I’m currently riding a 2004 Kona Jake the Snake, which I’ve now owned for 19 years. Was used as a loaded touring bike back in the day, now it sees action as a mixed use pavement/gravel/dirt bike when I’m not on my trail bike.
Many parts have been changed over the years, including the wheels and a Ritchey carbon CX fork. It has 32c Clement MSO x’plor tires on it.
I’m interested in riding more gravel/mixed surfaces, especially during the shoulder seasons when mtb trails can be sloppy in southern Ontario. I’ll probably also start throwing the Paris to Ancaster race into the mix, this year will be my first go at it. Not trying to be competitive, just get out there and do it up! I’d also consider doing some bikepacking again at some point.
So now the question: if I upgrade to a modern bike, will I notice a significant positive difference? The Kona, while stiff and responsive, can be pretty jarring on rougher surfaces, and I’m likely limited to a 35c tire on the current 17mm rims. If I made a change I don’t think I want an aluminum bike again, as that just seems like the same thing over again. But correct me if I’m wrong, maybe aluminum has come a long way in 20 years.
I’d happily trade off some snap for some compliance I think. Locally I’ve looked at the steel Jamis Renegade S2, and the Cannondale Topstone Carbon 4. I have not ridden either yet, but really liked the look of both of them.
Is the geometry on these bikes different in a much improved way? I’d rather be a little more upright vs an aggressive race position. I spend very little time in the bottom of the drop bars.
Any insight that can be provided is welcome, thanks!
by WellDoneBevinKacon
6 Comments
Titanium chain
Depending on local conditions, fenders. They are a game changer for reducing how filthy both you and your drivetrain can get.
Hydraulic disc brakes and wider tires is what you’re „missing“. aluminum has come a long way in my opinion. My fairly modern allroad bike rides way smoother than the 2004ish road bike of my buddy. That might be due to the wide tires though. However I like the comfortable geometry of an endurance/all road bike, paired with 40mm tires. Hydraulic brakes need no further introduction. They are just an improvement over anything rim related I ever rode. That being said, if you enjoy your bike, ride the shit out of it. If you have the money and want a new bike, buy one. Can’t really go wrong with either option
Main advantage I’d say is bigger tire clearance. Bigger tires usually give better traction, also more float/shock absorption, so you can have a stiff frame but not feel all the harshness.
Do some test rides on modern geo bikes and see what you think. A 650B gravel bike like the Kona Rove, if it fits your body, will give you a comfortable more upright position and the wide, supple tires will be very compliant. Watch some bike reviews on the YouTube channel ThePathLessPedaled for tons of info on these types of bikes (he reviewed the Rove a few years back). He discusses frame material, supple tires and everything you need to know about gravel riding besides racing.
Your pump