Forget doping—pro cycling’s most impactful unfair advantage is hiding in plain sight. This video exposes the truth about TV motorbikes and team cars create powerful slipstreams that change races like the Tour de France, often determining stage wins.

From Tim Wellens’ 2025 victory (where Quinn Simmons was very vocal) to infamous cases involving Pogačar and Roglič, we dive into the science, history, and politics of motor drafting. With insights from wind tunnel studies, rider testimonies, and expert opinions, we explore how camera bikes can tip the scales—and why the current rules are failing.

This is a clip, if you would like to check out the full video click here – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnJ4mcERkaA

The podcast wouldn’t be possible without our amazing sponsors:

NOMIO is clinically proven to:
Lower lactate levels, Reduce oxidative stress, Improve training adaptations And deliver a noticeable boost from the very first dose.
Go to ⁠www.drinknomio.com⁠ to check out this game changing supplement.

4iiii
Ready to elevate your cycling game? Trust the 4iiii PRECISION 3+ Powermeter—precision, performance, and peace of mind, all in one.
Learn more by visiting http://www.4iiii.com

REAP
Custom Carbon Composition Bikes made in the UK. REAP’s gravel bike is set to redefine gravel riding with 50mm+ tyre clearance https://reapbikes.com/

On stage 15 of the 2025 tour of France, the breakaway thunder towards Carcasson, Tim Wellins of United Arab Emirates, a breakaway specialist given freedom from his domestique duties helping team leader Togatcha. He leapt away more than 40 km from the finish. There was a really good group of chasers behind, including the American champion from Little Trek, Quinn Simmons. The group hesitated for its split second and the gap out to Wellins absolutely ballooned. Wellins will go on to win the stage. However, the drama started just after the finish line. Simmons in a post-race interview to ITV said, “The strongest guy in the best moment with the moto won today. This is the third time this week that I think moto drivers have played a little part in the victory here. It’s unfortunate, but we know this is the game of the tour. Lucky if you’re the one that gets away, you get this advantage and there’s no chance for the group behind.” And anybody who watched that stage, I remember watching it and thinking like, how is this allowed? Anybody who watched it and seeing that TV feed, seeing the motorcycle camera sitting just ahead of Wellins, giving him a pocket of still air. In his winners’s press conference, Wellins, he totally refuted this. He said, “It’s a little bit optimistic to say I won because of the moto. My legs did the work.” Yeah, that’s partially true. Many fans and even cycling journalists, they reflectively default to what about doping? When a solo move sticks or we see an incredible superhuman performance inside the Pelaton, when I chat to riders, when I chat to directors and coaches on the podcast, no one’s talking about doping anymore. The chat is different. They’re asking, “Did a motorbike just decide a stage of the tour to France?” Was the biggest performance enhancer that Sunday when Tim Wellins won? not in somebody’s bloodstream, but right there on our screens. If you’ve ever wondered how the slipstream of a motorbike actually affects a rider, whether there’s a science behind all these complaints and what it actually costs the riders who lose out, strap in because this story goes way beyond a single stage in the tour of France. You’ve heard the expression cycling is a game of marginal gains. Dave Braillesford coined this term, but it really is these days a game of centimeters and watts, tiny margins. a lead vehicle that sits a few meters in front of a cyclist. He changes the entire equation because of drag. Without wind, 80 to 90% of a rers’s power is used to push air out of the way. When a motorbike or car disrupts that air flow, the rider behind sits in a bubble of calmer air. In everyday riding, you might experience this for yourself if you’re ever riding into work or through the city center and you get some draft in behind a bus on a windy day. It feels like it sucks you along. It’s meaningful. It really matters. Research from the Einhovven University and the University of Leazge have quantified the motorbikes effect using wind tunnel tests and computational fluid dynamics. They’ve shown just how much of a slingshot effect motorcycles and cars can give. When a rider is took just a couple of meters behind a TV moto, the air resistance can be cut almost in half. That means at 54 km an hour, they’re effectively doing 67 km an hour for the same power output. A gain of around 14 seconds every minute. Even at 30 m back, the drag drops to about 12%. Roughly, we’re 2.6 seconds per minute. At 50 m, it’s still a 7% saving and more than a second per minute. And the effect isn’t limited to just motorbikes or cars in front of a rider either. A motorbike following a cyclist by a quarter of a meter reduces their drag by roughly 9% and a team car five meters behind can save around six seconds over a short prologue with that gap ballooning over longer time trials. You might remember team Indios a couple of years back or was it last season when they started stacking the team car in time trials with like bundles of spare bikes. Like no one’s going to need 12 bike changes in a time trial, but they would sit back to change that air flow. These are huge margins in a sport where winds are measured in seconds where they’re in sometimes photo finishes. The numbers above come with a big caveat, though. They assume calm winds and constant speed. Crosswinds or headwinds, they can change the effect. But the relationship that I’m talking about here is proximity and advantage. And that’s undeniable. The advantage comes from two effects. The first is called leading vehicle effect. A motorbike ahead pushes air aside and it creates a zone of lower pressure behind it. the rider entering this zone, he’s going to experience less drag, which is why the 2019 study found that a moto 2.5 m in front reduce drag by almost half. Now, secondly, we have following vehicle effect. A vehicle behind a rider reduces the air pressure that normally pulls the rider back and studies found that a team car 5 m behind can save roughly 6 seconds in a short prologue. The effect is stronger with motorcycles because they tend to get a little bit closer to the riders. The combination of these effects explains why breakaway riders try to slot into the camera motos wake when they attack and why chasers sometimes complain that they had absolutely no chance of catching the first rider to spring from a breakaway. We opened with the Tim Wellins Quinn Simmons war awards. Simmons was frustrated by missing a tour to France stage and he told ITV the day was won by the strongest guy in the moment with the best moto. He insisted the slipstream had played a massive role and noted the breakaway riders now have a new thing to consider when they’re thinking about tactics for the final. They have to time their moves to catch the motorbike. Wellins countered that. He said he attacked first and that others equally had an opportunity to attack first. Regardless, the conversation dominated the headlines and it rekindled an old debate. There have been some really high-profile instances of this type through the years. And you know what do we call it? I suppose for one of a better word, it is cheating. One of the most high-profile ones was Pagacha, the goat himself in 2023 Amsterdale gold race. This sparked massive outrage when it looked like the race director’s BM BMW drove directly in front of Pagachcha during his winning attack. Ben Healey was trucking behind and he closed in from 35 seconds, brought Pagacha back to 19 seconds. Then the BMW pulled in front of Pagacha and his lead had ballooned back out to 38 seconds again. Everyone watching this noticed and team manager Jonathan Vort called it out immediately. I think his quote was like, I mean, come on. Again, vehicles are influencing the race. On stage 19 of the 2018 tour, Primos Raglitch attacked over the call to obese and he opened the gap on all his rivals. Dutchman and one of my favorite riders at the time, Tom Dumlan. He fought hard on the descent, but he later blew up completely. In his postrace interview, he said, “I was flying downhill and eventually I got dropped on a straight part just because Primos was in the full slipstream of a motorbike.” Ruggage denied noticing any help from the moto, but the incident reignited calls for stricter distancing rules around motorbike. 2005 was the year. It was Gent Velgum. And this was the first time I really remember noticing the effects of motorbikes and sitting up and thinking to myself in a sport about fairness, this just isn’t fair. It was Juan Antonio Fletcher and he had a healthy lead going into the final until the Belgian rider Niko Mantan caught him inside the final kilometer. Now Fletcher’s team, it was Fasa Bautelli at the time. They protested and they claimed that the neutral support cars and pressed motorbikes pulled Mantan back up. Mantan denied using the cars. Race officials agreed with him, but then weirdly the driver of the car and the neutral support all got fined 400 Swiss Franks and the motorbikes got warned. It was bizarre. Fairness is such a fundamental tenant of cycling. And maybe this hurts a little bit more than it normally would for me on these topics because I’m close to it. I have friends who ride and I can see the consequences for guys I know of the these missed opportunities. Cycling for all its glitz and glamour. It still isn’t football. It’s not the Premier League. Stage winners aren’t on seven figure prize purses. Prize money and UCI points still really matter, especially to lower ranking teams. At the Tour to France, each stage winner earns €11,000 while second place takes 5,500 euro and third takes €2,800. That’s a difference of 5,500 euro between first and second. For a domestic or someone who prides themsself as a breakaway specialist whose salary might be 100,000 euro or less for the year, losing even a single stage because a moto gave their rival a second’s draft, it can mean missing out on an entire month’s salary in a single afternoon. And UCI points, they multiply the stakes. UCI points determine world tour licenses and invites. Missing a stage win can mean the difference between relegation and survival for smaller squads. Those points also influence riders contracts. a handful of extra UCI points from a stage race, it can add tens of thousands of euro to a rider’s next

46 Comments

  1. Till now motorcycles were necessary to deliver pictures. Their impact is huge, huge!
    In future i think drones can do the job. By far not that dangerous and only one guy needed…

  2. load of crap, Simmons is happy to take a draft from a moto as well. As Horner said, Simmons et all had over 40 km to chase a single rider that got a tow for less than a km. Sour grapes, poor tactics

  3. Phil Liggett while commentating the TdF several years ago said "Win a stage of the TdF and the rider is set for life". I imagine this is probably quite true in terms of post racing opportunities. If a stage winner has been assisted by a vehicle or motor bike then for a chasing rider who misses out on the win, the missed opportunities later could be enormous

  4. Add front and rear laser-illuminated no go buffer zones around the motor vehicles in the peloton, with an increased distance over the current norm.

  5. Mara Abbott Rio Olympics 2016. She made a winning move, but unfortunately, with all the press and officials cars behind her she was cheated out of a monster tailwind that came down along the coast on the finishing straight. the chasing group actually had the benefit of the tailwind and having the press and official vehicles in front of them, they caught her with a couple hundred yards to the line and she finished fourth. It was terrible. Fortunately, she handled it with much grace. -U10

  6. I was about to say I use to get behind busses and you get sucked right in and don't have to peddle a stroke and I did it one time for 8 miles and didn't peddle one time.. We also use to Moto pace, and it's almost the same thing. It should be illegal for the TV cycle to even come close to the rider, and a rider should be fined and penalized for moto pacing. This crap has to stop..!! Quinn had every right to call this out! Tim should have never been given that win.

  7. To be fair Wellans sat on all day, then out manoeuvred the strongest riders in the break, by cutting down one side while they were boxed in on the other side when he launched his attack, effectively ensuring noone could react. And as we know a group that size is never going to work together to form an effective chase. I think at the end of the day whether he got an aero assist from the moto or not wouldn't affect the outcome, he was fresher than everyone else in the break, and the break didn't worker together to chase him.

  8. Quinn is a huge whiner. Very strong but doesn’t know race tactics. If winning was only about being the strongest rider, racing would be boring. He needs to learn some race craft.
    I realize this makes a good story for your channel but it’s boring to talk about it too much.
    Remember, Francisco Moser won the Giro with a huge push in the time trial from the race helicopter.

  9. So let’s recap: Wellens launches solo from the back of the group with over 40 km to go. Seven riders behind—plenty of firepower, plenty of time—and yet… in 40 kilometers, they didn’t pull back even a single second. Not one. Not even by accident.

    If I had seen any of them actually try, even just once—3 km, 5 km, whatever—I’d say fine, maybe he had help. But no. Nothing. Total tactical freeze.

    And now, the hot take is: “he got a draft from the moto”? For what—five seconds? Really?

    What’s worse is that this video parrots the talking points of the U.S. national champ, who’d rather cry conspiracy than own up to getting tactically outclassed. And of course, he’s a loud MAGA fanboy—so, I mean, what were we expecting? Reality?

    This isn’t analysis. It’s just desperate clickbait built on a bad take from someone who couldn’t handle losing. Disrespectful to the race, to the rider, and frankly to your audience.
    We’re not all that stupid. Stop treating us like we are.

  10. Wellens had the motorbike in front of him for less than two kilometres before he overtook it on the descent. It then stayed behind him for almost 40km to the line. 

    Behind, seven riders had the chance to work together to pull him back, but couldn't manage to do that. Although Wellens might have got the gap by using the draft from the motorbike, the idea that he won the stage only because of that is nonsense. He won because he was the strongest, cleverest rider. 

    Unfortunately, Quinn Simmons doesn't seem to have the tactical nous to work out how to win – he couldn't even stay with the group that sprinted for third place after Capanaerts had broken away to get second.

  11. I love cycling. I love watching it. I love participating in it. But whatI don’t love is the constant nitpicking. So start a movement to get rid of all the motorbikes and use drones. I couldn’t care less.
    The fact is the Tour de France as an example gets faster every single year and it’s not because a different course layout or dynamic improvements (that mushroom helmet😂😂😂)
    Human beings have a plateau of performance. As far as I’m concerned cycling is still doping never stopped doping currently it’s clear the watch Dogs Don’t know what they’re doing.

  12. I don't like Simmons, he's a TV attacker but he was 100% right. The TV moto was only a few feet in front of Wellens and was the difference

  13. which jersey would you rather have. belgian national champs or american ? the reality is that wellens was just a smarter rider. the option to use the motos, IF this is true, was open to simmons too. you can guarantee wellen's race craft is infinitely better… belgian riders have this in their blood

  14. Tim Wellens did almost no work while Quinn Simmons spent too much time on the front. Yes, drafting off vehicles does occur, that option is available to all the riders (mostly). and is part of racing. The sport is much better when riders that have a crash, nature break or mechanical are paced back to the peloton. Obviously sometimes abuse of drafting off vehicles occurs, but I believe it is part of the sport, as much as strong teams having domestiques working for the leaders. Lastly, Quinn Simmons is a media darling ( I am an American who has lived in Europe and Vietnam, so I feel comfortable saying this, his presentation is why many people don't like American tourists, plus he looks ridiculous). The same options are available to Simmons, but he doesn't have the smarts or skills such as MVP, Wurt or, my favorite Ben Healy.

  15. Sour Grapes springs to mind when another rider(who as used the motorbikes themselves in the past) starts moaning about how he lost the stage, just sour grapes on Quinns behalf, PLUS you have to be within a few feet to get the best effect, its minimal when over a few metres at that speed

  16. It's a tough one. with the number of team vehicles, camera motos, and even officials to not have any impact on the race. It's been brought up in the non-draft triathlon races also (which also adds the restriction of even drafting off of another cyclist). How would you draw the line/penalize for drafting off of a vehicle/motos, especially if that same vehicle is parting the crowds.

  17. It's not cheating, it's just a part of the sport. You can't say the guy on the motor to move away. Btw, in the last stage, Van Aart manage to escape with the help of camera men on moto.

  18. @8:15 – 'Fairness is such a fundamental tenet of cycling'. Nice idea… 'Cheating is such a fundamental tenet of cycling' would surely be a more realistic review of the sport, given all the evidence?
    From the earliest days of intimidation/kidnapping/substance abuse, through the sports long history of doping via any means available; through the nadir of the EPO years to whatever they're getting away with today, drafting behind a motorbike seems small fry, although admittidly annoying.
    I'm not in favour of any of this, but I won't pretend it isn't happening, and I won't let it spoil my enjoyment of the spectacle. When Frank Vandenbroucke buried the competition to win the 1999 Liege-Bastogne-Liege, he may have been pumped full of EPO, but he still left the best of a generation in his dust…
    I suppose a certain amount of cognitive dissonance is required to enjoy cycling guilt free?

    Also, Quinn rode like a lunatic the whole tour. Hats off for effort and he was great to watch, but if he'd targetted all that energy on a couple of stages he'd almost certainly have won one.

  19. As you may have noticed in Binyam Ghirmay's case, the motor cycle hindering/impending his way & cutting his speed on several occasions, obviously the motor cycle zigzagging in the cycle race is hindering the way, forcing the leading cyclist to cut his speed, while competitors take advantage of the open space to come behind & outrun the leading cyclist.

  20. Yep, everyone is still blaming Simmons for a moto sitting 3m in front of Wellens giving him 40 watts. I interject that people are uncomfortable with the fact that their favorite sport has a huge fairness problem and it’s easier to say “blame the athletes, instead of their favorite sport”

  21. Everyone is CLEARLY doped but university doping doesn’t even the playing field. Some teams have a better doping program. The UAE 🇦🇪 sponsor have unlimited funds and don’t like to loose.
    EVERYONE is doped. Let’s speak truth men

  22. Aah, "Drafting" – the latest smoke screen to distract from potential doping discussions – it's not like camera bikes, team cars, race directors just started appearing in the last couple of years. Remember the controversy about the final TT at the 1984 Giro?

Leave A Reply