Or you could just stay away from Kentucky all together.
Puzzleheaded_Truck80 on
Purge level stuff or nearly any dystopian sci fi. Made (potentially real) ironically they call themselves the pro-life party.
allegate on
Hopefully the governor will veto it.
Nu11us on
Fascinating that it’s based on the product of a libertarian think tank. Land ownership itself doesn’t seem particularly libertarian, and certainly taking someone’s right to life justified by legalese over inalienable rights isn’t.
jonobr on
Tour in a country with right to roam laws, much much better.
RemoteDangerous7439 on
Come to Scandinavia instead and enjoy some allemansrätten, bro.
frontfight on
Such a great country where humanity is valued.
samplenajar on
Jesus, a real life EZ rider moment
johnmflores on
Church on Sunday. Kill the homeless on Monday.
NegaScraps on
The US, where capital in all forms is more important than human life. That it is being modified instead of tacitly understood is terrifying.
BoyWonderDownUnder2 on
1) This bill has nothing whatsoever to do with recreational camping.
2) This bill hasn’t even been voted on so no, Kentucky hasn’t “legalized killing campers”.
Get your clickbait bullshit out of here.
abbys11 on
No where else I can think of has this mentality of you vs tue world like the US.
You can’t build society on pure mistrust and hatred
monoatomic on
Crazy legislation, and doubtless a response to people getting in trouble for eg soaking unhoused people in ice water in the dead of winter.
What’s more, if the law really makes deadly force justifiable based on the ‘belief’ that someone was trying to commit robbery or other crimes or even someone defying a contested eviction, there are some pretty wild implications for self defense.
If someone is on a hike and ends up on private property, this law could mean that the property owner could shoot at the hiker, and the hiker could shoot back, and it’s possible that neither of them would be breaking the law.
Ambitious-Eye-2881 on
Hope Rockin Ron (Free State of Florida) doesn’t get any ideas.
14 Comments
Or you could just stay away from Kentucky all together.
Purge level stuff or nearly any dystopian sci fi. Made (potentially real) ironically they call themselves the pro-life party.
Hopefully the governor will veto it.
Fascinating that it’s based on the product of a libertarian think tank. Land ownership itself doesn’t seem particularly libertarian, and certainly taking someone’s right to life justified by legalese over inalienable rights isn’t.
Tour in a country with right to roam laws, much much better.
Come to Scandinavia instead and enjoy some allemansrätten, bro.
Such a great country where humanity is valued.
Jesus, a real life EZ rider moment
Church on Sunday. Kill the homeless on Monday.
The US, where capital in all forms is more important than human life. That it is being modified instead of tacitly understood is terrifying.
1) This bill has nothing whatsoever to do with recreational camping.
2) This bill hasn’t even been voted on so no, Kentucky hasn’t “legalized killing campers”.
Get your clickbait bullshit out of here.
No where else I can think of has this mentality of you vs tue world like the US.
You can’t build society on pure mistrust and hatred
Crazy legislation, and doubtless a response to people getting in trouble for eg soaking unhoused people in ice water in the dead of winter.
What’s more, if the law really makes deadly force justifiable based on the ‘belief’ that someone was trying to commit robbery or other crimes or even someone defying a contested eviction, there are some pretty wild implications for self defense.
If someone is on a hike and ends up on private property, this law could mean that the property owner could shoot at the hiker, and the hiker could shoot back, and it’s possible that neither of them would be breaking the law.
Hope Rockin Ron (Free State of Florida) doesn’t get any ideas.