Britain is lagging 200 years behind the Dutch in terms of cycling facilities and investment

SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel for more videos: http://www.youtube.com/skynews

Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/skynews and https://twitter.com/skynewsbreak

Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/skynews

For more content go to http://news.sky.com and download our apps:

iPad https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/Sky-News-for-iPad/id422583124

iPhone https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/sky-news/id316391924?mt=8

Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bskyb.skynews.android&hl=en_GB

Idiot ensuring that uh cycling is safe is your priority number one if you cannot cycle safe then people that uh started as Avid cyclists will stop and you will not have growth

Share.

8 Comments

  1. I'm not saying the overall message of the video is false, clearly it is not, but why would they compare the per capita spending on cycling for a whole country with the spending on it in another country excluding the capital city? Why not cite the number spent per capita on cycling in ALL of the U.K., including London? Probably wouldn't radically different, but why compare tangerines and oranges when comparing oranges and oranges is more apt?

  2. Why does this video just limits itself to Amsterdam. The Netherlands is small but not that small to consist only only out of one city, Amsterdam.
    For cycling being safe the city faces other challenges as the countryside. For all those different challenges solutions have been created, an ongoing process.

Leave A Reply