I decided to bite the bullet earlier this year and buy a Mountain bike. I went with the Giant Talon 0. Its a great bike don't get me wrong, but it is a budget, entry level hardtail.
After not owning a bike for over 20 years, I had no idea how much I would take to it. My fitness levels are alot higher than I expected them to be and the routes im tackling have become more and more challenging.
I spend a lot of time up on the Penine Bridle way, which is notoriously steep and rocky in parts. This means for every steep, rocky climb, there's an equally steep and rocky decent.
I cover all kinds of terrain on my rides. Small road sections, gravel paths, dirt paths, grass, rocks and roots. I see my rides as adventure and exploration. I'm not constantly trying to set PBs on strava. That being said, I want to feel capable everywhere!
This has steered me into downcountry territory, I want to balance efficiency with capability when things get rough.
Two bikes I have been considering are the Trek Procaliber 9.6 gen 3 and the Orbea Oiz H10. They're both currently on sale at a very similar price. The Trek is £2000 and the Orbea is £2099.
At this price point do I spend the money on a carbon frame hardtail like the Trek, or do I spend that money on some rear suspension? What makes the biggest difference to you more experienced riders?
Im also open to other options if anybody can offer a better alternative for me.
by dev1Zed