Will the German government come to the rescue of Siemens Energy? Negotiations for a €16 billion loan guarantee are underway after the company posted massive losses in its wind turbine unit. The company – a spin-off of former parent Siemens – has faced significant repair bills due to flaws discovered in its turbines. High borrowing rates – increasing the cost of construction – have added to its woes. Potentially at stake: Germany’s energy security and climate goals. We speak to Clemens Fuest at the Ifo Research Institute.
Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/user/deutschewelleenglish?sub_confirmation=1
For more news go to: http://www.dw.com/en/
Follow DW on social media:
►Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deutschewellenews/
►Twitter: https://twitter.com/dwnews
►Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dwnews
►Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/dwnews_hangout
Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: https://www.youtube.com/dwdeutsch
#business #SiemensEnergy
The German government is considering plans to extend a massive Lifeline to alien power company Zan’s energy a potential 16 billion EUR in loan guarantees is on the table aimed at enabling the company to meet a massive backlog in deliveries at its Gesa wind turbine division the company a spin-off
Of former parent zans has faced significant repair bills due to flaws discovered in its turbines High borrow rates increasing the cost of construction have added to its Wes let’s bring in Clemens fuss president of the eepo research institute and a Critic of plans for the German government to rescue Seaman’s energy Mr
F why do you think this is such a bad idea well it’s a very bad idea because it is primarily the responsibility of zman’s energy uh its banks maybe also its parent zens uh to to finance these guarantees uh and certainly not of the government the trouble is when companies
Have issues have difficulties they turn to the government and when they make profits they privatize those profits uh that is unfair and it also sets the wrong incentives for management inviting them to uh act in a very risky way so there’s no reason why the taxpayer uh should help
Zman’s energy in this situation the banks can do that the parent company can and should do it what about the idea of a Level Playing Field though seans is facing competitions from China which provides massive subsidies to its Renewables companies surely letting the company languish is in nobody’s interest
Including that of the German people well there are ways to deal with foreign subsidies if they are unfair the WTO allows countries to Levy import tariffs so if the EU thinks uh when turbines from China are subsidized in an unfair manner uh it can raise tariffs uh here um this is not so
Much about uh competition being too tough this is about a big order lock in fact the company has uh where it needs financing to process that order log and U it seems that Banks and the parent company don’t want to finance this because they are concerned about mismanagement uh in the subsidiary Gesa
The zens energy subsidiary Gesa and it is not the taxpayer’s job to pay for management errors so this is not so much about Chinese competition it’s about management errors at zens energy uh and they should fix these things on their own I want to talk about those management errors though because Gesa
Has a huge backlog of orders what has gone wrong here yes with with with a large backlog of orders uh it is important to have enough financing to get those orders going to process those orders and it’s standard to deal with this it’s a management question to make sure how do
You make sure if you take on orders how do you make sure you have the financing to actually carry out and and process these orders and for that you need to talk to your clients you need to talk to your Banks it’s a standard management job that went wrong and now um zens
Energy returns to the government um that’s really uh unfair they should fix it on their own but there are external factors when it comes to financing High borrowing rates have made construction much more expensive absolutely and uh it is the job of management to adjust to those
High interest rates maybe take on fewer orders maybe focus on the most profitable orders something like that um but uh it’s certainly not I mean the respon resp to high interest rates is not to get the money uh from the government the high interest rates set
By the central banks are a signal maybe not to carry out all investment projects but to put to the side some the less profitable ones and that’s exactly what the management should do I think it’s fair to say though that Seaman energy is not alone here though Swedish company vattenfall has halted
Work on an offshore Wind Farm off the norfol coast this Danish Wind Farm giant orad it’s also run into problems in the US doesn’t this point to a wider problem in the renewable sector it certainly poses to the fact that we do have Rising interest rates at
The moment and we have them because we have inflation and the natural reaction to inflation is to Halt some projects it may very well be that the Renewables sector has particular issues but it’s not the task of of the German government to fix those issues by giving guarantees
To zens energy if there are issues like slow planning procedures those should be fixed uh but the answer to those problems is not giving money to zens energy to correct or to fix management problems If zens energy were to write off its Gesa unit though what would that
Mean for Germany’s energy security as well as its ability to meet its clean energy targets uh the clean energy targets can also be met by buying wind turbines from other suppliers there are many as you said there are many suppliers in the world we can very well import wind
Turbines we don’t depend on zman’s energy and if zman’s energy gets into difficulties has to shrink a little bit this doesn’t mean its production stops uh maybe someone else will take over some of that production there is large demand for wind turbines in the world as
A whole and on top of that wind turbines are not like uh key drugs uh that very important drugs you need in an emergency if for two or three months you are cut off from win turbine Imports that’s not a big problem so the security issues are
Not as large as with critical drugs or with let’s say gas so uh security arguments are are not applicable easily to the wind turbine business if we look at the bigger picture then the German economy as a whole is not doing very well the latest data is far from saying GDP shrunk in
The last quarter how worried are you about the health of Europe’s largest economy uh Germany faces short-term issues like uh High interest rates High Energy prices and so on uh but on top of that Germany faces some structural questions what is the future of its energy intensive industry what is the
Future of its car industry these structural issues uh weigh on the German economy and explain why it is perform performing worse than other comparable economy and what the government needs to do in this situation is push for reforms that improve energy Supply that reduce a bureaucratic and tax burdens reform um
That allow for uh for more infrastructure investment so we need a growth agenda in Germany a broad growth agenda uh to address these issues kman F president of the eepa research institute thank you very much thank you
43 Comments
Nuclear > wind / solar. Wind and solar are important and have clear use cases but not at the scale of entire national grids. That’s where safe and reliable power sources like nuclear step in. France pays, on average, half the cost per kWh than Germans due. Germany produces 50% less electricity than it did 30 years ago and consumes the same amount of electricity it did 30 years ago, down 12% over the last 10 years. Signs of an ailing economy when energy consumption stagnates, let alone drops. Frances production had increased by 25% since 1990 but has recently nose dived in the last 5 or so years, dropping 16%. That being said, their overall consumption has grown over the last thirty years by 30%, down from a 50% high in 2010. For reference, US production is up 40% over the last 30 years and consumption is up 40%
“Clean” energy.
Yes, this is another try at neo-liberal socialism, which socializes losses and pockets profits.
I fully agree with your correspondent.
He resumed it perfectly: profits are privatized, problems are nationalized.
Too big to fail !
Green transition scam going on 😁
He's right in the wrong way. The government should back the industry with investment, but the profits must be socialised not privatised. Siemens should become an efficient State Corporation. Privately run, but state owned, with the profits returning to the government or re-invested in new technology and job creation.
Germany is desperate, the end of their industrial might is very near, and they are seeking a solution. The writing is already on the wall though, and the economy will need to adjust accordingly. Bailing out companies and taking on their risk is not the solution they need.
The fossil fuel industry is given massive subsidizes that dwaft anything in the green sector, which is just free money to keep burns stuff producing more CO2.
In this story it is not free money and the person being interview was being misleading when he said Siemens would be given money by the German government. This story is about Gernany giving a loan guarentee, so that Siemens can borrow money.
You need to address the fact the fossil fuel industries are given so much free money by the German government and other governments first before worrying about this.
Erm… So if the Chinese government manufacturers provides massive subsidies to the renewable energy sector, which is supposed to be one of the solutions to climate change, then shouldn't the German government respond by giving massive subsidies to it's own renewable energy sector?
I mean we ARE trying to resolve the climate crisis aren't we?
Won't adding tariff just extract the values injected by the Chinese government to line its own pocket?
What a bundle of joy that guy is.
What they didn't tackle is WHY the gov IS doing it.
Which is far more interesting and useful than just saying what the gov is doing 'wrong'.
America did r same, but folks can sue d company for more benefits.
He is right about good/bad times differences regarding private companies!
However this is how China became dominant in solar panels & electric cars!
Sounds like unfair competition. So Enercon or Vestas don't get this subsidy cause their products actually work? If they cannot fullfill their backlog these orders can be canceled and taken care of by Enercon.
As long as we have billions to support the local car industry and for subsidies for foreign chip manufacturers…IFO really does not like renewable energies.
Im German and totally agree to him.
If it was so important the parent company siemens would finance it….
Don't worry – the management is and will be paid fully including a 38% raise as soon as the signature is on the paper – and any bonus you can think of, which add up to around 250% their annual salary. Sadly, they will have to let go 10% of the workforce because there just isn't enough money.
So Siemens Energy has an undisclosed quality issue in it's wind turbine division and has accepted orders on terms that are not financially viable – and now they want the taxpayer to bail them out! That's a giant con. As the interviewee points out this is a business issue to be solved by Siemens, it's banks and its backers. It is most definitely NOT a taxpayer issue. And I just love it when the DW host tries to pin it on China and is very politely told it's a Siemens business issue – nothing to do with China. The host looks so disappointed that the old "blame China" game didn't work.
So how was that one company once again called?
I wonder if this pol is sponsored by big oil?
He nailed it! 🔨 Privatise the profits and socialize losses🤔
Without cheap pipe gas, Germany's engineering industry is falling into the abyss. That's why the US blew up the gas pipeline. Eliminated a competitor.
No need to save. Just send money to Ukraine.
I agree with the general problem of sozializing risks but I think this case is an exception. Germany is performing a transformation of it's economy. I think it's quite possible that the driver of future GDP will be renewable technology. But the transition should be accelerated as much as possible because it's a unpleasant time and because speed will decide about key players and the dominant design of future technologies. Besides, the hole sector of wind turbine production has capacity problems and can not meet the demand. Therefore, I think the German government is doing the right thing.
I like the reason. Thats unfair!
German government and all businesses are partners on any industry, including Siemens Energy. The heavy investment on wind and solar energy have performed not as expected from businesses and government and the energy challenges Germany and all the world has today will not be solved using expensive intermittent wind and solar energy which normally need even more investment on energy storing and energy distribution. All these investment will be e big burden for German Peoples on the present and will acerbate even more on near future. Increasing the power using longer turbine wings will make the investment even worse. The solution are simple and German government and Siemens Energy together with other industries have a great opportunity to advance wind power generation without longer wings, or even without wings. This will keep industry competitive if will be used, because investment will produce more and will work longer. Levitation and gravity power can easy combined and generate continuously electricity. Then if country need Hydrogen with continuous electricity from levitation-gravity power, the H2 can produced everywhere like the electricity can be produced everywhere, decreasing the investment and other expenses for distribution.
DW News reporters can inform the Siemens Energy company and German government for this opportunity and they can contact for more information.
not sure what i am missing here. he said loan so siemens energy will have to pay interest to the government which is fine right. i mean government is getting the profit even if the management fails again. why people are thinking that their profits will be privatised where even the profits is taxed by the government. including the pay raise that the management will get.
Contradictory, focus on energy for growth agenda but not finance growth agenda. This guy does not makes sense.
They are in trouble because of a design flaw? So they had no insurance, overpaid bad engineers and overpaid bad management and now are asking the gouvernement for help? How is that fair? When my house burns down because I did a mistake and don't have insurance, no one is paying me back or giving me a loan. This should not happen.
So nice, all common sense from this guy. I hope people are not mislead but understand what he says is what is right.
🎉🎉🎉
Need more old-school Germans like this guy! What a savage. Precise, rational, hard cold facts 👏🧊
Forget about Siemens energy, „WTO can handle China‘s unfair subsidies“? That is a laughable concept.
Ultimately, taxpayers are the final arbiters and if they don't like their government, they will change it. The 'funny money' days are nearing an end.
the hurried clean energy targets are the cause of higher inflation in the first place, now rising interest rates are biting these illusionary Green dreams. Besides that, the durability of glass fiber blades is wanting, carbon fiber would be stiffer, better but they are more expensive (used in airplane wings ). CFC at the end of lifespan is better recyclable, too!
The side effects of widespread wind energy use on the atmospheric circulation and on the Northern Jet Stream are not well researched and can no longer be blatantly ignored! it is not just a banking problem.
Good. Don't screw the tax payers.
Prof Clemens Fuest is god damned right.
Bundesbank was a bitter critique of zero interest rate policy of EZB! Little did they know that Germans and German businesses were addicted to it.
Fuest's apodoktische Aussage Windturbinen seien keine kritische Infrastruktur ist nicht haltbar. Mit dem Verkauf von Turbinen werden laufuözeitlange Wartungsverträge geschlossen, die dann einer erneute Diktaturabhängikeit den Weg ebneten.
Es sind hier auch nur Garantien, keine direkte Zahlungen. Denn och stimme ich in vielen anderen Punkten zu ..
Und die Regierung hat wieder mal schwach verhandelt – Siemens als Mutter müsste mehr leisten ..
The true price Germans pay for partnering with China.
The argument against government subsidies made here is very persuasive.
Corruption made in Europe.
They did take responsibility when they bought out ownership of Gamesa. They showed that they were willing to take back control of their own company. People like to blame companies, but problems happen, and most energy companies are reliant on the government anyway. Energy is important to all.