Dr Sebastian Eves-van den Akker is Head of the Plant-Parasite Interactions Group
The Crop Sciences Centre, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge

Plant-parasitic nematodes are a major, and In some cases a dominant, threat to food security around the world. A finely tuned molecular dialogue between the plant and animal kingdoms, in this case, gives rise to the pathology and ultimately the crop losses. The research group of Dr Sebastian Eves-van den Akker aims to understand the nature of this dialogue in sufficient detail to identify sustainable routes to control. The group tackles this question largely from a genetic and molecular perspective: defining the genes involved in the inter-kingdom communication between plants and their parasitic nematodes.

Discover more:
https://www.plantsci.cam.ac.uk/research/groups/plant-parasitepathogen-interactions
and https://www.sebastianevesvandenakker.com/

Filmed at the Gatsby Plant Science Summer School, 2023.
#plantscience #cropscience #nematodes

My name is Sebastian Eves-van den  Akker and I work at the University of   Cambridge on plant diseases and plant pathology. There’s many different ways you can categorise   the kind of research that we do. The one I’ve  kind of settled on over the years is genetics,  

So I work on genes. So I’m interested in what are  the genes that are required for the communication   between kingdoms of life. So between the plant  kingdom and for example, the animal kingdom that   are pathogens on the plants. So you know a lot  of the kind of research that we do is thinking  

About genes and genetics and that kind of thing. So I work on plant parasitic nematodes. These   are…we like to call them an orphan disease and  so an orphan disease means something that is   objectively important but often overlooked.  And one of the reasons why it’s an orphan  

Diseases because they’re parasite roots.  So they are literally overlooked because   they’re below ground and so therefore  they’re kind of figuratively overlooked.  The way these nematodes work, although there are  many different kinds of nematodes that infect many   different plants effectively they live in the  soil, they locate the roots of a plant growing  

Nearby. Once they find the root, they use this  needle like style it on their head end to pierce   a whole in the root, move inside the root tissue  and then move toward the centre of the root,   the vascular cylinder. Once they get to the  vascular cylinder here they display this  

Really amazing ability to manipulate plant  development immunity physiology and they   cause the plant to make a new pseudo-organ. This new pseudo-organ swells up inside the   plant. It drains the plant photosynthate  and that’s how it contributes to the crop  

Losses due to this disease and it feeds the  nematode. And so the nematode will slowly   withdraw nutrition from this pseudo-organ  sort of over the course of several weeks and   swelling up and then completes it life cycle. And so what we’re doing at what are the genes  

In the plant that control this formation of  this pseudo-organ and what are the genes in   the nematode that allow it to interact with  those developmental processes in the plant.   And the whole kind of idea behind the  work that we do is to try to understand  

Enough about the biology of the system such  that we could then block it in agriculture.  So the reason why they these plant parasite  nematodes are overlooked in research and   in agriculture is because they’re below ground  pathogens, and for that same reason they’re very  

Difficult to work with. So because they infect  the roots, roots are typically grown in soil,   and so you can imagine if there’s something  you want to observe, if you want to observe   this pathology, then it can be a challenge if  you’re trying to work with a soil substrate. 

And so one of the major bottlenecks in  our research in our lab, but also just   the field in general is basically observing  the pathology on roots. And so we’ve been   thinking about this for a long time, so  we decided to try and sort of address this  

Constraint and trying to accelerate our ability  to observe or phenotype the infection process.  And so what we did was firstly start with the  system where we had this transparent growing   medium so at least we can see the thing, this  is really important. And then based on this  

Transparent growing medium, we used 3D printers  and Raspberry Pi low-cost computers to build,   machines, although they’re quite basic machines,  but machines that will help us to image and to   manipulate these Petri dishes such that we can  do it at scale. So tens of thousands per day. 

And then we couple this new hardware  to new software. So trained an AI to   recognise nematodes from the images that come  out. The imaging machines such that we can then   phenotype or observe this infection on tens of  thousands of plants a day with relative ease. 

We had to do a lot of plants for this phenotyping  experiment, or we wanted the capability to be able   to phenotype a lot of plants in the lab for two  main reasons. The first one is replication, so as  

Is common in biological systems, there’s variation  and in order to account for the variation you do a   lot of biological replicates so that you can take  the average of those observations and that’s more   likely representative of the true phenotype.  And then you can compare the means, compare the  

Averages effectively between your conditions. And that’s true in biology in general,   but it’s very true in pathology and in plant  parasitic nematode biology because the system   is very variable. So there are lots of factors  that contribute and so we need lots of replicates  

To make sure we can account for some of this  variation. So we will typically do 20 biological   replicates per condition that we’re testing in  any given experiment. And so that’s one reason.   So anything we want to test, we multiply by 20. And then the other side of it is what we want to  

Test? And so we want to test panels of diversity  of plants to see whether they are susceptible   to nematodes or whether they’re resistant  to nematodes to identify those genes that   contribute to susceptibility or contribute  to resistance. And these panels are large. 

So the panel that we recently screened was 550  different varieties of the plant and so 550 times   20 replicates is 10,000. So the numbers get big  very quickly. And so you know if you have to do  

Anything 10,000 times, even if it’s quick, it’s  a lot of work. And so we really had to speed up   our ability to do the phenotyping so that we  could start to address these questions about   the natural variation in nematode resistance  and separability in different populations. 

So I’ve always been interested in plants from when  I was a child. So we had greenhouse and I used   to grow plants and I was always very interested  in that. And so I wanted to do…yes, when I knew  

I was going to go to university and I wanted  to study botany basically or plant sciences.  I came from a family of academics and so this idea  about being an academic wasn’t alien, and so I was   kind of, you know, thinking about that pretty  early on. And then when I got to university,  

I went to the University of Leeds and I studied  biology because there aren’t enough plant sciences   courses available and the closest thing I could  get was biology. So I chose a biology degree and   then I did as much plant stuff as I possibly could  and really enjoyed studying in the university. 

And so I kind of just put that together  and decided okay I’m going to go and do a   PhD. And it was during my final year undergraduate  project where you get to choose to do a reasonably  

Extended like research in a lab, in the university  where I first got exposed to actual research in a   university, but also the field that I currently  work in now. So my final year undergraduate   project was on plant parasitic nematodes and I  still work on plant parasitic nematodes today. 

And I’m the kind of person who is interested in  lots of things and so I get the impression to be   honest, that whatever I had done my final  year project in, I would probably just be   working on that because I find that the more  I look into something, the more interesting  

It becomes and so then it’s self-fulfilling. So I did my final year undergraduate project   in plant pathology and plant parasitic nematodes,  and thought I’ll do that for the PhD’s. I applied   for one PhD in that and I was very lucky to get  it. And this PhD was rather unusual in that it  

Was a joint appointment between two institutes.  So between the University of Leeds, in Leeds,   and the James Hunt Institute in Dundee. And it  was like a proper joint position. So I would   spend nine months in Leeds and then nine months  in Dundee and then alternate for the four years. 

So this is a lot of work and not very… you can  imagine how difficult that would be, right but   it was wonderful at the same time, because it  doubles the number of people can talk to and it  

Doubles the number of things you get exposed to  and stuff like that. So it was super valuable.  And I was working on frankly the same thing  I’m doing right now so what are the genes that   are important in this interaction between plant  parasitic nematodes and their host plants. And  

Yes, basically thoroughly enjoyed it and thought  I want to keep doing more of this. So after that   I applied to BBSRC the national funding for  biological research in the UK for a fellowship.   And at the time, these were called anniversary  future leader fellowships. So it was a three-year  

Position that allowed you to basically  pursue independent research, so typically   carry on the kind of thing that you were doing. So I was very fortunate to get that. And because   it was a project I had written, I designed it  the way that I wanted, not just for the science,  

But also for the kind of career development stuff.  So I actually at the time decided I like the joint   position and so I’ll do that again. So I then had  another joint position by my own design this time,   but this time between the John Innes Centre  in Norwich and the University of Dundee,  

Again in Dundee, and so I do the same thing  nine months, nine months for three years.  And then coming towards the coming  towards the end of that fellowship,   I decided I wanted to keep going in this. And  so I applied for another fellowship from BBSRC,  

This time the David Phillips Fellowship so much  larger and allows you to establish a group,   but at that point I decided I had  had enough of moving around and I   want to consolidate. And you know there’s  family considerations and things like that. 

So that one I decided to apply to and move it  to Cambridge and then started the group there   proper. And then that was in 2018, about 4-5  years ago and the group’s just been growing in   Cambridge ever since. And most recently, we just  moved to our brand-new flagship building called  

The Crop Science Centre, which is this initiative  between the University of Cambridge and the NIAB,   the National Institute of Agricultural Botany. And the idea of the alliance is to accelerate   the transition of fundamental plant sciences  into application. So this is like, you know,  

Vindicating the whole idea behind all the  research I’ve been doing at the time, which   is to try to understand enough about the problem  in order to prevent the problem in agriculture.  And so now we’re really set up to try to  push our fundamental science to impact. 

I think the best thing about my job is the  discovery aspect. So I’m most interested   when we’re finding something new and then once  we have found it, it’s almost less interesting   to me and then I’ll move on to the next finding  something new. So it’s definitely the process of  

The finding something new rather than what it is  that I have found that I find most interesting.

Leave A Reply