¿Por qué el Vaticano rechaza ahora siglos de fe mariana?

¿Por qué el Vaticano rechaza ahora siglos de fe mariana?
Defendemos el papel sublime que Dios dio a la Santísima Virgen María: Corredentora, Mediadora y Abogada de los hombres. El documento Mater Populi Fidelis desaconseja estos títulos, pero la Biblia, la Tradición, los santos y las apariciones confirman que María no es símbolo, sino Mujer asociada al Redentor y nueva Eva que coopera en la salvación. Defenderla no es devoción: es deber de fe.

#biblia #dios #virgenmaria #fecatólica #iglesiacatolica #vidaeterna #garabandal

Si tu gustó el vídeo, haz like, deja tu comentario y suscríbete al CANAL para acceder fácilmente a los próximos vídeos que iremos subiendo cada semana. Activa las notificaciones 🛎️🔔😃 ¡Te esperamos! Que Dios te bendiga.
¿Por qué el Vaticano rechaza ahora siglos de fe mariana?

Dear friends who are joining us on YouTube, welcome to your channel, Messengers of the Virgin of Garabandal. This Catholic space is a place to deepen our faith, strengthen our souls, and seek the truth with love for the Church, the Virgin Mary, and her Divine Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, always striving to discern the shadows of deception and confusion that beset us in these dark times of tribulation. Today we address a delicate, timely, and transcendental topic: the recent Vatican document entitled “Mater Populi Fidelis,” published by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, concerning the figure of the Blessed Virgin Mary. This text has caused surprise and unease in many hearts because, although it acknowledges Mary’s maternal and intercessory role to some extent, it discourages the use of the title “co-redemptrix,” deeming it theologically inadequate and pastorally inappropriate. It also reduces the titles “mediatrix” and “advocate” to a purely devotional or symbolic level , avoiding presenting them as genuine cooperation in the work of redemption or in the distribution of grace. This has prompted a profound and sincere question among the faithful: How can something that has been upheld for centuries by saints, doctors of the Church, Church Fathers, and popes, and that forms part of the Census Fidei of the Christian people, be considered inappropriate or confusing today? If we strip Mary of her co-redemptive role, aren’t we reducing her to a mere holy woman, deprived of the unique mission that God himself entrusted to her? Because if She does not truly intercede, how do we understand Her living presence in the apparitions of Lourdes, Fatima, Guadalupe, Garabandal, Akita, or even in the first apparition in Zaragoza, when she was still alive and came to strengthen the Apostle James? And how do we explain the exorcisms where demons tremble at the sound of Her name and flee in Her presence? Brothers and sisters, all of this is not by chance. Mary Most Holy is not a decorative figure, but a woman associated with the Redeemer. She is the new Eve. She is the spiritual Mother of humanity and the co-redemptrix of all graces, as tradition has called her, because that is what the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit willed. And to help us clarify this document and defend the Blessed Mother, her dogmas, glories, and prerogatives, we are joined today, as always, by our dear friend and trusted expert, Mauricio Ozaeta, as you know, a great scholar and researcher of the Bible and Eschatology. So Mauricio, welcome back to your channel and thank you for joining us on this important program to analyze this step taken by the Vatican against the fundamental role of the Virgin Mary. Hello, Miguel Leopoldo, a big hello to you and to everyone who follows your channel, Messengers of the Virgin of Garabandal. I am very grateful for this invitation to defend our Mother, the Blessed Virgin, and also to defend the truth. There is a phrase I have repeated for many years: to separate oneself from the truth is to separate oneself from Christ, and to separate oneself from Christ is to lose everything. So, it is not only about defending the Blessed Virgin, her dogmas, her prerogatives, her glories, but also about defending the truth, because the truth is Christ. Therefore, defending the truth is defending God, the rights of God, and it is attaining eternal life, because separating oneself from the truth is going towards hell, and embracing the truth, pursuing the truth, and defending the truth is going towards eternal salvation. Indeed, as He said, “I am the truth and the life.” In other words, it couldn’t be clearer. So we’re in your hands, Mauricio. Enlighten us on this important and transcendental topic. Please let me know, Miguel Leopoldo, when the screen sharing is available. Perfect, it’s working. Mary Queen Co-Redemptrix. I thank God for the opportunity to present this biblical and prophetic study entitled Mary Queen Co-Redemptrix. Topics: What is the fifth Marian dogma? When will it occur? What will its effects or consequences be? Why is this last Marian dogma so attacked? What have popes and saints of the Catholic Church said about Mary as Co-Redemptrix? Where is this prophesied in the Holy Scriptures? Approvals from Our Lady of All Nations in Amsterdam confirm that it is approved , and it was there that She prophesied that it will be proclaimed on May 31st. Heavenly confirmations regarding this Marian apparition, the one in Amsterdam, and we conclude with the relationship between the Miraculous Medal and the fifth Marian dogma. A brief summary of this Amsterdam apparition. It is quite long, rather long; it can’t be read in a short time because there are Marian apparitions with little text, little content. Amsterdam is quite long, but here I wanted to summarize the message of Amsterdam. She comes to announce the Second Pentecost; she comes to announce a grave warning of tremendous forces threatening the world and terrible events. Excuse me, the most terrible of all is the general loss of faith. That is, the greatest devastation, the greatest thing we have to fear is not physical devastation, but spiritual devastation, because that is what leads to eternal damnation. And she also announces that the fifth Marian dogma will be proclaimed. And here I read a small fragment of a message. This dogma will be, and is, the glorious coronation of His Mother. And when it is proclaimed, the Lady of All Nations will obtain peace. Peace for the whole world. The Holy Spirit of peace is now closer than ever, but He will only come if you pray. So, this Second Pentecost is foretold in the Bible, it’s in Joel chapter 3, although in the Straubinger it appears at the end of chapter 2. It says, “And after that, I will pour out my Spirit on all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy, your old men will dream dreams, your young men will see visions. Even on my servants, both men and women, I will pour out my Spirit in those days, and I will perform great wonders in the heavens and on the earth.” This could perhaps also be associated with the First Pentecost, but above all, this prophecy of Joel is associated with the Second Pentecost, that is, the one that will happen now on the Day of the Warning. So, she is warning us in Amsterdam about something that is already in the Bible. The Second Pentecost is biblical, and she gave us a very important prayer that we must pray daily, which I am placing below. Why? Because with this prayer we ask for both the Second Pentecost and The proclamation of the fifth Marian dogma. I suggest everyone learn it by heart. It’s very short, very simple, and by learning it by heart, one can pray it daily, as requested by the Virgin. We must pray the Amsterdam prayer daily, I repeat, to ask for the Second Pentecost and for the proclamation of the fifth Marian dogma. It’s very interesting that the Blessed Virgin, in Father Gobbi’s Blue Book, when she speaks of the Second Pentecost, associates it with the Warning and the Illumination of Consciences. If anyone has any doubt about this association, they need only review all the messages in this book, where She speaks of what the Second Pentecost is, and She, the Blessed Virgin, associates it with the Warning and the Illumination of Consciences, like this message of May 22, 1988, entitled “The Holy Spirit Will Come.” And look at what it says below in purple: “With His divine love, He will open the doors of hearts and illuminate all consciences. Every man.” You will see yourselves in the burning fire of divine truth. It will be like a mini-judgment. The Mother teaches us that the Second Pentecost is associated with the Warning and the Illumination of Consciences. We see this, for example, in this other message from June 4, 1995, in Bacalo, Switzerland, entitled “Tongues of Fire.” There, she again predicts the Second Pentecost with tongues of fire, as occurred at the First Pentecost, and includes what is here in purple: “You will be illuminated by this divine light and you will see yourselves in the mirror of God’s truth and holiness. It will be like a mini-judgment that will open the doors of your heart to receive the great gift of Divine Mercy.” Therefore, thanks to this marvelous, beautiful book, we have no doubt whatsoever that there is a very close relationship between the Second Pentecost, the Warning, and the Illumination of Consciences. This is foretold with special emphasis in the revelation of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Amsterdam, the Lady of All the People. Since this is a very long revelation and I can’t read it all here—it takes hours to read— I’m going to read a fragment from perhaps the most important message from Amsterdam, dated May 31, 1954. It’s message number 50, and it says this. I’m only going to read what’s underlined in color because of time constraints. Anyone who wants to can pause and read it in full. The Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix, and Advocate is now before you. I have chosen this day. On this day, Our Lady will receive her Coronation. Let’s note that the message is from May 31, which contains a prophecy that it will be on May 31 that She will be crowned with this dogma of Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix, and Advocate. That is to say, it’s a prophecy, and this will be fulfilled. No matter how much resistance there is from Satan, from hell, from the evil one, and from the men who serve the devil. God’s prophecies are always fulfilled, without fail. That is to say, it will be proclaimed on May 31. We don’t know the year, but we do know the date. It continues, “On this day, the Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix, and Advocate, as Our Lady of All Nations, will receive her official title. The Holy Father will approve it, but you must help him. Understand this well.” We understand, Miguel Leopoldo, that it will be Peter the Roman who does this. He must first be a true pope; he cannot be an antipope. Furthermore, he must be a pope who loves the Virgin and believes in this truth of Mary as Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix, and Advocate. In other words, the only option we see, according to the prophecies, is that it will be proclaimed by Peter the Roman. And I continue with what it says in purple. Now it’s as if the Lady and I were suddenly on the dome of a great church. As we enter, I hear the Lady say, “I bring you here. Tell what I make you see and hear.” We are now in a very large church , in St. Peter’s Basilica. I see many cardinals and bishops gathered. Then the Pope enters, carried in on a sort of chair, but later he walks, the people applaud, the choir begins. This gives a little glimpse of what that proclamation will be like. It’s very interesting that the Amsterdam revelation is eminently visual; that is, most of the revelation is Ida Perderman narrating in her own words what the Virgin showed her in visions. Amsterdam is very visual; of course, it also includes words from the Virgin, but it is primarily visual. It’s a manifestation, let’s call it that, multimedia. And the text continues, what it says here now in green: “And the Lady remained with her apostles until the Holy Spirit came. In the same way, the Lady can come to her apostles and people throughout the world to bring them the Holy Spirit again. My prophecy, ‘ From now on all nations will call me blessed,’ will be fulfilled even more when the dogma is proclaimed. The Holy Father knows his time. He will prepare and fulfill this before he is taken to be with us.” When the dogma, the last dogma in Marian history, is proclaimed, then Our Lady of All Nations will bring peace, true peace, to the world. However, the people, together with the Church, must pray my prayer. They must know that Our Lady has come as Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix, and Advocate. It is a prophecy; the plan for this fifth dogma, which has these three parts—Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix, and Advocate—will be fulfilled . But Our Lady tells us in this message that we must pray the prayer, as I said before, praying the Amsterdam prayer daily, asking for and accelerating the proclamation of the fifth Marian dogma. What is the date, then, on which it will be proclaimed according to the Amsterdam prophecy? It will be May 31st. It is very interesting to note that three Marian feasts have been celebrated on that date. First, Mary, Mediatrix of All Graces, for almost 34 years. Then, Mary, Queen of Heaven and Earth, for 15 years. And from Paul VI until now, since 1969, we have celebrated the Feast of the Visitation of the Blessed Virgin Mary on May 31st for 56 years. Let’s see how interesting, how important the date May 31st is as a Marian feast. It was first Benedict XV who, on January 12, 1921, instituted the feast of Mary, Mediatrix of All Graces. Then it was Pius XII who, on October 11, 1954, instituted the feast of Mary, Queen of Heaven and Earth. When the liturgical reform was carried out by Paul VI, the feast of Mary, Queen of Heaven and Earth, was moved to May 8. I’m going to read what’s underlined in green. I’m taking it from the book *With Jesus*. Although Mary was conceived and born without the stain of sin, she participated wonderfully in the sufferings of her divine Son, thus becoming the co-redemptrix of humanity. So, he wasn’t the first pope to call her co-redemptrix, but he was the one who contributed the most to this mystery, the one who most insisted on Mary as the true co-redemptrix. And indeed, in the Wednesday audiences, from September 1995 to November 1997, for a period of approximately two years, he dedicated these audiences to a true Marian catechesis, where it is clear that he was preparing the world for the proclamation of the fifth Marian dogma. Of all these audiences during those two years, I have selected only two to give an idea of ​​what this holy pope taught us about Mary’s prerogatives, especially her role as co-redemptrix. The first one I selected is from January 8, 1997. I will only read what is in the red box due to time constraints. Indeed, Mary is not only an individual person, she is also the daughter of Zion, the new woman who, alongside the Redeemer, shares his passion and gives birth in the spirit to the children of God. This reality is expressed through the popular image of the seven swords that pierce Mary’s heart. By offering her son, whom she had received from God shortly before, to consecrate him to his mission of salvation, Mary also offers herself to this mission—the consent of the new woman to Christ’s redemptive work. And what it says below: Mary is united to her son’s sacrifice by the sword that will pierce her soul. I suggest that anyone who wishes pause and read it completely, but here it presents an exposition of the biblical event of the Presentation in the Temple and the prophecy given to her by the elderly Simeon, who was the last holy high priest of Israel. And how, in this prophecy of the sword piercing her soul, she is associated with the mission of co-redemptrix that she will carry out for us. The other passage I selected is from Wednesday, April 9, 1997, where it says— I will also read only what is underlined in red—that she alone was associated in this way with the redemptive sacrifice that merited the salvation of all humankind. In union with Christ and subordinate to Him, she cooperated in obtaining the grace of salvation for all humanity. The role of cooperator that the Virgin played is grounded in her divine maternal motherhood. Suffering with Him as He died on the cross, she cooperated in a completely unique way in the work of the Savior. And then what ends below. Therefore, we can confidently turn to the Blessed Virgin, imploring her help, aware of the unique mission that God entrusted to her: collaborator in the redemption, a mission she fulfilled throughout her life and particularly at the foot of the cross. Therefore, there is no doubt that Mary is co-redemptrix. Eight holy popes, true pontiffs, affirmed this, defending her as the true co-redemptrix. I will not enter here into the debate of whether Mary Jane Even was a true visionary or not. I leave that to each person’s judgment, but I was very struck by a vision that our Lord Jesus gave this woman in 1998. It was the vision of February 1, 1988. On that occasion, He showed her how the Holy Father was working on a beautiful book bound in white and gold, where he was laying the groundwork for the fifth Marian dogma, that is, Mary as co-redemptrix, advocate, and mediatrix of all graces . And then, in this vision, some men dressed in black entered the papal office at night and began to destroy everything the Pope had done in preparation for the fifth Marian dogma. This was a vision that was later explained to Mary Jane Even by Jesus , who confirmed that what the Pope was doing was preparing the groundwork for the proclamation of the fifth Marian dogma, and that those who entered at night destroyed all that work. They were priests. What pain must have been felt by what’s written here in red below, what pain must have been felt by Mary Jane Even when Jesus explained to her that those who entered to destroy all the papal work in preparation for the fifth Marian dogma were priests from the Vatican. How complicated, isn’t it? How difficult for us as Catholics to understand these internal struggles within our beloved Catholic Church, how to think that priests could enter a papal office to destroy everything John Paul II was doing for the proclamation of the fifth Marian dogma. And how do we know it refers to John Paul II? Because look what it says here in purple. I didn’t read it, but it says, “For this reason, your holy pontiff has spent almost two years speaking to you about the glories of the Blessed Virgin Mary in the Wednesday audiences. It has been in preparation for the dogma he intends to proclaim.” This confirms that the catechesis John Paul II gave us for two years was associated with preparing for the proclamation of the fifth Marian dogma. What this vision confirms, if it were true, is that John Paul II was not allowed to proclaim the fifth dogma, just as Benedict XVI was not. But, since it is a prophecy, will it come to pass? Therefore, we have complete confidence that the true future pontiff, Peter the Roman, or whose motto is Peter the Roman, will indeed make this proclamation. It is a prophecy, and it will be fulfilled, without a doubt. Now, what did the saints say about Mary as co-redemptrix? At least a dozen saints contributed to this mystery. Of all these, I selected only one, Saint Teresa of Calcutta, because of an important letter she sent to her friend Pope John Paul II. It is public; you can look it up on the internet. It is a couple of pages long, not very long, and I am going to read only a fragment where this holy woman supports with her words, in a theological way, the three parts of the fifth Marian dogma. It reads as follows: “Mary is our co-redemptrix with Jesus. She gave him her body and suffered with him at the foot of the cross. Mary is the mediatrix of all graces. She gave us Jesus and, as our mother, obtains all graces for us. Mary is our advocate who prays for Jesus. Only through the heart of Mary can we reach the Eucharistic heart of Jesus. The papal definition of Mary as co-redemptrix, mediatrix, and advocate will bring great graces to the Church, all through Jesus and through Mary. She not only sustains the three parts of the fifth Marian dome, but also gives us a prophecy, because notice how it ends; it doesn’t speak in the conditional tense, but in the certain future. That is to say, when Mary is proclaimed as co-redemptrix, mediatrix, and advocate, that proclamation will bring great graces to the Church. It will bring, it doesn’t say ‘would bring’ as if it were already happening or doubting that it will happen, no. Ours, that is, Saint Teresa of Calcutta knew the prophecy, believed in the prophecy, and is saying that when the proclamation is fulfilled…” Regarding the fifth Marian dogma, this will bring great graces; it will bring—that is to say, it is also a prophecy that this holy woman is giving us. She never doubted it; look for this letter, she wrote it, of course, originally in English. She sent it to John Paul II, and it is public and is a beautiful support not only for the three parts of the fifth Marian dogma, but also for the fulfillment of the prophecy. Well, in Father Gobi’s Blue Book, the Virgin is mentioned as Co-Redemptrix 14 times. I’m not going to mention all 14 times; it would be too long. I’m only going to mention it briefly on a few occasions. For example, in the message of April 1, 1974, she says, “In this way, I have become the true Co-Redemptrix by having freely offered my Son to the Father.” Father Gobi’s Blue Book, message of April 1, 1974. Also in the message of June 14, 1980: “Children, let yourselves be transformed by my powerful action of…” Mother, mediatrix of all graces and co-redemptrix. And the message of July 13, 1980, is very important because it is titled “The Work of Co-redemption,” where she explains in much greater detail why she is co-redemptrix. I am going to read only what is in a red box. If the cross has been her gallows, The pain of my Immaculate Heart has been like the altar upon which my Son offered to the Father the sacrifice of the new and eternal covenant. The Virgin’s role in the redemption of humankind is not secondary; it is central, on the same level as that of Jesus, because the Father so ordained : to save us through the Mother and the Son, Redeemer and Co-Redemptrix. A fragment from Maria Valtorta’s notebooks from 1947, specifically dated October 23, 1947, reads as follows: “There can no longer be a second redemption. It has already been accomplished by me, Christ. But there can be another glorious one through Mary to save a great number of souls from the infernal snares. In the devotion to Mary lies the secret of the final redemption.” How interesting that through Maria Valtorta, Jesus explains to us the role of the Blessed Virgin Mary in the final redemption. Mary’s role in the final redemption is central, principal at the level of Jesus’s, not secondary, not merely central and principal. And let us remember that Maria Valtorta was confirmed as a true visionary and as writings truly originating from heaven by the Italian mystic Father Micheline and also by the Blessed Virgin Mary in Medjugorje. For on one occasion , the Virgin recommended to two of the visionaries of Medjugorje, to learn about the Gospel , The Virgin recommended reading the writings of Maria Valtorta, which is thus fully ratified by Heaven as a true visionary in the treatise on true devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary. It is very interesting to read in paragraph 49 what it says above— I won’t read it, but what it says in summary (whoever wants to can pause and read it completely) is that Mary was hardly manifested at the first coming. She went very, very unnoticed because that was fitting. But look at what it says below in purple. But at the Second Coming of Jesus Christ, Mary must be known and made manifest by the Holy Spirit, so that through her Jesus Christ may be known, loved, and served. For the reasons that moved the Holy Spirit to conceal his spouse during her life and to manifest her only partially even after the preaching of the Gospel are no longer valid . That is to say, if it was fitting that Mary go almost unnoticed at the First Coming, at the Second Coming it is quite the opposite. Mary must be exalted so that through Through her, Jesus may be known, loved, and served. That is what is happening now. And that is why the Marian dogmas remained largely unproclaimed until the very end. And that is why, at the end of all, at the end of time, comes the fifth Marian dogma, so that she may be exalted and receive her full and definitive coronation. Let’s see where this fifth Marian dome is supported in the Bible. Well, first in Genesis 3:14-15. Because when the prophecy is given that she will crush your head while you strike her heel, God, in this, the first prophecy of the Bible, gave this leading role to the Virgin, for she is the one who will crush Satan’s head. So Mary’s role in the redemption of humankind is not secondary; it is primary, it is leading, and on the same level as Jesus’s. And in Luke 2, when it says, “A sword will pierce your own soul too, so that you may be saved.” ” that the intentions of many hearts may be revealed .” In this prophecy, as Pope John Paul II explained in his Wednesday audiences for almost two years, Mary’s role as co-redemptrix is ​​confirmed—that sword piercing her soul with pain, suffering at the same level as Jesus. In the book *Mysticism, City of God: Revelations of Jesus through Sister Mary of Jesus of Agreda*, we read that the Virgin asked the Eternal Father to suffer Jesus’ Passion at the same level. And what is interesting, what is impressive, is that God the Father accepted Mary’s request; that is, He granted her to suffer at the same level as Jesus, at the same level. In other words, the suffering of Jesus and Mary were equal in the Passion. So, Mary’s role as co-redemptrix is ​​foretold in both Genesis and Luke chapter 2. There is another way in which this was prophesied, somewhat veiled, but very interesting. Let’s analyze it quickly. At the end of the first book of the In the Book of Kings, we see how, when David was quite old, he came to Bathsheba to ask her for something, and she prostrated herself before him before making her request. Remember that in Hebrew culture, the wife of a king is not a queen. That’s why Bathsheba was never queen while she was alive, while David was alive, because the king’s wife is not a queen. In Hebrew culture, who is a queen? The king’s mother is the queen mother, but not the wife. That’s why when Bathsheba came to David, it was as a request she made to her king. Regardless of being his wife, she prostrated herself before him as her king, because she was only the king’s wife, not a queen. But beginning chapter 2 of this first book of Kings—we were at the end of chapter 1, and now we see at the beginning of chapter 2 how something different, something contrary, happens. And that is that once David died, Solomon succeeded him on the throne. And another successor of Bathsheba comes to make a request of the king, who is no longer her husband, but her son. The interesting thing we read here is that when Barnabas comes to ask something of the king, who is now his son, Solomon rises from his seat, goes to meet his mother, and prostrates himself before her. How interesting. Solomon prostrates himself before his mother. Why? Because she is queen. Because in Hebrew culture, the queen is the mother of the king, not the wife, but the mother. And he orders that a throne be placed at her right hand, and after he seats her at his right hand as queen mother, he says to her, “Now tell me what you have come to ask of me.” Then Bathsheba makes a request as queen mother. So, this is a prophecy. Yes, it is a prophecy that Mary will be seated in heaven on a throne at the right hand of Jesus Christ, because they are Jewish, Jesus and Mary are Jewish, and they have always done everything according to Jewish norms and laws. This means that it is a prophecy that Mary will be seated in heaven on a throne at the right hand of Jesus, because the queen is the queen mother. The mother of the king is the queen according to Hebrew culture. So, this event, which is historical— the first book of Kings, chapters 1 and 2—is not only a historical fact, but also a prophecy of Mary seated in heaven at the right hand of Jesus Christ. And in reality, the mystery of redemption begins from the moment Mary pronounces her fiat, when she says, “Behold, I am the servant of the Lord; let it be done to me according to your word.” She accepts not only the good that comes with being the mother of God, but also the pain that comes with being the mother of God. Because she understood that Christ, the Messiah, came to suffer, to die for humanity. So, from the moment she gives her fiat, she accepts to be associated with the work of redemption, not only with the joy of being the mother of God, but also with the pain of her son’s death and having to offer him up for the salvation of humankind . Okay, let’s talk about the Amsterdam apparitions. First, remember that according to the current document from the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, dated February 25 , 1978, only the local bishop is authorized to analyze and approve an apparition or heavenly manifestation. It is the bishop of the diocese where the supernatural or allegedly supernatural mystery under study took place . I mention this because many people don’t know or don’t remember that the Amsterdam apparitions were formally and duly approved by the bishops of the Diocese of Harlin in Amsterdam, where the Marian apparition to the visionary Ida Perderman occurred . The first to approve it was Bishop Enricus Bomers, who granted permission for public veneration of Our Lady of All Nations in 1996. And the full and definitive approval was given by his successor, Bishop Joseph Mariano Spunt, in 2002, who issued both the definitive approval and the declaration of supernatural authenticity. This approval is publicly available in Dutch and English. Anyone can find it online, or if you prefer , write to me and I’ll gladly share it. But note that it has the highest level of approval a supernatural event can receive—the very level that confirms its supernatural nature. It’s the highest approval rating that exists. In other words, many people are unaware of this because it hasn’t been properly understood. It hasn’t been properly reported that Amsterdam has the highest level of approval the Catholic Church can grant to a supernatural manifestation, which confirms its supernatural nature. This approval is dated none other than May 31, 2002—the very date on which we prophetically know the fifth Marian dogma will be approved. Now, in addition to Amsterdam’s complete approval, Heaven prophetically protected this apparition. Heaven has many ways of confirming the truth of something, and one way is by giving prophecies that come true. Here I will list six prophecies from the Amsterdam revelation that have already been fulfilled. The first, one of the most impressive, was that the Virgin told Ida Perderman the exact day the Netherlands would be liberated from Nazi occupation. Ida Perderman had a spiritual director, a priest in her diocese. And she took everything the Virgin told her, everything she revealed, to him. So he knew all these prophecies in advance. Why? So that when the prophecies were fulfilled, he could testify that he knew the prophecy before it came to pass. That is to say, Ida’s spiritual director knew the date the Nazis were going to leave Holland. Once the prophecy was fulfilled, he had no choice but to accept it, to testify that Ida had indeed received that prophecy. And let’s remember that only God knows the future. Satan is very clever, but Satan doesn’t see the future, he doesn’t know the future. Satan only knows what God has revealed in the Holy Scriptures. But only God could have known the date of the Nazi occupation. And she also prophesied the Balkan Wars, in which Yugoslavia disintegrated, the Gulf War—the first one, in 1991—and the one in which she predicted that China would become a communist republic, something that couldn’t be known at the time of this prophecy. She also foretold the arrival of man on the moon and the moment of Pope Pius X’s death. I’m not going to get into a discussion here about whether the moon landing in ’69 was real or a hoax. I’m not interested. I can assure you that man has reached the moon, I don’t know if in ’69 or at some later time, but that he arrived, that man has reached the moon, I have not the slightest doubt. Why? Because the Virgin Mary revealed it to Ida Perderman in Amsterdam. That’s why I say, I’m not going to get into a debate about whether it happened in ’69 or later. I don’t know. No, and I don’t want to get into that debate. I’m just saying, man did land on the moon, and the Virgin Mary prophesied it to Ida Perderman. And these six prophecies came true. The most impressive of them, and one that contributed most to the approval of Amsterdam, was that she received this text, which is below in purple. It reads: “This Holy Father, Pope Pius XII, will be taken to be with us at the beginning of October of this year.” She received it at the beginning of the year Pius XII died, which was 1958; I don’t recall if it was January or February. Ida Perderman did what she always did. She took the prophecy to her spiritual director, and in this case, she placed it, as the Virgin Mary instructed, in two sealed envelopes that couldn’t be read by holding them up to the light. Ida kept one, and she asked her spiritual director to keep the other safe and not open it until the day the prophecy was fulfilled. Indeed, at the beginning of October 1958, Pius XII died. I don’t remember the date, I think he died around October 12th or something like that, I don’t remember the exact date, but on the exact day Pius XII died, Perderman went to his spiritual director’s house and said to him, “Father, please open the envelope because the prophecy inside has just been fulfilled.” He couldn’t find it. He had also hidden the envelope he couldn’t find. Perderman got very nervous and started praying to the Virgin Mary to help the priest, his spiritual director, find it because it was very important that he find it. And finally he found it, only he had hidden it so much that he didn’t even remember where he had put it. What a surprise for this priest who opens the envelope and finds the prophecy that He had delivered it approximately 89 months earlier, announcing the death of Pope Pius XII for the beginning of October. Let’s remember that Satan doesn’t know the date we will die. Satan neither writes history nor knows the future. Let’s not make Satan a demigod or a quasi-god. No, Satan is extremely intelligent, of course he is, but Satan doesn’t know the future, he can’t know it. In fact, I love the book I mentioned earlier, Mystical City of God, because it demonstrates how God confuses Satan and hides things from him. When Jesus was already born, he didn’t even know that he was the Messiah, nor that Mary was the woman of the prophecy of Isaiah— excuse me, well, not of Isaiah 7:14, the pregnant Virgin, nor of Genesis 3:15. That is to say, Satan didn’t know that she was the Mother of the Messiah nor that Jesus was the Messiah. Why? Because he supposedly had a father named Saint Joseph, Satan always said, “No, this can’t be the one who’s going to crush me, she can’t be the Mother of the Messiah, and this child can’t be the Messiah.” Why? Because he has a father on Earth. In other words, she was hiding very important things from Satan to confuse him. That is, Satan only understands what God allows him to understand, and he only knows what God allows him to know. Let’s not make Satan a god. Let’s not give him powers or prerogatives that Satan doesn’t have. So this prophecy was very important because it was used in the Amsterdam approval process, because this prophecy was sent to the Vatican. That is, the spiritual director, through his bishop, notified the Pope that a woman was receiving prophecies that were all being fulfilled. In other words, everyone was assured that the Amsterdam apparition came from heaven, because neither Ida, Perderman, nor Satan could have known that Pius X was going to die in early October 1958. So, all of this was part of the process of appreciating Amsterdam and its declaration of supernatural origin . Well, Akita also confirms Amsterdam because they are sister apparitions. Just as Amran had two approvals from two bishops, Akita also had two approvals. First from Bishop John Choirojito and then from his successor, Bishop Francisco Sato. And it was also confirmed by Joseph Ratzinger when he was Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. So, the approval of Akita confirms Amsterdam. Why? Because Akita is a wooden image of Our Lady of All Nations, meaning they are completely associated. This is what I call cross-confirmations. Heaven has many ways of confirming that something is true, and one way is by closely associating Akita with Amsterdam, and the Virgin wept, sweated, and bled. One hundred and one tears. And look how interesting. Many of these manifestations of this wooden statue took place in the chapel with Bishop John Shojiroito physically present. I believe this is quite unique because it has very rarely happened that the bishop of the diocese himself is present at the moment of the manifestation. That is to say, there was no need to convince the bishop that the Virgin was crying, bleeding, sweating, because he himself, as bishop, would take samples with cotton and have them analyzed in laboratories in Japan. He himself witnessed what was happening with this image, which obviously led to one of the fastest apparitions in Akita, and I believe the fastest approval in the history of a Marian apparition, because it was evident and in the presence of the bishop himself. And the image of Akita is none other than Our Lady of All Nations. That is why Bishop Hito categorically stated that the miracle of Akita confirms the authenticity of the Amsterdam messages, since the statue that wept and bled is a sculpted image of Our Lady of All Nations. In other words, Akita also confirms Amsterdam. And in Akita, he said something very interesting. He prayed the Rosary a lot. “Only I can still save those who oppose their trust in me from the approaching calamities—forgive me, those who place their trust in me will be saved.” How interesting that in Akita, which is proven by the Church, Mary is placed as a savior, as a savior, on the same level as Jesus. And we see it that way too. In Amsterdam, where she had said she comes as co-redemptrix, mediator, and advocate. And in the message of March 20, 1953, she says, “It is Mary, the Lady of all nations, who gives you this message with this title. She will save the world.” That is, both in Akita and in Amsterdam, she positions herself as savior. As savior. Just as Jesus is our savior, Mary is our savior, meaning that redemption and co-redemption are completely related and on the same level. On the same level, I repeat, not Mary at a lower level than Jesus, but on the same level. How interesting that the last message from Akita was on August 3, 1973, and then there was no message until 46 years later, on the day the Synod of the Amazon began—the perverse Synod of the Amazon—which began on October 6, 2019. And on that day, after Agnes Sagagua, the visionary of Akita, had gone 46 years without seeing the Virgin, without any manifestation, that day she appeared to her and said, “It is fitting that I tell this to everyone. Cover your heads with ashes and pray the penitential rosary every day, and you must become like a child and offer sacrifices every day.” She arrived with a message similar to Jonah’s preaching in Nineveh when he told the city, “Your destruction is condemned unless you cover your heads with ashes and clothe yourselves in salt, from the king to the lowliest, even the slave and the cow. ” Everyone in Nineveh understood that the prophecy was true and covered themselves with salt and ashes to ask God for forgiveness and thus avoid the destruction of Nineveh. The Virgin’s message on October 6, 2019, is similar to Jonah’s in Nineveh. Cover your heads and pray the penitential rosary because the final catastrophe, the final punishment, is already decreed. The difference is that Jonah was listened to. In contrast, we are not listening to the Virgin Mary, so the punishment seems irreversible. Well, to conclude, let’s see how the image of Our Lady of All Nations has, in its iconography, in its design, the three parts of the fifth dogma. Let’s see her as mediator, because Mary is pouring out her graces upon the world with open hands. Those who have seen this image, the original one there in Amsterdam, can see in great detail how these rays emanate from Mary’s hand, as if pouring out her grace upon the world, as is also seen on the Miraculous Medal. She is also an advocate, because she stands between us and the cross, that is, between us and the Just Judge. And she is also co-redemptrix because she bears the stigmata in her hands. In printed holy cards, they are almost invisible, but I had the immense joy of visiting Our Lady of All Nations in Amsterdam; that is, I saw the original image there in Amsterdam, and the stigmata , the marks of the nails in the hands of the Virgin Mary, are clearly visible, which tells us that she is co-redemptrix. Therefore, the iconography of this image incorporates the three parts of the fifth Marian dogma in its design. And the design of this image was given by the Virgin herself; that is, it is not an invention of Perderman. Thus, the Virgin… He asked that this painting be done. And what does this have to do with anything? This is the last item on the agenda to wrap things up. What does it have to do with the Miraculous Medal? Well, the Miraculous Medal has this M, which, as I’ve mentioned in other programs, is a prophecy about the five Marian apparitions of the Virgin Mary in 19th-century France: Paris in 1830, La Salette in 1846, Lourdes in 1858, Pont in 1871, and Peléwasan in 1876. The first of these was Paris in 1830. This discovery isn’t mine; I simply confirmed it on Google Earth. I placed these five Marian apparition sites on the map of France, and when I connected them with a line, this M appeared, which you can see here on the right. Right in the center of the M, above it, is this little town called Dozulé, which I also had the immense joy of visiting on one of my trips to France. It’s right in the middle of the M, above, which tells us that the cross that is The image on the Miraculous Medal is none other than the Cross of Dozulé. And in Dozulé, the Virgin— or rather, Jesus—Dozulé belongs to Jesus. That is to say, the five apparitions of Mary in the 19th century. In France, they anticipate an apparition of Jesus in the 20th century, specifically the one at Dozulé. And at Dozulé, Jesus told her that on that mountain he would judge humanity. So, it seems possible— I’m not saying this with certainty, but as a hypothesis—that the judgment of the nations will take place there in Dozulé. And let’s look at the Miraculous Medal: the Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary, which are below the letter M, are at the same level. That is, the Sacred Heart of Jesus crowned with thorns and that of Mary pierced by a sword are not higher than that of Jesus; they are at the same level. In other words, the Miraculous Medal also explains to us the relationship between redemption and co-redemption, that is, Mary’s leading role on the same level as Jesus’, because that is how the Father ordained it: to save humanity through the two Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary. The cross requested at Dozulé wasn’t made; a 738-meter cross was requested. If it had been built, it would have been approximately two and a half times taller than the Eiffel Tower, but since it wasn’t, Jesus commanded thousands of crosses to be made around the world at a scale of 1 to 100, that is, one-hundredth. It’s interesting that we see Jesus in images of Christ the King with the globe in his hand and a cross on top. Well, that cross could be the same cross that’s on the Miraculous Medal, which is the Cross of Dozulé. Why? Because the “M” that appears in these five Marian apparitions of the 19th century in France is obviously the “M” for Mary, but it could also be the “M” for Medal, for miraculous, and for mountain. That is to say, the “M” could also represent Mount Dozulé, on which this cross that Christ asked to be made in Dozulé was to be erected. It could be not only the M of Mary over France, but also the M of mountain, which is on that mountain where the cross of Dozulé was to be made. In other words, there is a very beautiful prophetic mystery in the Miraculous Medal, and it is completely related to the mystery of redemption and co-redemption. Not only because the two hearts of Jesus and Mary are at the same level, but also because the M of Mary is intertwined with the cross of Christ. And besides, Jesus, God, doesn’t miss a single detail. The visionary of Dozulé is named Madelén Aumondt, and Aumondt in French means “to the mountain” or “on the mountain.” So, well, this is a very interesting prophetic mystery, but there is a complete relationship between the mystery of the Miraculous Medal and the mystery revealed in Amsterdam that Mary will be proclaimed co-redemptrix of humanity. That is to say, all of us who wear the Miraculous Medal on our chests profess our belief in Mary as co-redemptrix. I always carry, I never part with, a crucifix I wear on my chest and a Miraculous Medal, because I consecrated myself to the Virgin Mary on November 27th, the Feast of the Miraculous Medal. On my chest, among other things, on that Miraculous Medal, I wear the Cross of Dozulé, and I carry confirmation that Mary is Co-Redemptrix on the same level as Jesus. Everyone who wears the Miraculous Medal is confessing that Mary is Co-Redemptrix with Jesus. So, where are the three parts of the fifth Marian dogma found on the Miraculous Medal? And with this, we conclude. Where are the three parts of the fifth Marian dogma found on the Miraculous Medal? Mediatrix , because she goes forth pouring out her graces upon the world. Advocate, because it says, “O Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.” That, that is the role of the Advocate, to intercede for us. Our Advocate, pray for us. And the one about Co-Redemptrix, because, as I said before, the cross of Christ is intertwined with the M of Mary, and because the Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary are at the same level. In other words, on the obverse of the Miraculous Medal are the dogmas of Mediatrix and Advocate. And on the reverse is the dogma of Co-Redemptrix. What does this mean? That whoever wears the Miraculous Medal professes acceptance of the three parts of the fifth Marian dogma. Let us listen to Heaven, not to the Masonic Vatican. And well, what a joy that in Amsterdam the Virgin Mary instructed us to ask for the dissemination of the Amsterdam prayer because, as I said at the beginning, with the dissemination of this image of Amsterdam, Excuse me, by sharing this image, which we must share, and praying the Amsterdam prayer daily, we ask for both the proclamation of the fifth Marian dogma and the outpouring of the second Pentecost. It is an order, a mandate given to us by the Virgin. Let us be obedient to our Blessed Mother. Let us pray the Amsterdam prayer daily without fail to ask for the fifth Marian dogma and for us to receive this second Pentecost. So, well, we conclude with this statement. The time has come to openly fight against the devil and his henchmen, enlisting in the army led by the woman clothed with the sun, Mary Most Holy, who will lead the battle and the greatest triumph of God and the Church. This is the triumph of her Immaculate Heart. The Virgin wants to use her consecrated children to establish the Kingdom of Christ on earth. These consecrated children of Mary are the apostles of the end times, prophesied by Saint Louis Marie Grignion de Montfort in his treatise on true devotion to Mary. We must be faithful, holy, and strive to be among them. And for this reason, we must all consecrate ourselves to the Immaculate Heart of Mary and pray the Amsterdam prayer daily. Let us defend our Blessed Mother. Let us defend her dogmas, her prerogatives. Let us fight against the infernal dragon that spews forth a river of waters to swallow the Virgin or to overshadow her, to diminish Marian devotion. Let us not accept these heresies, these blasphemies, and this attack against the Virgin. Let us go forth as true soldiers of the Virgin, defending her. Let us go forth and proclaim, Mary is Co-Redemptrix, she is Advocate, and she is Mediatrix of all graces. Let us not be deceived. Now, Miguel Leopoldo, we can move on to a final discussion or a short round of questions and answers. Well, Mauricio, what a beautiful presentation! The evidence is so overwhelming that what they have stated is truly absurd. But anyway, let’s continue discussing and perhaps go into more detail about what you’ve been mentioning, but if you’d like, we can start with the document itself, with the heart of the document. By the way, we’ll now show the video that illustrates the controversy surrounding the presentation of this document by Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, which states that the title of co-redemptrix should not be used in reference to the Virgin Mary. The pontifical decree in the international manner. Did you see the family? Yes. 2000 arrabbiato and judge the sacrifice of the son. This idea, unfortunately, was veicolata, creating a fraternity of the Trinity, which could be acceptable. Mary would become the co-redemptrix in front of the justice of the Trinity. Basically, in the video, we see these two priests discussing the document that has been presented regarding the co-redemptrix of the Virgin Mary. The cause of the conflict is that from the podium you see on the right, presided over by Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, who, as you know, is the Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, he is saying that the idea of ​​co-redemption has been distorted and is creating a fracture within the Trinity, which is unacceptable. Therefore, Mary would be positioned as a shield against God’s justice. We will also now quote point 22 of the document Mater Popoli Fidelis, which is quite extensive, but it is in this specific point 22 that it literally states that the title of Co-Redemptrix somehow obscures the unique mediation of Christ and should be avoided because it is inappropriate and pastorally unsuitable. I will read it verbatim so that our brothers and sisters listening can follow along. He says, “Given the need to explain Mary’s subordinate role in Christ’s work of redemption, it is always inappropriate to use the title of co-redemptrix to define Mary’s cooperation. This title risks obscuring Christ’s unique salvific mediation and, therefore, can generate confusion and an imbalance in the harmony of truths of the Christian faith. For, and now he quotes Acts 4:12, “There is salvation in no one else, “For under heaven there is no other name given to mankind by which we must be saved.” However, if we look at this text, Mauricio, he himself acknowledges that Mary cooperated in the work of salvation. That is to say, contradictions arise here, and one thinks, well, wouldn’t it be more coherent to explain the term properly instead of suppressing a word that all the saints, that all the popes have always used in a subordinate sense, and because what he is signing is what Protestants and Evangelicals have always been saying? Don’t you think so, Mauricio? What both Tucho Fernández and Leo XIV, who approved that document, are demonstrating is that they are on the opposite side, that is, that they are enemies because only the opposing side does not want the fifth dogma to be proclaimed. The Virgin said in After that when it is proclaimed, She will definitively defeat Satan, his agents, and bring true peace to the world and the triumph of her Immaculate Heart. So, the only way to understand this spiritually is that Tucho Fernández and Leo XIV are on the opposite side, in The side of Satan, the side of evil. And that’s why they don’t want her to be called Co-Redemptrix or for the dogma to be proclaimed, because they know that when it is proclaimed, their total and definitive defeat will come. So, they are going to resist that proclamation as much as they can. For now, they can’t stop it because it is God’s will and it will be done, but they have to hold it back and resist it as much as possible because, as enemies, as the opposing side, they want to avoid or delay their defeat. Yes, but for years now we have been witnessing many statements that are worrying, that, whether you like it or not, are sowing a very dangerous seed that must be eradicated, but it’s taking root in many Catholics who are not educated, who are not aware, who don’t bother to read these kinds of documents or discern them. Like, for example, Pope Francis did when he stated that all religions are a path to God, as if all religions were the same. Recently, the Cardinal of Rabat, I don’t know if you heard him too, stated that we must abandon To abandon the false paradigm of true religion, of false religion, and adding that no religion possesses the truth. I mean, how can a cardinal say this? I mean, he’s stating that he doesn’t believe the Catholic religion is the true religion. I mean, he’s rejecting Christ as the only savior and that He is the only way to the Father. Then, when Jesus said, “Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature,” if all are the same and none possess the truth, then what Jesus said to his apostles would be absurd. I mean, we are witnessing a succession of very dangerous statements for true faith and sound doctrine, and what’s most worrying is that they are coming from within the Church. These statements are not only heresy, but a betrayal of Christ and the Catholic Church. That’s what they are, in short. But I’ll tell you what the root of the problem is. The root of the problem is that most Catholics haven’t understood that the Vatican is no longer the seat of the Catholic Church. The Vatican was, for many centuries, the seat of the Church. The seat of the Catholic Church. What most Catholics haven’t understood is that it’s no longer the Vatican. It’s the seat of Satan, it’s the cave of hell. It’s, as they say in English, Satan’s headquarters on earth. That’s what the Vatican is, that is, the seat of ecclesiastical Freemasonry . So, that’s why people get stressed when they see the news that the Vatican said, or the Pope said, that Mariano is a co-redeemer, the Pope said this or that, but you’re not understanding that the Vatican is no longer the seat of the Catholic Church. The Vatican has been taken over by the enemy. So, what the Vatican says is the word of the enemy, of the opposing side. It’s the word of Satan, it’s the work of Satan. So, as long as people continue to think that the Vatican is the seat of the Catholic Church, then they fall into that confusion you’re talking about. But whoever understands that the Vatican is no longer the seat of the Catholic Church, doesn’t let themselves be confused by these heresies. Of course, if we go into a little more detail about the compelling evidence against this document, which we’ll look at in parts. For example, if we deny the Virgin’s mediation, then we could perfectly well say, as you’ve been mentioning throughout your presentation, what sense do, for example, the prayers of the Church have, such as the Hail Mary, the Salve Regina, the Angelus, the Subtun Presidium, which is a very interesting prayer that I don’t know if you’re familiar with, that I discovered—well, that I discovered—as part of the research for the book I mentioned I was working on, which I hope will be published in December, God willing. This prayer , which is very beautiful—I’ll see if I can find it—is very interesting because it dates back to the third century and is believed to be the oldest surviving Marian prayer. It was found on a Greek papyrus in Osirhynchus, invoking the Virgin Mary in classical Greek. She is already referred to in the third century as Theotokos, that is, as Mother of God, even though, as you know, that dogma wasn’t approved until the Council of Ephesus in the fifth century. So, as early as the third century, a prayer was being offered to her, addressing her as Mother of God. The formula is this: “We fly to your protection.” The fact that this prayer appears in the third century suggests that it may have originated in the second or first century, but the document is already on a papyrus in the third century. And it says, “Now, under your protection we seek refuge, Holy Mother of God. Do not despise the supplications we address to you in our needs. Rather, deliver us always from all dangers , O glorious, glorious, and blessed Virgin.” That is, this in the third century, which could be from the second or first century, is a direct connection almost with the apostles or with the direct successors of the apostles; that is, the first Christian communities were already speaking of the Virgin as “under your protection we seek refuge.” So, if she is neither mediator, nor co-redemptrix, nor advocate, under what protection are they then placing themselves, Holy Mother of God, when two centuries earlier they were already saying that she was the Mother of God? And then it says to always deliver us from all dangers, that is, they place themselves in her hands so that she may deliver them from danger. That is, they are saying that the Virgin is everything that is being mentioned. It is extremely interesting that this was already happening in the third century. At the very least, meaning we could be talking about the second or first century, and as we were saying, all the prayers of the Church appear there. She also appears on the Miraculous Medal, as you’ve been mentioning, in the prayer of the Carmelite scapular, and throughout it we ask again and again, ” Pray for us.” And we are acknowledging that her intercession is not only necessary, but effective and concrete. And we also see the Church Fathers who have always called her the new Eve, the cause of salvation, and the saints who have always called her Queen of Martyrs, Mother of Mercy, Treasure of Graces. The popes from Leo XIII to Pius XII, as you mentioned, have proclaimed her Mediatrix of all graces. So, a current document cannot supersede the teaching and tradition of the entire Church. In some ways, it will damage the continuity of tradition, but on top of that, it claims it’s to avoid confusion. Wouldn’t it be more fruitful, more beneficial to properly form the faithful than to restrict Marian language? But of course, behind all this, the question remains: What I’m asking you, Mauricio, because I see it clearly, is that we are moving, or they want to move, towards a single Church, right? And we have to remove elements that could cause friction with other religions, other beliefs, I understand, and we have to prepare ourselves because there will be continuity. I imagine they might dare to touch the figure of Jesus and try to present him as a prophet. To touch the Mass, Transubstantiation, even the Trinity, but it all seems a bit excessive to me, but they will touch all of that in some way so that they can create that single Church, right? There is evidence even from the second century of Church Fathers who were already advocating Mary’s leading, preponderant role in salvation with Christ is evident. We have, for example, the book Against Heresies or Against Heretics by St. Irenaeus of Leon, a work so important that it is referenced 23 times in the catechism. There we see how this Holy Father of the Church in the second century already elevated Mary’s true role in the salvation of humankind. And like the other Holy Fathers of the Church, and since then, from the Patristic period to the eight popes I mentioned in the exposition and a dozen saints, the Church has, in fact, confirmed for 2,000 years what Mary truly is. That is to say, Mary as Co-Redemptrix is ​​not something we learned about through Amsterdam; it is the prophetic confirmation that the dogma would be proclaimed. But the support comes not only from Sacred Scripture, but also from the Patristic period. Therefore, there is no doubt that this is so. It is completely theologically, doctrinally, and biblically supported that Mary is co-redeemer, advocate, and mediatrix of all graces. What the Vatican has been doing since Bergoglio is demonstrating that they do not work for God, they are not on God’s side, but rather on the opposing side. And as enemies—Freemasons, infiltrators, Satanists, and so on— they obviously have to resist the prophecies as much as they can, but they cannot stop them . Neither Satan nor all the powers of hell combined can halt a divine decree or the will of God. They may delay it, hinder it, or whatever, but they cannot prevent its fulfillment. So, everything they are doing demonstrates that they are enemies and traitors. I have said on more than one occasion, and I reiterate it, that Leo XIII is the religious antichrist. That is, in him the most critical aspect of La Salette was fulfilled. Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the Antichrist. At La Salette, the Virgin warned us of a religious Antichrist, an Antichrist Pope who is Leo XIV. And although many people are upset with me for saying that Leo XIV is the religious Antichrist, he himself will prove me right, and he is proving me right with all the things he does and all the things he will do. What are the two main prophecies associated with the Antichrist Pope? That is, with the religious Antichrist? Well, the unification of all religions, the single world religion at the service of the New World Order, what the Venerable Fulton Sheen called the Confederation of Religions, which is nothing other than the mystical body of Satan. And he is doing this with great force, very rapidly, and with many giant strides. Leo XIV. So, by consolidating the single world religion, which is the greatest and final betrayal of Christ, he confirms that he is the religious Antichrist. And with the suppression of the perpetual sacrifice, which is prophesied in Daniel and referred to by Jesus in the Gospels, when he suppresses the Mass, he will definitively confirm that he is the religious antichrist. So, what good does it do for people to get upset with me because I publicly declare that Leo XIV is the antichrist? He himself is confirming it with these actions and will confirm it with the fulfillment of all the prophecies associated with the religious antichrist. Of course, because we must clarify that although this document, which Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, as head of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, presented in such a controversial way , is signed by the Pope, by Leo XIV. In other words, we can’t say that he doesn’t know about it or that it’s happening behind his back. Well, he’s a cardinal, an anti-cardinal, who is head of an anti-dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith. That is to say, because referring to him as the cardinal head of the dicastery seems to give him authority, doesn’t it? Well, it’s within the organization they have today in the Vatican, so people understand, and if they want to search for it online, they can find it. Of course, but what I’m trying to say is that we have to understand that this Vatican no longer has anything to do with the Catholic Church; it’s the opposing side, it’s the enemy. And in fact, this anti-cardinal who heads this anti-dicastery for the anti-photography and blasphemy. An outrage. Where he places— it’s rude, horrifying. Yes, yes, yes, yes. He places the ecstasy that the saints experience when they have An encounter with Jesus on the level of an orgasm. I mean, what a horrifying and disgusting thing to think that when a nun experiences ecstasy through an encounter with her beloved or her husband Jesus Christ, it translates into an orgasm or something genital. I mean, what a horrifying and disgusting thing. That ‘s the one they want to convince me is the head of a dicastery. That’s the one they want to convince me is a cardinal and holds a position in the Catholic Church. The only explanation is that he’s a heretic, a blasphemer, and we shouldn’t listen to him because he’s an enemy of God and of the truth. Yes. That’s an insult to tradition, and to figures—well, such an important position that has been held by such illustrious figures as Benedict XVI. It’s outrageous. It’s outrageous. It’s a denial of everything logical and sound, a departure from sound doctrine, as you’re saying, that’s obvious. If we reason. I was listening to you, and so many things came to mind— there are so many, we couldn’t list hundreds of possible cases—but I was thinking of more possible proofs of, let’s say, the role of Our Lady, the Virgin Mary. For example, I was thinking of the Wedding at Cana, which is even mentioned in this document. And if we think about the Wedding at Cana, well, the Bible itself is a great learning experience for future generations, but what we see is that the Wedding at Cana is a marvel, like how they first go to the Virgin saying, “We have run out of wine,” and then how she goes to her Son. And He not only listens to her, but He anticipates her request and lovingly grants it. And what does she say? Well, she says, “Do whatever she tells you.” In other words, there is a clearer, more detailed description of how her intercession works and how we should approach her. And that is in the Gospels, so there can be no doubt about the faith. A second thought that struck me as interesting was the apparition of the Virgin Mary in Zaragoza, by the Ebro River. This was the first apparition of the Virgin, the only one she made during her lifetime, where the Basilica of Our Lady of the Pillar now stands. There, the Virgin appeared to James, who was very discouraged because he didn’t know whether to abandon his apostolate in Hispania, since no one listened to him, no one was converting . Everything changed after this apparition. And of course, it’s very interesting to consider that if the document says she doesn’t have a relevant role, or that Heaven doesn’t want to give her one, how could she appear to James? Because two things could have happened. Either James had come to her in prayer, asking for her intercession as Mother of God, which would speak to the enormous role the Virgin already held after the death of Jesus in the early Christian communities and among the first apostles. And that’s why she appeared to him. Case two, where he prayed directly to Jesus asking for his help, and Jesus sent his Mother, thus granting her an even greater role than in the first case. In other words, if we consider just these two examples of the many that exist, we are revealing that from the very beginning of the Church, the Virgin Mary has had an active, visible, and heavenly-authorized role in an incredible evangelizing and apostolic mission. To your beautiful contribution, I would like to add another important comment from a true Cardinal Albert Van Joye, not like Tucho, who is an anti-Cardinal. This is a true cardinal, a lover of the Virgin Mary, who wrote a beautiful book that I highly recommend; it is still available in Catholic bookstores. It is called *The Mass, a Life Offered*. In that beautiful book that helps us appreciate and better understand the Holy Mass, Cardinal Albert Van Hoye tells us that Jesus not only came through Mary in His First Coming, because it was in her womb that the Son of God was conceived and born, but that in every Holy Mass there is not only transubstantiation, but also through the womb of the Blessed Virgin Mary. In other words, Mary not only brought us the Messiah. In every Mass there is transubstantiation, and we can receive Communion only because the Son comes through Mary in every Holy Mass. Transubstantiation takes place through her womb. When I read that, I couldn’t believe it. I was speechless. So happy. He was about to cry with emotion. There is no Eucharist, no Transubstantiation, no Holy Mass, except through the most pure, most holy, and virginal womb of the Virgin Mary. So let us not be led astray by these heretics and blasphemers of today who are enemies. Let us listen to true cardinals like Albert Booye and to the true popes who spoke to us of Mary as Co-Redemptrix, and to the true saints, as Saint Teresa of Calcutta referred to, who confirmed that Mary is Co-Redemptrix. Let us be defenders of the Virgin, let us be true apostles of the End Times, being ready to do anything for our Mother, even to give our lives for her and to defend her dogmas and her prerogatives. We must reach that level, to the desire to give our lives to defend Mary, her dogmas, her prerogatives, and her glories. What a beautiful reflection, Mauricio. Well, yes, I think we have reached the end. As always, time has caught up with us, no matter how much we want to hurry, but the topic is so interesting, so beautiful. And well, dear brothers and sisters, we have heard arguments, reflections, truths that resonate in the very depths of the Catholic faith. The document Mater Populis Fedidelis does not deny Mary Most Holy, but it limits her, reduces her, confines her to a devotional framework that does not correspond to the greatness that God Himself bestowed upon her. The betrayal, Scripture, the saints, prayers, apparitions, and even the humblest spiritual signs tell us otherwise: that Mary is not a mere spectator, but the cooperator par excellence, the Mother who participates in redemption by divine will, the Co-Redemptrix of all Graces who is always united to and subordinate to Christ, the only redeemer of the world. To deny this is not to protect the faith, it is to impoverish it. For if Christ is the sun, Mary would be like the mirror that reflects His light without diminishing it. If Jesus is the Redeemer, Mary is the one who freely associates herself with his sacrifice, offering the Son she loved and receiving all humanity as her children. From her “Let it be done,” her “Fiat,” as you mentioned earlier, Mauricio, to “There is your mother.” Everything about her has been a continuous and resounding “yes” to God. And that “yes” resonates in every miracle, in every shrine, in every soul that prays the rosary and trusts in her intercession. Therefore, with all due respect, but with complete clarity, we say today from this channel that no document, no theological trend, and no ecumenical pressure can erase what Heaven has revealed and the faithful have experienced for 2,000 years. That is to say, Mary Most Holy is, was, and always will be Co-Redemptrix because she cooperated with the Redeemer, Mediatrix because she intercedes for her children, and Advocate because she defends them before the Throne of God. And she is so not by human decision, but because the Most Holy Trinity has so ordained it. And She is the Queen of Heaven and Earth , the Woman clothed with the Sun, the one who crushes the serpent’s head and who will ultimately triumph in Her Immaculate Heart. Defending Her is not an act of rebellion, but an act of love, faith, and gratitude, because without Her the Word would not have become flesh, and without Her “Yes,” the world would still be waiting for redemption. Before we say goodbye, we want to express our deepest gratitude to our dear guest, Mauricio Ozaeta, for joining us and for explaining, as clearly and didactically as he always does, the beautiful role of our Blessed Mother Mary, a role given to her by Heaven for the salvation of humankind. Mauricio, thank you so much, and if you would like to add a few final words before we say goodbye, I simply want to thank you for this opportunity you gave me to defend our Blessed Mother. May God bless all who watch this video, and may everything we do always be as the Virgin taught us, for the Glory of God, the honor of the Holy Name of Jesus Christ, and the salvation of souls. Amen. Amen. So be it. I also want to thank all of you who are with us. Don’t forget to like, share, comment, and subscribe, because there are many souls who need to hear these truths that sustain and strengthen their faith. And as always, we say goodbye by asking God to bless you, protect you, and keep you. Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee. And today it would be fitting to add, Mary Most Holy, Co-Redemptrix of All Graces, pray for us. Amen. Amen. Thank you very much.