It sounds funny to say, but this bike lane was a big influence on this channel. When we first moved to Montreal in 2019 we lived nearby and saw the city take Saint-Denis Street, a six lane road that we would never consider biking on, and turn it into the busiest bike corridor in the city under the concept of an “express bike network” (REV in French) that includes a few other routes right now and will include many more routes in the future. The Saint Denis express bike corridor was a big lesson in “if you build it, they will come”, and the number of cyclists has only been climbing.

Keep Urbanity rolling:

Join our Patreon for early releases, credit at the end of each video, and bonus content: https://www.patreon.com/ohtheurbanity
Subscribe on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCN5CBM1NkqDYAHgS-AbgGHA?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ohurbanity
Twitter: https://twitter.com/OhUrbanity

For professional inquiries, please send us a message on Instagram or Twitter. Note that we may not be able to respond to all messages.

References:

Montreal bike counter data: https://data.eco-counter.com/ParcPublic/?id=630
Vision vélo 2023-27: https://portail-m4s.s3.montreal.ca/pdf/carte_et_liste_des_projets_annonces_-_vision_velo_2023-2027.pdf

It sounds funny to say, but this bike lane was a big influence on this channel. When we first moved to Montreal in 2019 we lived nearby and saw the city take Saint-Denis Street, a six lane road that we would never consider biking on, and turn it into the busiest

Bike corridor in the city under the concept of an “express bike network” (REV in French) that includes a few other routes right now and will include many more routes in the future. The Saint Denis express bike corridor was a big lesson in “if you build it, they will

Come”, and the number of cyclists has only been climbing. The first year it was open, it saw 1.1 million trips. The next year, 1.3 million. In the third year, which just ended, this corridor saw 1.5 million trips, another big increase.

Breaking it down by month, here’s year 1, year 2, and finally year 3. Winter cycling isn’t quite mainstream yet, but every month is on an upward trend and January and February have the biggest volume increases over time. Winter cycling isn’t quite mainstream yet, but every season is on an upward trend and

Winter actually saw the biggest percentage jump from the first to the third year. So what explains the success of this bike corridor, and how can your city replicate it? First, the micro level: the design of the bike lane.

Everyone knows the gold standard for a bike lane is concrete protection from cars or even full separation from the road surface, but this route doesn’t actually have that. There’s concrete at intersections and underpasses but most of the route isn’t technically “protected” in the sense that cycling advocates usually ask for.

Despite that, it still feels really comfortable and obviously it’s been a big success. How can that work? One critical detail is that the bike lane is to the right of the parked cars, adjacent to the sidewalk, instead of to the left between parked cars and traffic like the standard

North American painted bike lane. A parking lane is about two and a half metres (or 8 feet) wide, and having that extra distance between you and car traffic — plus the mass of the actual parked cars — makes a huge difference without requiring pouring concrete on the road.

With that said, more protection or differentiation for the bike lane is still good, and from what we understand the long-term plan is to turn Saint-Denis into something more like these Danish-style bike lanes. Saint-Denis is also wide, closer to the width of a car lane than a standard North American painted bike lane.

Further down the route it gets even wider. Wide bike lanes make it easier to pass or to ride alongside people and talk to them while cycling, and it means that you have more room to avoid conflicts like passenger-side doors or people moving between the sidewalk and their parked cars.

Wide lanes also give a lot more breathing room to handle snowfall in the winter. Alongside the width, we have the fact that the Saint-Denis corridor is two one-way bike lanes on each side of the road, in the same direction as traffic.

Montreal used to build a lot of two-way bike lanes but now it tries to build one-way when possible, especially on busier streets. They’re more natural at intersections and do a better job of handling high volumes of cyclists. One level above the lane is the design of the route.

The Saint-Denis bike corridor is long and direct, covering 11 kilometres or 7 miles from one end of the island to the other, if we include the older bike lane down here. The distance makes it very useful, connecting lots of neighbourhoods and destinations.

Shorter corridors or connections can be useful too, but longer crosstown routes have bigger potential to be game changers. Think of it like subways or even highways. The most important and useful ones cover lots of distance and connect lots of things.

We’d probably even say that one 10 kilometre bike corridor is better than five separate two-kilometre routes, at least for a city this size. The Saint-Denis bike corridor is also on a main street that goes through the middle of lots of different neighbourhoods, at least for most of the route.

That compares to another approach of putting bike routes on side streets, which is definitely better than no bike route at all, but they become a bit less useful and much less visible like that. Maybe worst of all, side street bike routes are often indirect with lots of twists and turns.

The simplicity of going straight down the middle of lots of different neighbourhoods is really hard to beat. The next level above the route is the network. Bike lanes don’t succeed on their own any more than subways or highways do. Imagine if you had subway lines or highways that didn’t connect to anything.

Transportation works when it’s a network. In this case, the success of Saint-Denis relies on the fact that it connects to about a dozen other different bike routes and acts as a spine for the whole system. Some of the connecting lanes are older corridors with older designs but others are newer ones

Designed with the same principles as Saint-Denis, like wide lanes and direct routes. One good example is Bellechasse Street, transformed a few years ago from a not-so-great standard North American painted bike route — with narrow painted lanes between parked cars and

Traffic — to much wider bike lanes with one lane of parking and one lane of traffic. This is still a “painted bike lane” but it’s now a much better painted bike lane with more room for cyclists and fewer cars to worry about.

Bellechasse recorded about 900,000 cyclists last year at this spot and 450,000 here, and the successes of Saint-Denis rely on good routes like this feeding into it as a central corridor on the network. Here’s Vision vélo, the city’s plan for bike lane expansion between 2023 and 2027.

Grey is existing routes, green is new protected bike lanes, and red is the plan for new REV or express bike corridors that are planned to be built under the same principles as Saint-Denis. On top of filling in a few gaps, there are also three long and direct routes on Jean-Talon

Street, Lacordaire Boulevard, and Henri-Bourassa Boulevard that feel like they could be game changers too, opening up lots of new currently underserved neighbourhoods and, of course, linking up with the Saint-Denis REV. On top of the design of the lane itself, the route, and the network, the urban environment

Of the city has to play a role in the success of the route. Montreal has a lot of medium-density housing, which means that a lot of people live close to this corridor or a nearby bike route. That’s just going to give higher cycling volumes than if these neighbourhoods were

Full of single-family homes because there are just more people with places to go. The higher densities also mean that there isn’t enough room for everyone to own a car, and that has to help cycling volumes too. One final detail is that there are a lot of bike share stations near this corridor, including

In the summer but especially in the winter as Montreal does a pilot for year-round bike share that basically focuses on the Saint-Denis corridor. One of the most interesting comments we get is when cycling critics tell us something along the lines of “well, my city built bike lanes but hardly anyone uses them!”.

If they tell you where it is you can usually identify the problems pretty quickly, like narrow painted lanes on high-speed roads that don’t connect to much. Of course cyclists aren’t going to be out there in droves. But it’s always interesting how people who never bike themselves often have no awareness

Of what makes a bike route useful or popular. Here’s the formula based on the most popular route in our city. First, full protection or separation is ideal but if that’s not possible, you can still get a pretty good experience by making the bike lane wide, putting it on the side of

Parked cars away from traffic, and making one-way lanes on each side of the street. Second, make the route long, straight, and central through the middle of neighbourhoods so it connects to useful destinations in a way that’s easy to understand and navigate.

Third, connect to other useful bike routes too so that it can take advantage of powerful network effects. Fourth, allow dense housing development around the corridor without mandating a ton of parking so that lots of people can live nearby without necessarily owning a car.

And fifth, if possible, provide a useful and affordable bike share system with stations nearby. Thanks for watching through to the end of the video. Don’t forget to bike and subscribe, and a special thanks to our supporters on Patreon. Cheers to a happy and healthy 2024.

Share.

49 Comments

  1. #3 is so true, but in Utrecht, yes, in the Netherlands, lot's of bikelines are turned into 2-way. City says: A) One route to maintain B) half of the bikes does not need to cross the road. But: most cardrivers are still not used to see a bike coming from the right. Compliments on the system in Montreal!

  2. Great way to summarize the success factors, we should all be forwarding this to our local city planners (if they're not already following this fantastic channel).

  3. Bikeshare programs are a system with limited returns, so I am not sure I would include #8 on your list. The issue with bikeshare is that all the bikes people use clutter up certain spots and need to be taken back to other places where they can be picked up. The bigger this program grows, the more 'bike relocation trucks' you'll have driving around your city, and the more common it becomes for people to come across a place with no bikes. As such, bikeshares are a good thing to kick things off, but once you've got success, you'll actually want to remove them as all the time, space and money spent on keeping the system operational is counter-productive.

  4. Very nice video, any plans on covering the impact of the 3 year pilot project in Quebec that allows ebikes, escooters, e-unicycles and other micro-transport on roads and bike lanes?

  5. There's just one major barrier to building bike lanes: any attempt to remove car parking spaces or car lanes will inevitably be met with cries of "WAR ON CARS!!" from angry car-addicted suburbanites, most infamously the evil John Phillips of 790 KABC. You should hold a debate against him!

  6. As long as bike-jacking criminals are not allowed to go free like they are in liberal American cities, it would be worthwhile. I ride in Boston/Cambridge, and its OK, but not optimal. The streets are narrow and traffic lights are horribly timed. Add to this cyclists who travel the wrong way down one-way lanes, while on cell phones, and it's a real disaster.

  7. Path width is more important than having some concrete median (which taks space from bike lane and reduces its width.
    St Lazarre puts plastic posts along its St Angélique main street wich makes the bike ane effectively too narrow to use so forced to ride in middle or road since you can't ride on side without hitting those plastic posts.
    More importantly, the politicians needs to stop treating cycling as a recreational thing and treat it as transport, and this impacts the design to make it fast to go from A to B instead of creating nice looking but inefficient routes with unnecessary curves and barriers (such as concrete border that cause a big bump at each intersection).

  8. Paint only can ironically, provide more protection than concrete curbs. The reason is that with paint only, there will be a space for a car to be parked. Using the parked car as a protection barrier fills the need to provide both parking and protection and the car passengers still have some room to open the door. I've ridden this route several times and the speed is excellent. On a typical trip, you can expect to have one or two passengers come out the right side door. Having the lane to the right also makes turns easier.

  9. This looks great, but at 1:28 it shows how cars have to look behind them to cross the bike lane. I've seen that the Netherlands try to make all intersections with pedestrians or cyclists for cars in front of the car, not to the side. There is some room for improvement there. I was in Montréal last week and was amazed at how good the city is, and loved seeing the bike lanes. We stayed on Saint Denis and loved it (right by the Dickies store). What a great city.

  10. it's not bad cycling in winter. just need to wrap up properly and get decent tires. i don't think we need to salt roads or even clear the snow- just pack the snow down to give a flat surface will be fine for winter cycling on good tires.

  11. Important to make the bike lane visually distinct from both the parking bays and the footpath. Otherwise, motorists WILL park in it and pedestrians WILL walk in it. Painted bike symbols every 100m isn’t enough it would seem.

  12. The space between the Blue and white lines.. That's the average -bike- size space for road cycling in NA.
    Ok JELLY who gets Door swing safty space????

  13. I used to be one of those crazy ppl who would bike down St. Denis before the bike lanes.. in the winter. It was one of the best streets for biking north-south in the winter tho, because it was so regularly cleared of snow compared to the smaller streets. I love the improvements, but my only complaint is that now it's so busy with bikes that it can get crowded with slower cyclist. Ah well, I guess that just means they need to invest in even MORE bike infrastructure, [s] what a shame [/s].

  14. Wow who wouldve known that real life isnt some absurd reality where everyone "needs" to be stuck to their car like those fatasses from wall-e. Build a decent bike network, upkeep it, and theyll come.

  15. The parking separated lanes can be done poorly, if they don't have enough buffer space for passenger side doors or adequate daylighting at intersections. If they're just squeezed in to minimize the impact on space available for cars (like a traffic side lane in the door zone also is), they can give a false sense of safety for less experienced cyclists, and even increase the danger for anyone moving faster because they're less visible to drivers behind the parked cars.

    I had too many close calls with being right-hooked on the Richards Street lane in Vancouver before it was redone. The narrow bike lane also resulted in people walking between the parked cars and sidewalks without looking for oncoming bikes first – the width of the REV looks like it would better cue people to check first before stepping in to the lane.

  16. I agree that this is one of the best additions to the Montreal bike system.

    However in the warmer weather St Denis is pedestrian only from Ontario St to St Catherine. Cyclist are supposed to dismount.

    Unfortunately very few of them do that and most don't even slow down despite very clear signage.

    It's only a few blocks and there are alternative routes.

    This reflects poorly on all cyclists.

  17. For a real link East-West in Montreal,the city needs to build a REV on Sherbrooke street ( or the route 138) starting at Le Gardeur Bridge (where there is already a cycling lane) all the way to Victoria Street since at some point in the west island Sherbrooke changes name.

  18. #4 and #5 cannot be understated. Hard to say if convenience is more important than safety, but you definitely need both. If a bike lane/route is one or the other, you're not going to move the needle on modeshare.

  19. it's also critical to actually maintain bike lanes – getting rid of potholes and cleaning trash. What I also noticed while living in motnreal was that it felt safer (for a big city) to out and walk around. If it's safe to walk around, then it's safe to bike around. Finally, it's important for drivers to realize that it's not gonna be convenient to drive around in a town that's designed for pedestrians and cyclists.

  20. What do you think of driving on roads together with cars? My city (tel aviv) has a very good and robust system of bike lanes, but I sometimes find myself biking on the road between cars especially on main streets, just because it's very fast, and given the way Street lights and turns work they will probably always be a few seconds faster, at least when the car road is in the middle of the street rather than on the side. I'm sure it's a bit more dangerous than biking on a bike lane, but I find it comfortable and also it has the benefit of making cars far slower on main roads, especially in commercial roads which cars have no business being in. Maybe cities should just give all roads inside a city a 30km speed limit and let cyclists on them, what do you think?

  21. lmfao cyclists….you show Halifax bike lanes on main st in Dartmouth to justify your arguement. Why not show the million dollar bike lanes on the peninsula where < 10 people use them! What a sham!

  22. I love your channel, particularly the way you break down complex topics in a way that is easy to understand without losing key details or nuance. But to be honest, there are already a million videos that describe best-practice bike lane design. I feel like a lot of advocates might know what they want to see, but struggle with municipalities, counties, provinces etc. that are unwilling to build it. Maybe you guys could do a video showing how Montreal got to a place politically where building bike lanes like this is possible?

  23. Fantastic video. A related thing to having the bike corridor stay on main streets is that if bike lanes are on side streets, it causes big problems at junctions with larger streets, particularly if there's no traffic light at those streets (meaning you're trying to cross the larger street but you have to wait forever for a gap in traffic, since there's no traffic light). Also, obviously it takes a bit more infrastructure than the more basic elements mentioned in the video, but I love that the REV has separate signals for bikes. So important to get them into the intersection (and thus visible) before drivers attempting a right-hand turn get the green, so everybody can get through the intersection safely.

  24. Using the (parked) cars to protect the bikes from the (moving) cars is rarely a good solution. First, because a lot of cyclists were killed by a car door from a parked car, and that's a very important reason: you should NEVER park the cars right next to a bike lane. Also, if the lane's not protected, it can really soon become some additional parking space for unrespectful drivers (that's what's been happening in Paris, for instance. Cars eating up a good portion of the lane, or its entirety)

    Also I don't think a single straight lane, as long as it is, can have a big impact, if it doesn't go on the adjacent streets. You take your bike when it can bring you from start to finish efficiently, not if you have to leave it some streets behind because "THE lane" only goes so far. Wherever there's a street, there should be a bike lane, period.

    Oh and, where are you supposed to park all those bikes? If it is to become a thing, there's a huge lack in bike parkings overall. Even right around the lane. You'd think those things would go hand in hand…

    That's poor urban design for cyclists right there, and it's only considered good because there's not much better in North America tbh.

  25. This is one of the things Vancouver needs: a good east west dedicated bike corridor. We just have lots and lots of twisting bike routes on side streets, but zero direct routes that actually go to all the way from East to West/vice versa anywhere near the middle of the city.

  26. Here in New Orleans the city has been building a bicycle network but it's just totally pathetic compared to Montreal. There are only 3 decent bike corridors: Lafitte Greenway, Norman C Francis Pkwy, and Saint Anthony Street in the outer Gentilly.

  27. This video touched on many best practices that many North American cities seem to miss. Creating long direct corridors through many neighborhoods and connecting many destinations makes a big difference. Implementing the changes quickly might also be an important indicator of success. Seeing different classes of bike lanes (ie. painted, protected, separated) is very inspiring. Supportive infrastructure like bike racks and bikeshare only makes the system better. In Dallas, I hope our bike culture continues to improve. Consistent density and destinations seem to be missing here but we can do much better.

  28. Go figure, make a bike lane clearly safer than riding on the street and provide direct connections to places people want to go and it becomes a success! In most of North America I'd say that traffic filters and short-cuts stitching together calm side streets is the cheapest way to do this, but I won't say no to protected bike lanes. Madison Wisconsin between the lakes lucked into this development pattern.

  29. I hate that American cities are now becoming better for cyclists then any other European city, excluding Netherlands and Denmark. It's still terrible to ride your bike in Europe I feel

Leave A Reply