large manufacturers but the small and medium manufacturers as well who who today are really struggling to implement these capabilities and for whom we need to focus on the accessibility of these types of strategies and so we believe that this focus on interoperability and openness is something that we can’t do alone that we need to be working as a global ecos system to advocate for the standardization of the appropriate architectures and information strategies on ecosystem engagement and more recently with the creation of international manufacturing X the manufacturing data space development activities we’ve had a great track record for almost 5 years now working with our friends in Germany at the platform industry 40 working on the recognition that manufacturing is global that Supply chains are Global and that manufacturing revenues are Global this is it’s really important to recognize that our manufacturing communities need us to align and harmonize and drive standardization around these important interoperability initiatives and so in working with our friends there in Germany and more recently in Japan uh it’s been a privilege to develop practical strategies and then demon demonstrate those outcomes the way we did in Germany at Handover fair this past April around a joint demonstrator rout demonstrating a real practical approach to product carbon footprint reporting and measurement and and that’s the sort of activity that we believe we can continue to invest in to advocate for the kind of transformation and harmonization that we think will help our man our Global manufacturing ecosystem along the way we forged some great relationships with uh these organizations but also with the great leaders uh that are part of these organizations like Henning banan Thomas Han Dominic Rus Matias Bela and others these bilateral Partnerships have been an enormous value to our manufacturing Community here in the US and this is why we’re excited to be a small part of your official announcement today regarding inter International manufacturing X we too wanted to stand alongside you there in Japan at least virtually and express our support for you and for this important International initiative to improve further sustainability resilience and competiveness in manufacturing this is not anything that we can do alone and the topics we know we need to work on collaboratively with you and the rest of this community include the exchange of project best practices and less learned trust Frameworks regulatory requirements and the international standardization necessary for scaling up let’s work together to establish a data economy for manufacturing and let’s work together to ensure the success of the international manufacturing X Council in conclusion I wanted again to express my appreciation for this opportunity to address you today we are excited to engage with all of you there in Japan and the rest of of this great Community to advance these vital strategies so we had the CEO sism from America Mr John Dyke thank you very much we have another one thank you very much for the opportunity to speak with you all today in this very important event in Japan I’m particularly grateful to the manufacturing X team my and my friends Thomas Han and Dominic Ras with whom I’ve been working with on the delivery of Industry 4.0 initiatives since 2016 industry 4.0 created an enormous paradigm shift for the digitalization of production Technology and Manufacturing X will be the next major wave of innovation as we transition to the data economy my role is the chief scientist of csro and for those those of you who don’t know us csro is Australia’s national science agency and it’s one of the world’s largest multidisiplinary Science and Technology organizations we provide all levels of state and federal government with scientific evidence and Analysis to inform policy making we work with thousands of businesses both large and small across every sector of the Australian economy and with every major Australian University we employ 6,226 people in Australia and around the world at 53 sites in countries including the United States and France we collaborate extensively across the Indo Pacific including with our quad Partners India Japan and the US to lift resilience in the region and Tackle shared challenges like climate crisis csro has had the pleasure of collaborating with Japanese organizations since the mid 1980s across a broad range of universities research organizations and the private sector sector and we have had many many successes together for example we collaborated on the Ultra battery developed by csro and built by furar battery company it’s now powering hybrid electric vehicles in Japan we work together to commercialize barley Max a high fiber H grain with enhanced nutritional benefits developed by csro and commercialized by tayin under the name super barley there are now more than 30 related food products in the Japanese market and Tajin is expanding super barley across Asia we’re working together on today on several renewable energy and hydrogen projects including the hydrogen energy supply chain project and others csro has a long history of innovation in close partnership with Japan and I look forward to helping that continue as in my role as Chief scientist want to briefly touch on cso’s Research strategy 6 years ago we transformed csro around the big challenges and opportunities that we saw coming for Australia challenges and opportunities that we share with the world that included a shift to climate mitigation and adaptation digital transformation agile manufacturing and a one health approach to protecting Australia from biocurity threats like pandemics it s us refocus our research and commercialization efforts around the six great challenges that we face as a nation these are our food security and quality a secure Australia and region our energy and resources our health and well-being the resilience of our environment and the innovation in our Industries 2 years ago we announced a program of missions to help Australia tackle these challenges and we’ve now launched missions to end plastic waste catalyze a new hydrogen industry build resistance to Drought produce more food more sustainably and transform our agricultural exports more recently we have launched missions to tackle antimicrobial resistance protect our waterways and Coastal environments to boost resilience to infectious disease accelerate an industry Pathway to Net Zero and to convert Australia’s critical energy Metals into higher value products and protect our biocurity we are co-leading these missions with broad coalitions of domestic and international Partners across the university sector government and Industry because the challenges we Face are challenges we all share and they simply cannot be solved by one organization alone we’re looking for more Partners to join both our launched missions and the missions that we have in development so if any of these areas align with with your own goals don’t hesitate to reach out one of cs’s largest business units is data 61 with more than a thousand people focused on creating Australia’s datadriven future cso’s data 61 is at the Forefront of digital science and Innovation leading leading both in developing new research as well as working across disciplines and sectors to apply Technologies and drive impact data 61 ‘s three major priorities are to drive the development and Adoption of artificial intelligence in Australia including through cs’s leadership of the new National Artificial Intelligence Center and the Next Generation AI graduates program to put digital and Science and Technology at the heart of Australia’s recovery and resilience to help solve our immediate challenges and to help us anticipate and prepare for future ones and thirdly to reinvent the way science has done using digitalization to revolutionize the future of scientific discovery including Technologies such as AI data 61 are at the core of all of our missions supporting This research with a data driven approach we see opportunities to collaborate with Japan on decarbonizing industry and on eliminating plastic waste through a circular economy both areas of significant research and investment for csro including within our missions program we recently launched our Plastic Innovations Hub in Indonesia and Vietnam as part of our indopacific plastic Innovation Network and we are looking to expand that work in the region and just briefly on the hydrogen front I’m also aware that our hydrogen industry Mission hosted a delegation of Australian researchers to Japan last December and they met with the Japanese research Community to explore R&D opportunities to accelerate a hydrogen industry in Australia and Japan if you’d like to know more about that I can connect you with our hydrogen Mission we’re really excited about working on all of these initiatives which have a datadriven Approach at their core with the manufacturing X team to bring together Australian industry Partners to harness the power of the global data economy and we’re looking also to working looking forward also to working with our great friends in Japan thank you I so before we wrap up from Germany any comment short Mima son we have to do it y looking forward for the [Applause] topic just do it you know we promise something we showing the network capabilities we show all the challenges you know it’s all the not so small topic but we’re addressing and I said before we can must should many thank you thank you very much inside the country outside the country have a lot of collaboration partners and we will excel our partnership to be interoperable and useful uh manufacturing xor to be built thank you very much everyone [Applause] thank you very much at rri our Japan German collaboration will be the basis for our International activities and we hope to continue to work on that very briefly I would like to give some clothes in remarks today we have been joined by Mr H Mr Han from Germany thank you so much for being here and also as shown on here we have been blessed with with many supporters in terms of sponsors this year and I would like to offer my grateful thanks to all of our sponsors at rrii we have picked up two big areas of activity robots and iot today’s Symposium was more about the iot it’s one of our big events for iot iot is supported by this structure that’s on the screen in front of you now at the very top we have our two chairmans our joint chairmans Mr Dr iier from hitach and Mr murakami from ihi they of course joined our panels earlier on in our earlier sessions we have four action groups which are there we have University professors who support that so that there’s collaboration between industry and Academia that’s a key feature of our team here on this next slide this shows us in the field of iot one of the key things is German Japanese collaboration as you can see here today we’ve been talking about these four different themes these are the things that we’re engaged in right now and we want to produce outcomes and results based on this with this we want to be able to come up with meaningful proposals to meti in Japan with that that is very much the end of our events so far in terms of our International Symposium for 2023 I thank you all for your participation thank you