
Here’s the rankings for large cities – the full article has the medium and small cities too!
Riverside, California – 20
Santa Ana, California – 20
Virginia Beach, Virginia – 21
Raleigh, North Carolina – 21
Mesa , Arizona – 22
Stockton, California – 22
Newark, New Jersey – 23
Lexington, Kentucky – 23
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma – 24
Miami, Florida – 24
New Orleans, Louisiana – 25
Cincinnati, Ohio – 25
Los Angeles, California – 25
Orlando, Florida – 26
Nashville, Tennessee – 26
Columbus, Ohio – 27
Tulsa, Oklahoma – 28
Phoenix, Arizona – 29
Kansas City, Missouri – 29
Atlanta, Georgia – 30
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania – 30
Charlotte, North Carolina – 30
Henderson, Nevada – 31
Irvine, California – 31
Cleveland, Ohio – 31
Albuquerque, New Mexico – 32
San Diego, California – 32
Baltimore, Maryland – 33
San Jose, California – 33
Boston, Massachusetts – 34
Austin, Texas – 34
Sacramento, California – 34
Omaha, Nebraska – 36
Aurora, Colorado – 37
Tucson, Arizona – 39
Colorado Springs, Colorado – 40
San Juan, Puerto Rico – 41
Detroit, Michigan – 43
Long Beach, California – 43
Oakland, California – 45
Washington, District of Columbia – 46
Denver, Colorado – 46
Milwaukee, Wisconsin – 46
New York, New York – 56
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania – 58
Portland, Oregon – 59
St. Paul, Minnesota – 61
San Francisco, California – 64
Seattle, Washington – 65
Minneapolis, Minnesota – 71
by brandenharvey
3 Comments
Minneapolitan here to say yay but also biking here is still not great (we have some excellent infrastructure and a lot that leaves much to be desired) so I’m hoping our low global ranking will motivate people to keep investing in better bike lanes lol
I’m surprised Seattle beat out SF, I’ve lived in both and net net I think SF is much better
It’s interesting how different Cambridge, MA is ranked from Boston.