Watch this video ad-free on Nebula: https://nebula.tv/videos/not-just-bikes-the-dutch-solution-for-safer-sidewalks-continuous-sidewalks
Time to get excited about SIDEWALKS! The Netherlands does a lot to ensure a safe environment for pedestrians and cyclists, but the one that stands out the most for me is continuous sidewalks.
This video explores the basic concept of these safer sidewalks that are used everywhere in the Netherlands, but extremely rare (or poorly implemented) in other countries. This is an important part of the sustainable safety / vision zero efforts of the Netherlands to make streets safer for vulnerable road users.
Sign up to Nebula and watch ad-free and sponsor-free: https://go.nebula.tv/notjustbikes
Patreon: https://patreon.com/notjustbikes
Twitter: https://twitter.com/notjustbikes
Reddit: https://reddit.com/r/notjustbikes
One-time donations: https://notjustbikes.com/donate
NJB Live (my bicycle livestream channel):
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9v57F4xz46KaDsvWfCv8yw
當你看到這個影片結尾時 我希望能夠也激起你對人行道的熱情! 荷蘭的道路設計有很多可圈可點的地方 我正如火如荼地製作關於「交通寧靜化」的影片, 所以我不得不先提到 這個為保障行人安全所做的最大突破── 「無中斷人行道」 如果你把鏡頭帶到美、加的十字路口 看起來大約會像是這樣 人行道在路緣中斷 然後降到車道的高度 你會明顯感覺到自己穿過一段給車走的路 車上的駕駛經過 也會覺得看起來跟其他車道相差無幾 劃出行人穿越範圍的 只有跟慢車道一樣單薄的那條「神奇白線」 但它對減緩車速似乎沒有多大的效果 即使加掛一塊「停車再開」也差不多 嘿!老兄!這裡要「停車再開」!唉…… 再看看阿姆斯特丹的路口 行人經過路口時,人行道是沒有中斷的 高度也不會下降 這個設計的內在語言就是說「這裡是給人走的」 駕駛經過時 這裡的路面鋪設和坡度 都能清楚告訴駕駛該要減速 連續型人行道不是荷蘭的專利 但沒有哪個國家做得跟荷蘭一樣完善 這是英國倫敦的案例 如你所見,路口跟人行道一樣被抬高 但是有兩條黃色線 而且穿越道的顏色和其他車道一致 而不是和人行道一致 這表示它仍然屬於車道的一部份 雖然它還是有減速丘的功能 但從其他的設計上,它還是給車走的 接著來看看丹麥哥本哈根 這個方案肯定比較優越 它看起來更像是人行道而不是車道 當有自行車道時 車輛經過路口會有二階段的下降 但如果我是駕駛的話 還是很有可能會直接衝過路口 卻完全沒有注意到這個行人穿越道 而且還有更多路口根本沒有這種設計 回到荷蘭看看 穿越道的顏色與人行道一致 車輛駕駛可以很明確感受到 自己即將經過一段「給人走的路」 坡道的抬升也會從離路口遠一點的地方開始 車輛在經過時就可以更早知道要減速 車道的轉彎處有時候還是扇形的 但是曲率半徑會做得很小 路緣會截止得很急促,讓路口呈90度角 車輛必須幾乎停止才能轉得過去
減速一來可以讓駕駛比較不容易撞上別人 一來是即使撞上了也不會造成太嚴重的傷害 除此之外還有一個優點是 經過無中斷人行道進入巷子的車輛 會感覺跨過界線進入一個不同的區域 這個區域速限較低,也會有更多行人在活動 當然,這種方式只適用於支道和幹道交會的路口 幹道路口會使用不同的設計 也會有行人專用號誌 當街道與街道交會時 整個路口會像是一個巨大的減速丘 這我會在後續的影片中詳細介紹 如果有自行車專用道 它會跟人行道一樣抬高 它會與人行道高度相同自行車騎士就不需要先下坡再上坡 也不太需要減速 這也還蠻合理的,因為自行車騎士還是騎在主要道路上 不應該在行經巷口時還得減速 你很難用言語描述 在這種環境下步行有多舒適 就好像人才是城市的主角 而車輛只是過客 不會像以往那樣喧賓奪主 在荷蘭道路的許多優秀設計中 我認為這點是全世界的城市都該馬上執行 來改善道路環境的 這不只讓行人更安全 也讓步行這個選項更加的怡人 人們會因此更常選擇步行 如何?你也對人行道充滿熱情了嗎?
47 Comments
Thumbs up if you're excited about sidewalks!! 👍🏻
These continuous sidewalk keep popping up everywhere in Switzerland, but as always in this country local authorities couldn't bother to follow the same guidelines so we ended up with a different design for each and every city and village in the country. Some cities nailed it while others completely missed it, with steep inclines that make it pretty difficult for bikes to climb over. Of course the worst of these popped up in the least bike-friendly cities like my hometown, because city officials there probably never rode a bike in their adult life
already excited about sidewalks, if only they would do it in my country
I much prefer the London design. I don't like the idea of cars driving on pavement. It's not utilised often enough though.
That would really help reduce the number of pedestrian v motor vehicle accident patients I see in my skilled nursing facility. I work in an area with high population of unhoused individuals and many if them have mobility limitations requiring use if wheelchairs, walkers or scooters. We get a new patient several times a week who was hit by a motor vehicle. It’s really sad how the streets are designed to say “motor vehicle transportation is superior to any other form of transportation so all you bikers, skaters, pedestrians better be aware!!”
It looks all very confusing if you don't know what's going on. If I ever go to the Netherlands, now I know never to rent a car.
So, if the ground looks like a path, it is a path – seems fair and clear.
But, if the ground looks like a road, is the situation reversed. Do people recognise it is a road and know to wait and take care crossing because they don't have priority?
Another small benefit of the raised sidewalk: no (or much fewer) HUGE puddles waiting for you when you step onto the street
Interestingly a junction near me in London has just been converted to the fully continuous Dutch style, maybe it's catching on over here too
Simple solution to multiple problems. Brilliant. Unfortunately, this is an idea from Europe, so it's automatically a communist plot to deprive Americans of their religious liberty.
It's called a wombat crossing in Australia.
I think my only concern with this (entirely from the visuals in the video and never actually having encountered a continuous sidewalk IRL) is if i was approaching the sidewalk in my car from the same direction as the car at 1:09, the way the sidewalk continues visually would make it a little difficult to tell where the area of the sidewalk I am allowed to drive over ends and the rest of the sidewalk begins, if that makes sense. The yellow lines at 1:37 are excessive and I agree with you about how it signals to the driver the purpose of the space, but they do also clearly delineate the border of the space. If there was a line of a different shade of brick in the 1:09 example that delineated how far left or right I can go into the sidewalk I would be more comfortable with it.
I could also just be way overthinking it and it's fine in practice. Sorry if this doesn't make sense, it's difficult to describe with text.
Here in Chile we have..absolutely nothing near what you are describing. One more thing to be disappointed about
here in Canada walking is so dangerous since car is legal to turn even traffic light in RED! in Hong Kong people walk so quick and safe, no cars can go in Red light!! impossible to change in Toronto??? any idea?
I can't even get trailway designers in the USA to do this at intersections.
I got excited when i saw one of these for the first time in a failed first attempt at mixed use zoning in my county.
I wanna live in amsterdam
Either Europe is in future or USA is living hell.
for me a "big" thing for the raised sidewalk is it also makes using the crossing easier for pushing and trucks / wagons ETC not to mention people with handicaps or are in wheelchairs / mobility aids as the kirb down to the road becomes a "choke point" and often a steep elevation change and in 2022 ignoring "active transport" / "being ECO" being more accessible should be a reason alone to push for such crossings
I use a motorised wheelchair and Continuous Sidewalks would certainly improve things. Bike lanes would also. Gatineau, Québec is not that great for both accessibility and safe and wide sidewalks to accomodate two motorised wheelchairs passing each other. I use this example because sidewalks should be wide to accommodate "trafic" in both directions. The width and hight of sidewalks is also dangerous to falls (tip overs) of wheelchairs.
Hate Everything you say because it is so true 🤣🤣🤣
@Not Just Bikes: Could you do a video about the numbers of car-bike and car-pedestrian related accidents?
I think that will be an eye opener for the USA if this data is available.
remake of this vid when?? i wanna become excited for sidewalks all over again!
I like this concept. Looking forward to more vids and visiting the Netherlands to experience it first hand
I will say that I'm not a fan of the brick roads. There should be another way to texture the path and junction if cars are going to be allowed on it at all even if it is just to cross it.
Just a durability concern. Of cars weren't allowed then brick is fine.
My Alma Mater (MTSU) put these in several years ago. They really work well and are very helpful for disabled students on mobility scooters
i'm a recent subscriber and i just want to say i love this channel already. the visuals are well-presented, the style is engaging, and the ideas clearly explained. keep up the good work!
0:11 Finley a view of the narator.
Some of these are popping up in my third world country shithole of a city and I'm glad they're finally doing something right.
Absolutely agree! Even on the rare occasion when there are continuous pavements in the UK, having them road-coloured is most definitely a stupid idea. It simply reinforces the culture that cars are more important than people, and is an opportunity missed. UK cycle and footpath crossings are generally not fit for purpose, often intimidating and downright dangerous. When will the UK get its act together and so encourage active transport? My fear is that it will simply continue to talk the talk but take little if any action. Motorists dominate and therefore they generally get what they want, and they certainly aren't keen about ceding any road space to pedestrians or cyclists. Absolutely pathetic ☹️
Well you certainly opened my eyes! I never thought about this and can see how it's very effective.
In Turin, Italy (a really car friendly city), there’s literally one continuous sidewalk that separates the road from the main station parking and you can really see that is incredibly safer than normal crossings, both as a pedestrian/cyclist and as a driver.
Ya, America sucks.
I want to marry a sidewalk now.
Would like to have this is in Germany.
More like I'm jealous of your sidewalks.
Yeah but that goes back to fundamentals. Does US wants its people to be smart and fit ? No. Of course not. They like them fat and stupid.
Yeah it's quite interesting. you can really feel when infrastructure is built for the walker or for the car. the dipping down of the sidewalk onto the road means that cars get annoyed at people, when it should be people walking who have the right of way. That being said, living in a car dependent place, only city centers would have a chance to implement this sort of sidewalk. New developments too. It would be nice to see some mixed use development around the major transport hubs. You have me convinced on all these points and I will endeavour to visit amsterdam.
One of the advantages I see with continuous sidewalks is that it's a lot easier to cross with a wheelchair (or baby stroller) or with reduced sight. No need to turn around to get down to street level with the back wheels first (because otherwise you throw the person out of the chair due to the drop). Especially for people in a wheelchair on their own it's a lot safer and easier to use.
Crosswalks (the two white lines) are raw where I live. Very rare. And generally, drivers just ignore them & pull up to the front most white line or even further. But yeah I really like this idea: have the car be the one intruding on the walking space instead of the person intruding on the driving space. Instead of putting the car first so drivers feel like they own the space & scream at people to "get out of the road!" make it clear that people walking belong there.
I’m excited.
It's also frustrating that even if people acknowledge the stop sign, they mostly end up stopping in the middle of the pedestrian crossing
Typed in "Netherlands pedestrians" in search menu just to ask question. I found that Netherlands don't have such thing as Jaywalking and we can cross the road wherever we want but if it is on zebra then pedestrian has priority. However there is a question emerges that isn't explained anywhere (i don't know Dutch so can't read rules). If there is no such things as Jaywalking, then what about red light (for pedestrian)? Can i get a fine for walking on red light? Not that i want to (i actually prefer use zebra and wait for right light) but question is still valid. Because if i can get fine for that then technically i could just cross few meters away from zebra where there is no traffic light (potentially creating dangerous situation).
So is traffic light (for pedestrians) is only for convenience?
Fisrt time ever hearing about sidewalk safety. For a good reason. Thats not a thing. In every place I've been to.
1:48 yellow tiles are for Blind disibility persons.
I think it's worth pointing out how at 1:53 the people crossing the road waited, although the car yielded in the end. The lad sends his thanks and this is all nice, but I much prefer how you can just saunter onto the road in most European city. When this was filmed the car had right of way but now in the UK the pedestrian does, but people haven't adapted fully yet
With how wide those sidewalks are with no barriers. I'm sure someone in my city would be driving down them daily. There's often someone getting stuck in a bus trap for bus only roads