Do you think people will look at today’s bikes in 33 years and think…..man that is beautiful carbon, I wanna go for a ride. Steel will Always be in style and glad it is making a comeback.
Do you think people will look at today’s bikes in 33 years and think…..man that is beautiful carbon, I wanna go for a ride. Steel will Always be in style and glad it is making a comeback.
Carbon bores me. It’s like it has no soul or something. I can’t put my finger on it.
bikesnkitties on
r/bicyclingcirclejerk
Eightiesmed on
That bike looks nice, but I prefer a bike that is actually nice to ride. No indexed gears on this one and I do a lot of riding in wet/snowy conditions, so those brakes wouldn’t do much. That’s a work of art, but I want a tool that lets me ride.
yufan52 on
Titanium frames also have a soul.
Fr00tman on
Climbing on my steel late ‘70s-early ‘80s road bike always bugged me, I could see the flex. I love how my carbon bike climbs. It also is comfortable on gravel. But I also think the return of vinyl is kinda amusing, as I jumped at the ability to have better dynamic range and no deterioration every time I played a record. I do appreciate the fact that when I put an old record on, I know exactly where in each song the big pops are, but there is something to be said for improving things (when it actually improves them, not just reduces costs or tries to manipulate things in order to sell more – like mastering CDs too hot in the ‘90s).
Critical-Border-6845 on
Yeah there will always be people who look at the past through rose coloured nostalgia lenses and think things used to be so much better.
There’s really no reason why tubes made from an alloy of iron and carbon are more special or have more “soul” than a layup made of resin and carbon fiber.
mankiw on
>Do you think people will look at today’s bikes in 33 years and think…..man that is beautiful carbon, I wanna go for a ride
probably, sure
Secret_Squirrel100 on
Yes I do think that people will say that.
PobBrobert on
Saying that steel is “making a comeback” shows you haven’t been paying attention to the bike industry.
Plenty of companies have been making steel bikes in a broad spectrum of prices for every application outside of lightweight, racing-specific bikes where weight savings is key.
Trek, Cannondale, Giant and Specialized (RIP the Langster, the last steel bike from a big 4 I’m aware of), might not make steel bikes anymore, but there are tons of options from other brands, and have been for the last 30 years.
chockobumlick on
It’ll be brand driven. IMO
I have a colnago c40, and c50.
Both are more beautiful than the new colnagos. I think they’ll be loved as much as now
negativeyoda on
Survivorship bias.
There are cool modern bikes that will become classics and there’s crap from back in the day that’s largely forgotten. Any of us can find some classic stinkers where we’d wonder what the designers were smoking.
Spare_Blacksmith_816 on
looks nice, I have two steel Surly bikes and they look like crap 24/7 because they are not clear coated.
I have a carbon fiber Bianchi in celeste that looks awesome.
I wouldn’t get too hung up or hopeful about anything 30+ years into the future.
I think a lot of it has to do with many older bikes having a unique look. If that bike was in basic black, I don’t think mostg people would find it interesting.
A lot of bikes made now don’t really put any character into their pain scheme. It’s just a single color with the manufacturer’s name printed on it. Sometimes they have better colour schemes, but they are usually reserved for the top end models.
YoSupWeirdos on
me on my tube alu bike with an old ass 3×9 ultegra looking at steel vs carbon like
Dheorl on
I look at old carbon bikes and think they’re beautiful; I don’t see why I wouldn’t think the same with current carbon bikes in the future?
akanefive on
It’s ok to say you like something without tearing down things that other people like.
Alekz_k on
What a beauty! Kudos for keeping it in this condition.
Here is pic of my 1990 Bridgestone Radac in not so great shape, needs new paint.
Carbon is bland looking and too fragile for me, but who knows in 30 years from now, maybe something even more fragile and people will miss it, same as steel!
FixFix75 on
There are a few steel bikes that I absolutely love, but mainly because those were my dream bikes a some 35 years ago and they stuck with me. I wouldn’t mind to own one or two of those. But I also doubt i’ll be riding them much. There’s no way they will be as comfortable as my carbon allroad bike that quite possibly has a frame that is as well built as those, accepts 38mm tyres and shows a good amount of seatpost which increases the comfort much more than those bikes possibly could.
A modern steel bike I would definitely consider. Before buying my latest bike I was actually seriously considering either a steel or Ti Stelbel.
19 Comments
Carbon bores me. It’s like it has no soul or something. I can’t put my finger on it.
r/bicyclingcirclejerk
That bike looks nice, but I prefer a bike that is actually nice to ride. No indexed gears on this one and I do a lot of riding in wet/snowy conditions, so those brakes wouldn’t do much. That’s a work of art, but I want a tool that lets me ride.
Titanium frames also have a soul.
Climbing on my steel late ‘70s-early ‘80s road bike always bugged me, I could see the flex. I love how my carbon bike climbs. It also is comfortable on gravel. But I also think the return of vinyl is kinda amusing, as I jumped at the ability to have better dynamic range and no deterioration every time I played a record. I do appreciate the fact that when I put an old record on, I know exactly where in each song the big pops are, but there is something to be said for improving things (when it actually improves them, not just reduces costs or tries to manipulate things in order to sell more – like mastering CDs too hot in the ‘90s).
Yeah there will always be people who look at the past through rose coloured nostalgia lenses and think things used to be so much better.
There’s really no reason why tubes made from an alloy of iron and carbon are more special or have more “soul” than a layup made of resin and carbon fiber.
>Do you think people will look at today’s bikes in 33 years and think…..man that is beautiful carbon, I wanna go for a ride
probably, sure
Yes I do think that people will say that.
Saying that steel is “making a comeback” shows you haven’t been paying attention to the bike industry.
Plenty of companies have been making steel bikes in a broad spectrum of prices for every application outside of lightweight, racing-specific bikes where weight savings is key.
Trek, Cannondale, Giant and Specialized (RIP the Langster, the last steel bike from a big 4 I’m aware of), might not make steel bikes anymore, but there are tons of options from other brands, and have been for the last 30 years.
It’ll be brand driven. IMO
I have a colnago c40, and c50.
Both are more beautiful than the new colnagos. I think they’ll be loved as much as now
Survivorship bias.
There are cool modern bikes that will become classics and there’s crap from back in the day that’s largely forgotten. Any of us can find some classic stinkers where we’d wonder what the designers were smoking.
looks nice, I have two steel Surly bikes and they look like crap 24/7 because they are not clear coated.
I have a carbon fiber Bianchi in celeste that looks awesome.
I wouldn’t get too hung up or hopeful about anything 30+ years into the future.
just ride.
https://preview.redd.it/r6t9to6f4f3d1.jpeg?width=794&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9eafb6891a0c06e2899aadf0182918b0bf320399
This is what I think of when I look at that bike.
I think a lot of it has to do with many older bikes having a unique look. If that bike was in basic black, I don’t think mostg people would find it interesting.
A lot of bikes made now don’t really put any character into their pain scheme. It’s just a single color with the manufacturer’s name printed on it. Sometimes they have better colour schemes, but they are usually reserved for the top end models.
me on my tube alu bike with an old ass 3×9 ultegra looking at steel vs carbon like
I look at old carbon bikes and think they’re beautiful; I don’t see why I wouldn’t think the same with current carbon bikes in the future?
It’s ok to say you like something without tearing down things that other people like.
What a beauty! Kudos for keeping it in this condition.
Here is pic of my 1990 Bridgestone Radac in not so great shape, needs new paint.
https://preview.redd.it/qlz29w4q5f3d1.jpeg?width=4608&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=405a8d5868f3208919f15ee878f70c3e5cba6269
Carbon is bland looking and too fragile for me, but who knows in 30 years from now, maybe something even more fragile and people will miss it, same as steel!
There are a few steel bikes that I absolutely love, but mainly because those were my dream bikes a some 35 years ago and they stuck with me. I wouldn’t mind to own one or two of those. But I also doubt i’ll be riding them much. There’s no way they will be as comfortable as my carbon allroad bike that quite possibly has a frame that is as well built as those, accepts 38mm tyres and shows a good amount of seatpost which increases the comfort much more than those bikes possibly could.
A modern steel bike I would definitely consider. Before buying my latest bike I was actually seriously considering either a steel or Ti Stelbel.